News
Statistics
| Number of Journals | 34 |
| Number of Issues | 1,306 |
| Number of Articles | 9,427 |
| Article View | 9,188,656 |
| PDF Download | 5,620,946 |
Iran-America Confrontation: Strategies and Tactics | ||
| فصلنامه آفاق امنیت | ||
| Article 2, Volume 11, Issue 40, October 2018, Pages 39-69 PDF (1.51 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| Authors | ||
| Farshad Roomi* 1; Ehsan Kazemi2 | ||
| 1Corresponding author: assistant professor of International Relations, Shahid Chamran University of Ahwaz | ||
| 2Assistant professor of political science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz | ||
| Receive Date: 18 October 2018, Revise Date: 23 February 2019, Accept Date: 06 March 2019 | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Through a revolutionary culture, the Islamic Republic of Iran, as a genuine revisionist power, has eliminated the arrogant attendance of the US in the domain of Iranian politics since 1979, and has challenged regional and international issues. In response to this revolutionary attitude, various American governments have resorted to the policy of undermining and overthrowing Iranian political system. Following the nuclear deal between Iran and world powers, this idea emerged that the relation between the two countries cooperation in other areas would improve. However, with the advent of Trump administration and his pulling out of Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), tensions between the two countries have augmented and Washington is trying to force Tehran to give up. Hence, the main question of this research is: “What are the components and characteristics of the US strategies against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and what strategies should be selected by Iran to stand against them?” This research hypothesizes that America tries to destabilize and overthrow Iran at both internal and external levels through a political war. At the internal level, America makes use of illegitimating Iran’s political power by public dissatisfaction. The United States seeks to destabilize Iran's geopolitical and geo-strategic credibility in the region. The best solution for addressing this challenge is due to reinforcing the internal components of power, that is, its efficiency or the secondary legitimacy of the system.” The theoretical framework of the research contains the theory of political warfare, the theory of soft warfare, and Habermas’s public sphere. This is a descriptive-analytical research which employs library and documentary methods for data collection. The results indicates that the United States is in trying to exerting maximum pressure for overthrowing the Iranian political system by internal devastation and external decrease of its regional influence. Therefore, we can conclude that threats against Iran's political stability are serious, and that the efficiency and legitimacy of the system need to be strengthened to neutralize it. Furthermore, the researchers have employed scenario writing to test the impact of the independent variable (techniques of overthrowing) on the dependent variable (the future of the political system). The authors also use scenario method to test the effect of independent variable (subversion tactics) on the dependent variable (the future of the political system). Research findings suggest that the United States is seeking to destabilize the Iranian government and the elimination of Iran's regional influence. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| political warfare; irregular warfare; Trump; efficiency; secondary legitimacy | ||
| References | ||
|
Bipartisan Policy Center (2018). U.S. Policy toward Iran: Strategic Options, Report of the Task Force on Managing Disorder in the Middle East, Pp.1-35. Available at: https://bipartisanpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/ BPC-National-Security-Strategic-Options-on-Iran.pdf
Brewer, Eric & others (2019). A Realistic Path for Progress on Iran, The Center for a New American Security, Pp.1-42, Available at: https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/a-realistic-path-for-progress-on-iran
Bromund, Theodore R. (2018). Will Trump’s Iran Strategy Work? , Available at: https://www.heritage.org/middle-east/commentary/will-trumps-iran-strategy-work
Burnz, William & Sullivan, Jake (2018).Trump's Iran Reset, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/2018/01/08/trump-s-iran-reset-pub-75190
Center for Preventive Action, (2019). The Top Conflicts to Watch in 2019: Iran, Council on Foreign Relations Available at: https://www.cfr.org/blog/top-conflicts-watch-2019-iran
Council on Foreign Relations (2018). The Iran Fault Line, The Rita Hauser Annual Event, Available at: https://www.cfr.org/event/iran-fault-line.
Dubowitz, Mark (2018). Trump Delivers a Victory to Iran, Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/12/us-withdrawal-syria-hands-victory-iran/578962/
Dubowitz, Mark (2019). Midterm Assessment: Iran, Available at: https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2019/01/31/midterm-assessment-iran/
Edelman, Eric & Wald, Charles & Others (2018). Comprehensive U.S. Strategy toward Iran after the JCPOA,JINSA’s Gemunder Center Iran Task Force; Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, Pp. 1-16. Available at: http://www.jinsa.org/files/ComprehensiveUSStrategyTowardIranAfterJCPOA.pdf.
Gompert, David C. & Binnendijk, Hans (2016). The Power to Coerce: Countering Adversaries without Going to War,Published by the RAND Corporation, p.1-52, Available at: https://www.rand.org/ content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1000/RR1000/RAND_RR1000.pdf
Itani, Faysal (2018). What Exactly is the US Policy Toward Iran? , Available at: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/syriasource/what-exactly-is-the-us-policy-toward-iran
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambriidge: The MITP.
Hanson, Victor (2018). U.S. Has Leverage in Dealings with Iran and North Korea,Available at: https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/05/america-has-options-to-deter-north-korea-iran-threats/#slide-1
Katz, Mark N. (2010). Russian-Iranian Relations in the Obama Era. Middle East Policy, Vol. XVII, No. 2, summer, pp.62-69.
Katzman K & others, (2010), Iran: Regional Perspectives and U.S. Policy, Congressional Research Service.
Nye, Joseph S. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power, Vol. 616, Public Diplomacy in a Changing World, pp. 94-109.
Nye, Joseph S (1991). Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. NY: Basic Books.
Maloney, Suzanne, (2017), The Roots and Evolution of Iran’s Regional Strategy, Atlantic council, Available at: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/images/ The_Roots_and_Evolution_of_Irans_Regional_Strategy_web_0928.pdf
Pollack, Kenneth (2018). Pushing back on Iran: A different approach, Available at: http://www.aei.org/publication/pushing-back-on-iran-a-different-approach/
Pompeo, Mike (2018). After the Deal: A New Iran Strategy, May 21, 2018, Available at: https://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2018/05/282301.htm
Robinson, Linda (2018). Modern Political Warefare, Published by the RAND Corporation,
Sharp, Paul, (2005), Revolutionary State , Outlaw Regimes and the Techniques of Public Diplomacy, the New Public Diplomacy Soft Power in International Relations, edited by Jan Melissen , Hampshire : Palgrave.
Shepp, Jonah (2018). Trump’s Iran Strategy: Regime Change on the Cheap, Foreign Policy, July 30. Available at: http://nymag.com/intelligencer/ 2018/07/trumps-iran-strategy-regime-change-on-the-cheap.html
US Intelligence Community) 2019(. Statement for the Record: Worldwide Threat Assessment,Pp.1-42. Available at: https://www.odni.gov/index.php/ newsroom/congressional-testimonies/item/1947-statement-for-the-record-
Velibeyoglu, K. (1999). Public Realm in the Information Age. Diss. For Ph.D Cadidateat: Izmir Institute of Technology.
Walt, Stephen M. (2018). Regime Change for Dummies, Foreign Policy, May 14. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/14/regime-change-for-dummies/.
Weiss, Michael and Hannah Stuart (2011). The Syrian Opposition: Political Analysis with Original, Foreign Policy, May 04 | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 928 PDF Download: 825 |
||