News

 Statistics

Number of Journals34
Number of Issues1,306
Number of Articles9,427
Article View9,188,645
PDF Download5,620,932
Keshavarzi, A., Radseresht, M. (2024). An appraisal of the knowledge management maturity level, and providing improvement plans (case study: havanaja). Electronic and Cyber Defense, 1(1), 11-47. doi: 10.47176/smok.2018.1147
Ali Hussein Keshavarzi; Mojtaba Radseresht. "An appraisal of the knowledge management maturity level, and providing improvement plans (case study: havanaja)". Electronic and Cyber Defense, 1, 1, 2024, 11-47. doi: 10.47176/smok.2018.1147
Keshavarzi, A., Radseresht, M. (2024). 'An appraisal of the knowledge management maturity level, and providing improvement plans (case study: havanaja)', Electronic and Cyber Defense, 1(1), pp. 11-47. doi: 10.47176/smok.2018.1147
Keshavarzi, A., Radseresht, M. An appraisal of the knowledge management maturity level, and providing improvement plans (case study: havanaja). Electronic and Cyber Defense, 2024; 1(1): 11-47. doi: 10.47176/smok.2018.1147

An appraisal of the knowledge management maturity level, and providing improvement plans (case study: havanaja)

مدیریت راهبردی دانش سازمانی
Article 1, Volume 1, Issue 1, June 2018, Pages 11-47    PDF (1.08 M)
Document Type: Original Research Paper
DOI: 10.47176/smok.2018.1147
Authors
Ali Hussein Keshavarzi* 1; Mojtaba Radseresht2
1assistant professor at industrial management, Shahed University
2Researcher at Havanaja research center
Abstract
This research aimed at evaluating knowledge management maturity level, and providing improvement plans for Havanaja. Research population included all 400 employees in Havanaja. Data collection was conducted in two phases, employing questionnaires and interviews. In the first phase, quantitative data were collected through standard questionnaire of Asian Productivity Organization having 42 items. Using Cochran formula, a number of 196 people was selected as the sample group. Using stratified random sampling, 280 questionnaires were distributed in all departments, and 249 employees filled in the questionnaires. In the second phase of data collection, six individuals were interviewed. The results of data analysis indicated that Havanaja is at the second step of five steps of knowledge management maturity level, getting 123.82 out of 210 highest score. In terms of the seven knowledge management criteria, the criterion of process was identified as the first, receiving 18.74 out of 30 highest score. The lowest rank was given to individuals’ criteria, receiving 16.51 out of 30 highest score. The rest five criteria were ranked at second to sixth respectively: technology, knowledge management results, leadership, learning and innovation, and knowledge processes. Based on qualitative data, the most important improvement opportunities in terms of knowledge management in Havanaja included: lack of a formal and systematic process for identification, creation, storage, sharing, and application of knowledge in the organization; poor knowledge sharing culture due to saving personal benefits, high formality and low meritocracy as a barrier to knowledge sharing; lack of a formal system responsible for documentation of knowledge and experience in the organization; and fear from disciplinary actions as a barrier to experience documentation by individuals.
Keywords
knowledge management; knowledge management maturity; Iran; Havanaja; police
References
  1. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E. (2001), "Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues", MS Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 107-32.
  2. Birasnav, M. (2014). Knowledge management and organizational performance in the service industry: The role of transformational leadership beyond the effects of transactional leadership. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1622-1629.
  3. Broström, A., & Karlsson, S. (2016). Mapping research on R&D, innovation and productivity: a study of an academic endeavour. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1-15.
  4. Cetin, G., Demirciftci, T., & Bilgihan, A. (2016). Meeting revenue management challenges: Knowledge, skills and abilities. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 57, 132-142.
  5. Chan, E. S., Gawlick, D., Ghoneimy, A., & Liu, Z. H. (2016). U.S. Patent No. 9,330,119. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  6. Chowdhury, S. 2000. "Management 21st Century",  London: Pearson, Education Limited.
  7. Davenport, TH. (1997), Ten principles of knowledge management and four case studies, Knowledge and Process Management, 4(3), 187-208.
  8. Davenport, T. and Prusak, L. (1998), “Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know”, Harvard Business School Press.
  9. Davenport, T. H., Harris, J. G., & Kohli, A. K. (2001). How do they know their customers so well?. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(2), 63-74.
