News

 Statistics

Number of Journals34
Number of Issues1,306
Number of Articles9,427
Article View9,188,648
PDF Download5,620,936
Shariat, A. (2022). The Role of Passive Defense Against Agroterrorism Attacks in the Field of Natural Resources (Case Study of Fungal Agents). Electronic and Cyber Defense, 13(1), 57-68.
Anahita Shariat. "The Role of Passive Defense Against Agroterrorism Attacks in the Field of Natural Resources (Case Study of Fungal Agents)". Electronic and Cyber Defense, 13, 1, 2022, 57-68.
Shariat, A. (2022). 'The Role of Passive Defense Against Agroterrorism Attacks in the Field of Natural Resources (Case Study of Fungal Agents)', Electronic and Cyber Defense, 13(1), pp. 57-68.
Shariat, A. The Role of Passive Defense Against Agroterrorism Attacks in the Field of Natural Resources (Case Study of Fungal Agents). Electronic and Cyber Defense, 2022; 13(1): 57-68.

The Role of Passive Defense Against Agroterrorism Attacks in the Field of Natural Resources (Case Study of Fungal Agents)

پدافند غیرعامل
Volume 13, Issue 1 - Serial Number 49, August 2022, Pages 57-68    PDF (486.67 K)
Document Type: tarvigi
Author
Anahita Shariat*
Researcher, Ph.D. of plant breeding, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, I.R. Iran
Receive Date: 23 September 2021,  Revise Date: 19 October 2021,  Accept Date: 31 October 2021 
Abstract
Agroterrorism in natural resources mainly involves using various biological agents such as fungi, bacteria, viruses, and insects by terrorist groups to destroy forest trees and natural resources, create fear, economic losses, and reduce socio- political stability. Successful counter-terrorism policies have led to restrictions on the activities of terrorist organizations resulted, agroterrorism attacks increased. The increase of such threats is directly related to the progress of genetic engineering and biological science methods, which the adversaries exploit. In such situations, agricultural and natural resources research institutes are in a unique position to assist information and military organizations. They can identify threats and use agricultural biotechnology and plant immunology to strengthen the safety of products against pathogens. The purpose of this research is to show how passive defense can be used as an indicator to emphasize the increase in the ability to prevent, detect and discover, react and recover natural resources against agroterrorism actions. This research was descriptive, analytical and practical in terms of type, and the sample population based on Cochran's formula included 108 professors and students in the field of natural resources. After collecting the information, a questionnaire consisting of 11 questions related to the research variables was prepared. The results of the research showed that passive defense can quickly prevent the spread of damage and destruction in the field of natural resources by timely detection of the threat. Passive defense with the provision and operation of the central laboratory, careful monitoring of the country's borders, periodic and regular monitoring of various regions, and the creation of databases will be effective.
Keywords
Agroterrorism; Biosafety; Agriculture; Immunology
References
  • Suffert, É. Latxague, and I. Sache, “Plant Pathogens as Agroterrorist Weapons: Assessment of the Threat for European Agriculture and Forestry,” Food Sec., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 221–232, 2009.##
  • Amid, “Amid Persian Dictionary,” 38th Ed. Tehran: Amirkabir Publishing, 1284 p, 1390. (Persian)##
  • Evans and R. Newnham. “The Dictionary of International Relations,” Penguin Publishing, 640 p, 1998.##
  • Shabaninejad, A. Bali, I. Soltany, and H. Fayazi, “Principle of Passive Defense of the Power System against Electromagnetic Threats,” Passive Defense, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 65-88, 2021.##
  • Bahmani and M. E. Minaei, “The Study of Molecular Detection Systems of PCR-Based Biological Threats with Field Applications,” Passive Defense, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 97-105, 2019.##
  • R. M. Paterson, “Fungi and Fungal Toxins as Weapons,” Mycol. Res., vol. 110, pp. 1003–1010, 2006.##
  • Radosavljevic, “Primordial and Primary Levels of Biothreat and Bioterrorism Prevention,” NATO Sci. for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology, pp. 95–108, 2018.##
  • Zamir, “Farewell to the Lose–Lose Reality of Policing Plant Imports,” PLoS Biol., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 10–15, 2016.##
  • J. Jansen, F. J. Breeveld, C. Stijnis, and M. P. Grobusch, “Biological Warfare, Bioterrorism, And Biocrime,” Clin. Microbiol. Infect., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 488–496, 2014.##
  • W. Schaad, J. Abrams, L. V. Madden, R. D. Frederick, D. G. Luster, V. D. Damsteegt, and A. K. Vidaver, “An Assessment Model for Rating High-threat Crop Pathogens,” Phytopathol., vol. 96, pp. 616–621, 2006.##
