News

 Statistics

Number of Journals34
Number of Issues1,306
Number of Articles9,428
Article View9,191,889
PDF Download5,622,558
Ardini, M., Tamimi, A., Khodadadi, H., Bashiri, A., Bayrami, Y. (2021). The Design and Construction of an Acoustic Imaging System for Imaging Underground Facilities. Electronic and Cyber Defense, 9(1), 45-55.
Masoud Ardini; Ali Tamimi; Hamid Reza Khodadadi; Abbas Bashiri; Yahya Bayrami. "The Design and Construction of an Acoustic Imaging System for Imaging Underground Facilities". Electronic and Cyber Defense, 9, 1, 2021, 45-55.
Ardini, M., Tamimi, A., Khodadadi, H., Bashiri, A., Bayrami, Y. (2021). 'The Design and Construction of an Acoustic Imaging System for Imaging Underground Facilities', Electronic and Cyber Defense, 9(1), pp. 45-55.
Ardini, M., Tamimi, A., Khodadadi, H., Bashiri, A., Bayrami, Y. The Design and Construction of an Acoustic Imaging System for Imaging Underground Facilities. Electronic and Cyber Defense, 2021; 9(1): 45-55.

The Design and Construction of an Acoustic Imaging System for Imaging Underground Facilities

رادار
Article 5, Volume 9, Issue 1 - Serial Number 25, September 2021, Pages 45-55    PDF (2.27 M)
Document Type: Original Article
Authors
Masoud Ardini* 1; Ali Tamimi2; Hamid Reza Khodadadi3; Abbas Bashiri2; Yahya Bayrami2
1M.Sc., Hossein University, Tehran, Iran
2M.Sc., Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Iran
3Assistant Professor, Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Iran
Receive Date: 07 April 2021,  Revise Date: 13 October 2021,  Accept Date: 14 December 2021 
Abstract
As underground hidden facilities are used for various applications, imaging systems are required
for the detection and recognition of these facilities. In this paper, imaging by mechanical wave
propagation in the soil is investigated. Most underground facilities can be considered as air
chambers located in the middle of the soil. Air and soil have a large difference in acoustic
impedance, so underground facilities can produce a large reflective signal because the amplitude
of the reflected signal depends on the difference in impedance of the two materials. Seismic and
non-destructive concrete testing systems also use the process of propagation of mechanical
waves in the material. Although seismic systems have been successful in the detection issue,
they require several meters of space for equipment layout, and transportation complexity is also
one of their problems. They are unsuitable for urban space because they are inherently designed
to detect water sources at depths of several hundred meters. On the other hand, while the
non-destructive concrete testing system equipment have suitable dimensions, they have low
penetration depth which is impractical for this purpose. Seismic and non-destructive testing
systems of concrete operate in the range of subsonic and ultrasonic waves, respectively. This
research project proposes the idea that by choosing an operating frequency between the two
mentioned ranges, it is possible to obtain equipment with the appropriate dimensions for
imaging underground facilities. In this project we managed to image an underground
constructed cylindrical cavity with the diameter of 1 meter and the depth of 4 meters. The
accuracy of this method depends on the sound propagation speed in the material. Since there are
accurate relationships for the propagation speed of sound in air, the diameter of the cylinder was
estimated with an accuracy of about 4%, but with the measurement of propagation speed being
infeasible in this project, leading to the ambiguity in the value of propagation speed of sound in
soil, the values cited in several reference sites were used, giving the accuracy of 4 to 20%.
Keywords
Acoustic Impedance; Acoustic Imaging; Correlation Function
References

[1]  S. D. Sloan, S. L. Peterie, R. D. Miller, J. Ivanov, J. T. Schwenk, and  J. R. McKenna, “Detecting clandestine tunnels using near-surface seismic techniques,” GEOPHYSICS,  vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 127–135, 2015. 

[2]  A.  Ahmadpour,  R.  Ahmadi, and A. K. Rouhani, “Detection of Cylindrical Objects Using the GPR Method Based on Numerical Forward Modeling: A Case Study of the Buried Qanat,” J. Radar, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 37–50, 2017.

[3]  S. L. Walters, R. D. Miller, and  J. Xia, “Near surface tunnel detection using diffracted Pwaves: A feasibility study,” in SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2007, pp. 1128–1132, Jan. 2007.

[4]  S. D. Sloan et al., “Tunnel detection using near-surface seismic methods,” in SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2012, pp. 1–5, 2012.

[5]  G. Riddle, “Detection of Clandestine Tunnels using Seismic Refraction and Electrical Resistivity Tomography,” University of Alberta, 2012.

[6]  S. L. Peterie, R. D. Miller, J. Ivanov, and S. D. Sloan, “Shallow tunnel detection using SH-wave diffraction imaging,” GEOPHYSICS, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 29–37, 2020.

[7]  Y. Wang et al., “Tunnel detection at Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona, USA — Part 1: 2D full-waveform inversion experiment,” GEOPHYSICS, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 95–105, 2019.

[8]  D. H. Kim, U. Y. Kim, S. P. Lee, H. Y. Lee, and J. S. Lee, “Experimental studies of a geological measuring system for tunnel with ultrasonic transducer,” Geotech. Asp. Undergr. Constr. Soft Gr., pp. 536–537, 2009.

[9]  N. Dube, Introduction to Phased Array Ultrasonic Technology Applications. ‎ R/D Tech, 2004.

[10]      M. Moayeni and A. Y. Saadi, Non-destructive testing of ultrasonic method (ultrasonic). Atra, 2012.

[11]      T. Bourbié, O. Coussy, and B. Zinszner, Acoustics of Porous Media. CRC Press;, 1988.

[12]       R. J. Urick, Principles of Underwater Sound, 3rd ed. CA: Peninsula Publishing, 1983.

[13]       M. L. Oelze, W. D. O’Brien, and R. G. Darmody, “Measurement of Attenuation and Speed of Sound in Soils,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 788–796, 2002.

[14] Z. Shao, L. Shi, Z. Shao, and J. Cai, “Design and application of a small size SAFT imaging system for concrete structure,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 82, no. 7, p. 073708, 2011.

Statistics
Article View: 453
PDF Download: 441