  10. Davenport, T.H. (2005), Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performance and Results from Knowledge Workers, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  11. Davenport, T.H., DeLong, D.W., & Beers, M.C. (1998). Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 43-57.
  12. Drucker, Peter. The new realities. Routledge, 2012.
  13. Dumay, J., & Cai, L. (2015). Using content analysis as a research methodology for investigating intellectual capital disclosure: a critique. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(1), 121-155.
  14. Ford, D. (2001), "Trust and knowledge management: The seeds of success". Working paper WP 01-08. Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Queen''s KBE Center for knowledge-Based Enterprises, Queen''s School of business. Retrieved from http://business.queensu.ca/knowledge/working papers/working/working_01-08.pdf
  15. Liebowitz, J., & Frank, M. (Eds.). (2016). Knowledge management and e-learning. CRC press.
  16. Lipparini, A., Lorenzoni, G., & Ferriani, S. (2014). From core to periphery and back: A study on the deliberate shaping of knowledge flows in interfirm dyads and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 578-595.
  17. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge–Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation?, New York, Oxford University press.
  18. O''Dell, C. & Grayson, C.J. (1998), If only we knew what we know: identification and transfer of internal best practices, California Management Review, 40(3), pp. 154-74.
  19. Peel, L. G. Teah, H. Y. and Kankanhalli, A. (2002), “Development of a General Knowledge Management Maturity Model”, School of Computing, National University of Singapore. 
  20. Peppard, Joe. and Ward, John. (2016), The Strategic Management Information System: Building A Digital Strategy. 4th Edition, London, Wiley.
  21. Polanyi, M.(1965) "The Tacit Dimension", London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  22. Polani M (1969), "The logic of tacit inference", in Grene, M. (Ed.) Knowing and Being, Routledge& Keagan Paul, London.
  23. Rao, M. (2005), "The Social Life of KM Tools" Edited by Rao " Knowledge Management Tools and Techniques", Elesvier, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
  24. Ruggles & Little (1997), "Knowledge management and innovation: An initial exploration". Working paper, Ernst & Young LLP Center for Bussiness Innovations. Retrieved from http://www.providersedge.com/docs/km_articles/KM_and_Innovation.pdf
  25. Skyrme, D. J. (2002). The 3Cs of knowledge sharing: Culture, co-opetition and commitment [online on www.skyrme.com] review, 20 September 2014.
  26. Solow, R.M. (1957), "Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function" The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.39 no3
  27. Marfo, K. (2016). Context and the Advancement of a global Science of Human Development: A Commenbtary. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 81(1), 172-182.
  28. Nonaka, I. & H. Takeuchi (1995), the knowledge – creating company, Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  29. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York.
  30. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford university press.
  31. Nonaka, I., Reinmoeller, P. and Senoo, D. (1998). The Art of Knowledge: Systems to Capitalize on Market Knowledge. European Management Journal. 16 (6): 673-684.
  32. Nonaka, Ikujiro, and Noboru Konno. 1998. “The Concept of ‘Ba’: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation.” California Management Review 40 (3): 40–54. bth. http://search.proquest.com/docview/216149525?accountid=4840.
  33. Nonaka, I. (1991),"The Knowledge – Creating Company", Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: http://hbr.org/2007/07/The-knowlege -creating-company/ar/1
  34. Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2004), "The 7 C model for organizational knowledge creation and management". Retrieved from http://www.oasis.oulu.fi/publications/OKLC-04-hok.pdf
  35. Ogiela, L. (2015). Advanced techniques for knowledge management and access to strategic information. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 154-159.
  36. Spelke, E. S. (2016). Core Knowledge and Conceptual Change. Core Knowledge and Conceptual Change, 279.
  37. Staehle, W. H. (1999). Management. München, Vahlen.
  38. Wiig, K. M. (1997), Knowledge Management: where did it come from and where will it go?, Journal of Expert Systems with Application;13(1).
  39. Wiig, K.M. (1997), Integrating intellectual capital and knowledge management, Long range planning, 30 (3), 399-405
  40. Wilensky, H. L. (2015). Organizational intelligence: Knowledge and policy in government and industry (Vol. 19). Quid Pro Books.
  41. Wiig, Karl M. (2002), "Knowledge management in public administration", Journal of knowledge management, volume 6 issue 3 pp224-239
  42. www.apqc.org, Date visited, 25 September 2014.
  43. Zhang, X., & Jiang, J. Y. (2015). With whom shall I share my knowledge? A recipient perspective of knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2), 277-295.
Statistics
Article View: 3,044
PDF Download: 2,336