  • Latxague, I. Sache, J. Pinon, D. Andrivon, M. Barbier, and F. Suffert, “A Methodology for Assessing the Risk Posed by the Deliberate and Harmful Use of Plant Pathogens in Europe,” EPPO Bulletin, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 427–435, 2007.##
  • Madden and M. Wheelis, “The Threat of Plant Pathogens as Weapons against U.S. Crops,” Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., vol. 41, pp. 155–176, 2003.##
  • Whitby, “Biological Warfare against Crops,” Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 99-70, 1999.##
  • A. Zilinskas, “Cuban Allegations of Biological Warfare by the United States: Assessing the Evidence,” CRC Crit. Rev. Microbiol., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 173–227, 1999.##
  • Gilligan, R. Fraser, C. Godfray, N. Hanley, S. Leather, T. Meagher, T. Mumford, J. Petts, N. Pidgeon, and C. Potter, “Final Report. Tree Health and Plant Biosecurity Expert Taskforce”, Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, UK, vol. 44 (May), 2013.##
  • H. Cordesman, “Iraq’s Past and Future Biological Weapons Capabilities,” CSIS Middle East Dynamic Net Assessment, 20006 (202), pp. 17-20. 1998.##
  • Fletcher, C. Bender, B. Budowle, W. T. Cobb, and S. E. Gold, “Ishimaru, Plant Pathogen Forensics: Capabilities, Needs, and Recommendations,” Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 450–471, 2006.##
  • J. Connick, D. J. Daigle, A. B. Pepperman, K. P. Hebbar, R. D. Lumsden, T. W. Anderson, and D. C. Sands, “Preparation of Stable, Granular Formulations Containing Fusarium Oxysporum Pathogenic to Narcotic Plants,” Biol. Control, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 79–84, 1998.##
  • R. O’Neill, J. C. Jennings, B. A. Bailey, and D. F. Farr, “Dendryphion Penicillatum and Pleospora Papaveracea, Destructive Seedborne Pathogens and Potential Mycoherbicides for Papaver Somniferum,” Phytopathol., vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 691–698, 2000.##
  • Olson, “Agroterrorism: Threats to America's Economy and Food Supply. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin,” Retrieved from http://leb.fbi.gov/2012/february/agro terrorism-threats-toamericas-economy-and-food-supply, 2012.##
  • S. Schubert, S. A. Rizvi, X. Sun, T. R. Gottwald, J. H. Graham, and W. N. Dixon, “Meeting the Challenge of Eradicating Citrus Canker in Florida again,” Plant Dis. vol. 85, pp. 340–356, 2001.##
  • Levy, V. Damsteegt, and R. Welliver, “First Report of Plum Pox Virus (Sharka Disease) in Prunus Persica in the United States,” Plant Dis., vol. 84, 202 p., 2000.##
  • E. Dowell, T. N. Boratynski, R. E. Ykema, A. K. Dowdy, and R. T. Staten, “Use of Optical Sorting to Detect Wheat Kernels Infected with Tilletia indica,” Plant Dis., vol. 86, pp.1011–1013, 2002.##
  • Shariat, H. Mirzaie-Nodoushan, M. Mirza, Z. Zare, H. Keneshloo, and F. Taghavi, “An Ionome Study in Persian Oak (Quercus brantii Lindl) To Evaluate Factors Affected Oak Decline,” Iran J. For, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 415-428, 2019.##
  • Mirabolfathy, Y. Ahangaran, L. Lombard, and P.W. Crous, “Leaf Blight of Buxus sempervirens in Northern Forests of Iran Caused by Calonectria Pseudonaviculata,” Plant Dis., vol. 97, 1121 p., 2013.##
  • Sagheb Talebi, “Integrated Project on Box Blight and Conservation of Genetic Resources of Boxwood (Buxus Hyrcana Pojark) in the Hyrcanian forests of Iran,” Final Report of Project, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, 142 p. 2018.##
  • Farahani, “Bioecological Study and Biological Control Factors of Box Tree Moth, Cydalima Perspectalis (Walker, 1859) in Hyrcanian Forests,” Final Report of Project, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, 68 p. 2020.##
  • Ranjbar Aghdam, R. Marzban, A. Mohammadipour, and S. Shabanali Maafi Pashakolaei “An Introduction to the Biology of the Box Tree Moth, Cydalima Perspectalis in Iran and its Control,” Final Report of Project, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, 17 p, 2018##
  • J. DaSilva, “Biological Warfare, Bioterrorism, Biodefence and the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention,” Electron. J. Biotechnol., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 4–34, 1999.##
  • Jurica, J. Vrdoljak, and I. B. Karačonji, “Food Defence Systems as an Answer to Food Terrorism,” Arh Hig Rada Toksikol, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 232–255, 2019.##
  • Forrest, “The Growing Threat of Agroterrorism and Strategies for Agricultural Defense,” Senior Honors Theses 979, 32 p, 2020.##
  • D. Mumford, A.W. Leach, J. Holt, F. Suffert, I. Sache, B. Moignot, and R. A. Hamilton, “Integrating Crop Bioterrorism Hazards into Pest Risk Assessment Tool, In: Practical Tools for Plant and Food Biosecurity,” Springer, Switzerland, pp. 121-142, 2017.##

 

Statistics
Article View: 2,467
PDF Download: 1,563