News

 Statistics

Number of Journals34
Number of Issues1,306
Number of Articles9,428
Article View9,192,009
PDF Download5,622,629
Aynehband, M., Hosseinzadeh, M., Zarrabi, H., Gorgin, S. (2022). Presentation of a model for feasibility assessment of implementing the IoT social network projects using the existing public social networks as the infrastructure. Electronic and Cyber Defense, 10(1), 73-84.
Meghdad Aynehband; Mehdi Hosseinzadeh; Houman Zarrabi; Saeid Gorgin. "Presentation of a model for feasibility assessment of implementing the IoT social network projects using the existing public social networks as the infrastructure". Electronic and Cyber Defense, 10, 1, 2022, 73-84.
Aynehband, M., Hosseinzadeh, M., Zarrabi, H., Gorgin, S. (2022). 'Presentation of a model for feasibility assessment of implementing the IoT social network projects using the existing public social networks as the infrastructure', Electronic and Cyber Defense, 10(1), pp. 73-84.
Aynehband, M., Hosseinzadeh, M., Zarrabi, H., Gorgin, S. Presentation of a model for feasibility assessment of implementing the IoT social network projects using the existing public social networks as the infrastructure. Electronic and Cyber Defense, 2022; 10(1): 73-84.

Presentation of a model for feasibility assessment of implementing the IoT social network projects using the existing public social networks as the infrastructure

پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری
Article 6, Volume 10, Issue 1 - Serial Number 37, May 2022, Pages 73-84    PDF (963.98 K)
Document Type: Original Article
Authors
Meghdad Aynehband* 1; Mehdi Hosseinzadeh2; Houman Zarrabi3; Saeid Gorgin4
1Instructor, Mahshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahshahr, Iran
2Assistant Professor, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3Assistant Professor, Iran Telecommunication Research Center, Tehran, Iran
4Associate Professor, Scientific and Industrial Research Organization of Iran, Tehran, Iran
Receive Date: 15 May 2021,  Revise Date: 28 October 2021,  Accept Date: 13 December 2021 
Abstract
The novel approach of using social networks as the infrastructure to reduce the cost of IoT projects has challenges as well as benefits. This research provides a method for designing an event detection / prediction system based on the proposed model, which in comparison to the previous researches, takes a closer look at this system and, examines the conditions of using this system in various scenarios more carefully. The network size, the time measurement between two samplings of conditions and its transmission to the data storage server, and the limitation of receiving data by common social networks’ APIs are some of the conditions that this research has addressed. For the purpose of cost reduction, we have investigated using social networks as the means of storage and retrieval of the generated data by the IoT projects. Obviously, the use of this infrastructure will have undesirable side effects. This study has examined these side effects and presented a compromise between the cost reduction and the undesirable side effects. The results show that by using methods such as increasing multiple accounts and reducing the number of samples sent per second, the existing social network infrastructure can be used as the infrastructure of large IoT projects.
Keywords
Internet of Things; Social Networks; Cost Reduction; Event Detection; Event prediction
References

[1]         J. Pashaei Barbin, S. Yousefi, and B. Masoumi, “Navigation in the social internet-of-things (SIoT) for discovering the influential service-providers using distributed learning automata,” J. Supercomput., pp. 1–28, Mar. 2021.

[2]         M. Aynehband, M. Hosseinzadeh, H. Zarrabi, and S. Gorgin, “Accuracy and availability modeling of social networks for Internet of Things event detection applications,” Wirel. Networks, vol. 25, no. 7, 2019.

[3]         L. Atzori, A. Iera, G. Morabito, and M. Nitti, “The social internet of things (SIoT) - When social networks meet the internet of things: Concept, architecture and network characterization,” Comput. Networks, vol. 56, no. 16, pp. 3594–3608, 2012.

[4]         L. Atzori, A. Iera, and G. Morabito, “SIoT: Giving a Social Structure to the Internet of Things,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1193–1195, Nov. 2011.

[5]         and G. M. L. Atzori, A. Iera, “Making things socialize in the Internet—Does it help our lives?,” Proc. ITU Kaleidosc. Fully Networked Human?—Innovations Futur. Networks Serv., pp. 1–8, 2011.

[6]         A. M. Ortiz, D. Hussein, S. Park, S. N. Han, and N. Crespi, “The Cluster Between Internet of Things and Social Networks: Review and Research Challenges,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 206–215, Jun. 2014.

[7]         A. Pintus, D. Carboni, and A. Piras, “PARAIMPU: A platform for a social web of things,” in Proceedings of the 21st international conference companion on World Wide Web - WWW ’12 Companion, 2012, p. 401.

[8]         D. Guinard, M. Fischer, and V. Trifa, “Sharing using social networks in a composable Web of Things,” in 2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2010, pp. 702–707.

[9]         I. Lequerica, M. Longaron, and P. Ruiz, “Drive and share: efficient provisioning of social networks in vehicular scenarios,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 90–97, Nov. 2010.

[10]       N. Mäkitalo et al., “Social devices: collaborative co-located interactions in a mobile cloud,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia - MUM ’12, 2012, p. 1.

[11]       H. Saberi, M. R. Kangavari, and M. R. H. Ahangar, “Providing an Agent-Based Architecture for Semantic Mining From Large-Scale Data in Distributed Environments,” J. Electron. Cyber Def., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 83–99, 2020. (in persian)

[12]       M. Hasan, M. A. Orgun, and R. Schwitter, “A survey on real-time event detection from the Twitter data stream,” J. Inf. Sci., no. November 2015, p. 016555151769856, 2017.

[13]       M. Shahossein and Aminoallah Mahabadi, “Concurrent Detection of Condense Anomalous Subgraphs in Large Social Networks,” Electron. Cyber Def., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 179–194, 2021.(in persian)

[14]       L. Atzori, D. Carboni, and A. Iera, “Smart things in the social loop: Paradigms, technologies, and potentials,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 18, pp. 121–132, Jul. 2014.

[15]       C. Zhang, C. Cheng, and Y. Ji, “Architecture design for social web of things,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Context Discovery and Data Mining - ContextDD ’12, 2012, p. 1.

[16]       A. Ciortea, O. Boissier, A. Zimmermann, and A. M. Florea, “Reconsidering the social web of things,” in Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication - UbiComp ’13 Adjunct, 2013, pp. 1535–1544.

[17]       M. Mohammadrezaei, “Detecting Fake Accounts on Social networks using Principal Components Analysis and Algorithm Kernel Density Estimation (A case study on the Twitter social network),” Electron. Cyber Def., 2021. (in persian)

[18]       C. L. Henley, “Statics of a ‘self-organized’ percolation model,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 71, no. 17, pp. 2741–2744, Oct. 1993.

[19]  J. Chaharlang, M. Mosleh, and S. R. Heikalabad, “Proposing a New and Comprehensive Method for Quantum Representation of Digital Audio Signals,” J. Electron. Cyber Def., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 139–152, 2021.

Statistics
Article View: 629
PDF Download: 340