News

 Statistics

Number of Journals34
Number of Issues1,306
Number of Articles9,428
Article View9,191,889
PDF Download5,622,558
roozbeh, H., goodarzi, M. (2018). US soft strategies to infiltrate Iraq. Electronic and Cyber Defense, 10(35), 221-243.
hossein roozbeh; mahnaz goodarzi. "US soft strategies to infiltrate Iraq". Electronic and Cyber Defense, 10, 35, 2018, 221-243.
roozbeh, H., goodarzi, M. (2018). 'US soft strategies to infiltrate Iraq', Electronic and Cyber Defense, 10(35), pp. 221-243.
roozbeh, H., goodarzi, M. US soft strategies to infiltrate Iraq. Electronic and Cyber Defense, 2018; 10(35): 221-243.

US soft strategies to infiltrate Iraq

فصلنامه آفاق امنیت
Article 8, Volume 10, Issue 35, May 2017, Pages 221-243    PDF (94.04 K)
Authors
hossein roozbeh* 1; mahnaz goodarzi2
1Candidate for Doctorate in International Relations, Islamic Azad University
2Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan) (Corresponding Author)
Receive Date: 09 May 2018,  Revise Date: 13 January 2019,  Accept Date: 19 September 2018 
Abstract
The culmination of a post-occupation military strategy in Iraq prompted the United States and its strategic allies to pursue a strategy of expanding their influence in the direction of securing the interests and strengthening of American values ​​and identities, as well as recovering their damaged face from the Iraq war with the nations of the region and the world. Rely on soft power to put it on the agenda. Applying a soft strategy to expand influence, in both the stages of "state-building" (2008-2008) and "nation-building" (after 2008), is America's primary strategy for securing national security and its interests in Iraq. This article is about researching how to implement soft strategies for US influence in the post-Saddam Iraq and at the stage of state-building and after. As we seek to discover and unravel America's soft strategies in Iraq, we outline the implementing structures of soft US strategies that expand US influence in various parts of Iraqi government and society. The methodology of this research is based on the analysis of online documents and textual data, existing documents and research.
Keywords
Foreign Policy; Soft Power; Influence; America; Iraq; International Institutions
References
ADM Michael G. Mullen (2012) Strategic Communication: Getting Back to Basics, Washington, Joint Force Quarterly.
Antonio Chavarria (2008) Wars of Ideas and the War of Ideas, Washington, Strategic Studies Institute.
Boone Bartholomees (2012) National Security Policy and Strategy, 5th College Guide to National Security Issues. Washington, Strategic Studies Institute.
Hassan Mneimneh(2009) Wars of Ideas and the War of Ideas, Washington, Hudson Institute.
Heller C. Dale (2012) Fill the Public Diplomacy Leadership Vacuum, Washington, Heritage Foundation.
Herbert London (2010) a Strategy for Winning the War of Ideas, Washington, Hudson Institute
Katrina Trots and Matthew Wallin (2015).academic Exchange: A Pillar of American Public Diplomacy: Washington, American Security Project.
Mari K. Eder. (2008) Toward Strategic Communication, Washington, DoD, Military Review.
Matthew Wallin (2015) Military Public Diplomacy: How the Military Influences Foreign Audiences, Washington. American Security Project.
Michael Waller.(2009) Getting Serious About Strategic Influence, Journal of International Security Affairs, Washington,csis.
Lee H. Hamilton and James Baker (2006) The Iraq Study Group Report: The Way Forward - A New Approach, Washington, Usip Press. available from https : // www .usip.org /regions/ middle -east / Iraq.
Peter Krause and Stephen Van Evera,(2012) Ideas for the War of Ideas, Washington, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
Richard Lee Armitage (2007) CSIS Commission on Smart Power: a smarter, more secure America, Washington, CSIS Press. available from https://www.csis.org/analysis/smarter-more-secure-america.
Report of the Leadership Group on U.S.-Muslim Engagement(2008) Changing Course: A New Direction for U.S. Relations with the Muslim World, the Consensus Building Institute.
Robert Satloff. (2008) How to Win the War of Ideas, Washington, Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
US DOS advisory group (2003) changing minds winning peace, Washington, Department of state. Available from www.state.gov/documents/organization/149966.pdf.
US DOS advisory group (2010) Assessing US Public Diplomacy: A Notional Model, Washington Department of state. available from https://www.state.gov/pdcommission/reports /172075.
Usip (2015).2015 annual report of usip. Washington. Available from : https:// www.usip.org /about.
Usip (2016).2016 annual report of usip. Washington. Available from : https:// www.usip.org /about.
Ned. (2015). annual report of ned. Washington http://www.ned.org/aboutus.
Ned. (2016).2016 annual report of ned. Washington http://www.ned.org/about us.
http://tarabot-iraq.org/initiatives/49-administrative decentralization.
http://iraqgsp.org/provincial-planning-and-developmental-council-ppdc/.
Usaid. (2010). 2010annual report of usaid. Washington. available from https: //www.usaid. gov/about us.
Usaid. (2011). 2011annual report of usaid.Washington.availablefromttps://www.usaid.gov/about us.
Usaid. (2012). 2012annual report of usaid. Washington. available from https://www.usaid.gov/about us.
Usaid. (2013). 2013annual report of usaid. Washington. available from https://www.usaid.gov/about us.
Usaid. (2014). 2014annual report of usaid. Washington. available from https://www.usaid.gov/about us.
Usaid. (2015). 2015 annual report of usaid. Washington. available from https://www.usaid.gov/about us.
Usaid. (2016). 2016annual report of usaid. Washington. available from https://www.usaid.gov/about us.
Iie.(2013).2013 annual report of iie.Washington. available from.https://www.iie.org/Programs/ISLP.

Statistics
Article View: 670
PDF Download: 783