News

 Statistics

Number of Journals34
Number of Issues1,306
Number of Articles9,428
Article View9,191,885
PDF Download5,622,552
Asakereh, A., Hassanpour, M. (2019). Numerical Studying of Explosion Effect on Buried Pipelines in Geosynthetics Reinforced Soil. Electronic and Cyber Defense, 10(3), 221-232.
Adel Asakereh; Mohammad reza Hassanpour. "Numerical Studying of Explosion Effect on Buried Pipelines in Geosynthetics Reinforced Soil". Electronic and Cyber Defense, 10, 3, 2019, 221-232.
Asakereh, A., Hassanpour, M. (2019). 'Numerical Studying of Explosion Effect on Buried Pipelines in Geosynthetics Reinforced Soil', Electronic and Cyber Defense, 10(3), pp. 221-232.
Asakereh, A., Hassanpour, M. Numerical Studying of Explosion Effect on Buried Pipelines in Geosynthetics Reinforced Soil. Electronic and Cyber Defense, 2019; 10(3): 221-232.

Numerical Studying of Explosion Effect on Buried Pipelines in Geosynthetics Reinforced Soil

علوم و فناوریهای پدافند نوین
Article 2, Volume 10, Issue 3 - Serial Number 37, July 2019, Pages 221-232    PDF (1.27 M)
Document Type: -
Authors
Adel Asakereh* ; Mohammad reza Hassanpour
University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas
Receive Date: 03 August 2018,  Revise Date: 21 November 2018,  Accept Date: 08 January 2019 
Abstract
In recent years by increasing the terrorist threats and explosive operations in urban areas, protecting the important life line infrastructures against threats that arise from the explosion has become more important. Hence, predicting the extent of the destructive power of the explosion and its effects on soil layers necessitates further studies and researches. In order to reduce stress caused by the explosion and to control increasing compressive and shear stresses in the soil and lateral pressure on the pipes, several solutions have been presented. One of these solutions is utilizing geosynthetic reinforcement. In reinforced soils, the mechanism of stress transfer is based on the interaction of soil and reinforcement elements. The shear stress reaction causes tensile forces in reinforcement elements. This phenomenon leads to an increment of shear strength, elasticity and ductility of the reinforced soil. In this study, FEM method is used for modeling pipelines buried in the reinforced sandy soil exposed to surface blast loading. By comparing the results, it can be concluded that by using reinforcement in the soil, the stresses and deformations in the buried pipeline could be reduced. The results show that the deformation rate obtained from the placement of reinforcements at a depth of 1.5 m from the ground level (with a fixed width), has decreased by an amount of 35%. In addition, the rate of reduction in deformation of the pipe crest has decreased about 51% using a 4 meter wide reinforcement at a constant depth of 1 meter.

 
Keywords
Explosive; Buried Pipelines; Reinforced Soil; Geosynthetics; FEM
References

[1]     Yang, Z. “Finite Element Simulation of Response of Buried Shelters to Blast Loadings”; Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 1997, 24, 113-132.

[2]     Gui, M. W.; Chien, M. C. “Blast-Resistant Analysis for a Tunnel Passing beneath Taipei Shongsan Airport - a Parametric Study”; Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2006, 24, 227–248.

[3]     Huabei, L. “Dynamic Analysis of Subways Structures under Blast Loading”; Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2009, 27, 699–711.

 [4]     Olarewaju, A. J.; Kameswara Rao, N. S. V.; Mannan, M. A. “Blast Effects on Underground Pipes”; J. Geotech. Eng. 2010, 15, 645-658.

[5]     Olarewaju, A. J.; Kameswara Rao, N. S. V.; Mannan, M. A. “Dimensionless Response of Underground Pipes Due to Blast Loads Using Finite Element Method”; J. Geotech. Eng.  2011, 16, 563-574.

[6]     Nourzad, D.; Khorshid. S.; Takada, S.; Bargi, K. “Analytical Proposal to Damage Assessment of Buried Continuous Pipelines during External Blast Loading”; Int. Sci. Index, Civil and Environ. Eng. 2011, 5, 516–520.

[7]     Olarewaju, A. J. “Effects of Accidental Explosions on Low Stiffness Pipes Buried in Undrained Clay”; J. Geotech. Eng. 2012, 17, 101-111.

[8]     Massah, S. R.; Torabipour, M. M. “Numerical Simulation of the Response of Underground Structures to Shock Waves”; Adv. Defence Sci. Technol. 2015, 3, 163-170. (In Persian)

[9]     Hosseini Nassab, H.; Movahedifar, S. M. “Evaluation of Tunnel Burial Depth and Section Geometry on Decreasing Destructive Effects of Surface Blast”; Adv. Defence Sci. Technol. 2019, 2, 113-121. (In Persian)

[10]  Gamber, N. K. “Shallow Foundation Systems Response to Blast Loading”; Master’s Thesis, College of Engineering and Technology, Ohio University, Athens, 2004.

[11]  Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) “Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions”; 3-340-02 Technical Manual 5-1300, U.S. Dept. of Defense, Washington, DC, 2008.

[12]  Brode, H. L. “Numerical Solution of Spherical Blast Waves”; J. Appl. Phys. 1955, 26, 766-775.

[13]  Newmark, N. M.; Hansen, R. J. “Design of Blast Resistant Structures”; Shock and Vibration Handbook, Vol.3, C.M. Harris, Ed., New York, 1961.

[14]  Mills, C. A. “The Design of Concrete Structure to Resist Explosions and Weapon Effects”; Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Concrete for Hazard Protections, Concrete Society, London, 1987, 61-73.

[15]  US Army Engineers Waterways Experimental Station. TM5-855-1, “Fundamentals of Protective Design for Conventional Weapons”; Vicksburg, 1986.

[16]  Abaqus Inc. “ABAQUS/Standard User’s Manuals”; Version 6.13. Abaqus Inc., Providence, 2012.

[17]  Bagheri, B. “ABAQUS software Applied Reference”; Kiyanat Pulication, Tehran, 2013. (In Persian)

[18]  Koener, R. M. “Designing with Geosyntethics”; 5th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersy, USA, 2005.

[19]  Shukla, S. K. “Handbook of Geosynthetic Engineering”; ICE Publishing, London, 2012.

[20]  Shukla, S. K.; Yin, J. H. “Fundamentals of Geosynthetic Engineering“; Taylor and Francis, London 2006.

[21]  Ambrosini, D.; Luccioni, B. “Craters Produced by Explosions above the Soil Surface”; Mec´anica Computacional 2007, 27, 2253–2266.

Statistics
Article View: 610
PDF Download: 361