اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات34
تعداد شماره‌ها1,306
تعداد مقالات9,427
تعداد مشاهده مقاله9,188,646
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله5,620,932
حقیقی بروجنی, پیام, صفدری رنجبر, مصطفی, کریمی, تورج, جعفری, سید محمد باقر. (1404). بازاندیشی در نگاشت نهادی نظام ملی نوآوری ایران؛ یک گونه شناسی جدید مبتنی بر کارکردهای دانشی. پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری, 8(2), 86-104. doi: 10.47176/smok.2025.1859
پیام حقیقی بروجنی; مصطفی صفدری رنجبر; تورج کریمی; سید محمد باقر جعفری. "بازاندیشی در نگاشت نهادی نظام ملی نوآوری ایران؛ یک گونه شناسی جدید مبتنی بر کارکردهای دانشی". پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری, 8, 2, 1404, 86-104. doi: 10.47176/smok.2025.1859
حقیقی بروجنی, پیام, صفدری رنجبر, مصطفی, کریمی, تورج, جعفری, سید محمد باقر. (1404). 'بازاندیشی در نگاشت نهادی نظام ملی نوآوری ایران؛ یک گونه شناسی جدید مبتنی بر کارکردهای دانشی', پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری, 8(2), pp. 86-104. doi: 10.47176/smok.2025.1859
حقیقی بروجنی, پیام, صفدری رنجبر, مصطفی, کریمی, تورج, جعفری, سید محمد باقر. بازاندیشی در نگاشت نهادی نظام ملی نوآوری ایران؛ یک گونه شناسی جدید مبتنی بر کارکردهای دانشی. پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری, 1404; 8(2): 86-104. doi: 10.47176/smok.2025.1859

بازاندیشی در نگاشت نهادی نظام ملی نوآوری ایران؛ یک گونه شناسی جدید مبتنی بر کارکردهای دانشی

مدیریت راهبردی دانش سازمانی
مقاله 4، دوره 8، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 29، تیر 1404، صفحه 86-104    اصل مقاله (1.4 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی با اصالت
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.47176/smok.2025.1859
نویسندگان
پیام حقیقی بروجنی1؛ مصطفی صفدری رنجبر* 2؛ تورج کریمی3؛ سید محمد باقر جعفری3
1دکتری، مدیریت سیستم‌ها، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران
2استادیار بخش مدیریت صنعتی و فناوری، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران
3دانشیار بخش مدیریت صنعتی و فناوری، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران
تاریخ دریافت: 16 دی 1403،  تاریخ بازنگری: 23 اسفند 1403،  تاریخ پذیرش: 03 تیر 1404 
چکیده
هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر بازاندیشی در نگاشت نهادی نظام ملی نوآوری ایران بر اساس کارکردهای دانشی است.
روش پژوهش: در مرحله اول برمبنای مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای عمیق و بررسی اسناد بالادستی و گزارشات داخلی و بین‌المللی مطرح در این حوزه، بازیگران فعال در نظام ملی نوآوری ایران شناسایی و در 8 دسته اصلی قرار گرفتند. در مرحله دوم پژوهش و مبتنی بر روش نگاشت نهادی بازیگر – کارکرد، نگاشت نهادی نظام ملی نوآوری ایران در وضعیت موجود و بر اساس کارکردها و نقش‌های دانشی، ترسیم شد.
یافته‌ها: نگاشت ترسیم شده یک تصویر کلی از وضعیت حال حاضر تعاملات دانشی بازیگران نظام ملی نوآوری را نمایش داده و نقاط قوت و قابل بهبود را جهت سیاستگذاری و انجام مطالعات آتی در این حوزه مشخص می‌نماید.
نتیجه‌گیری: یکی از نقاط تمایز اصلی شناسایی شده بین نظام ملی نوآوری ایران با سایر کشورها، تعریف و نقش آفرینی سطوح بالاتری نظیر نهاد رهبری، مجمع تشخیص مصلحت نظام، شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی و مجلس شورای اسلامی قرار گرفته که فراتر از دولت و بالاتر از لایه سیاست‌گذاری و نهادهای حاکم است و منجر به تعریف یک دسته از بازیگران در سطح بالاتر با ویژگی عناصر راهبردی و سیاست گذاری با عنوان ارکان راهبری است.
اصالت/ارزش: حضور مجدد و پررنگ عناصر راهبردی و سیاست‌گذار نظام ملی نوآوری ایران و ساختار دولتی در قالب ارگان‌ها، سازمان‌ها و مراکز زیر مجموعه در لایه های دیگر منجر به کاهش نقش بازیگران غیر دولتی و غیر حاکمیتی نظام نوآوری ایران شده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
بازیگران؛ کارکردهای دانشی؛ نظام ملی نوآوری؛ نقش های دانشی؛ نگاشت نهادی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Rethinking the institutional mapping of Iran's national innovation system; A new typology based on knowledge functions
نویسندگان [English]
Payam Haghighi Boroujeni1؛ Mostafa Safdari Ranjbar2؛ Toraj Karimi3؛ Seyed Mohammadbagher Jafari3
1Ph.D. in Systems Management, Department of Management and Accounting, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran
2Assistant Professor, Department of Management and Accounting, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran
3Assistant Professor, Department of Management and Accounting, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran
چکیده [English]
Purpose: The national innovation system is a kind of systemic approach to innovation and includes elements and components that interact with each other to produce, disseminate, and use new and economically beneficial knowledge and operate within the borders of a country. According to this definition, the flow of knowledge is considered one of the main active flows between the actors of the national innovation system of each country. This research seeks to draw and present the institutional mapping of Iran's national innovation system based on knowledge functions. For this purpose, due to the lack of a comprehensive model and framework in the field of the national innovation system and existing literature, first, the past research achievements and internal documents in the form of reports, plans, and studies were considered. In this regard, study sources related to the subject were collected and analyzed. To adapt the previous theoretical framework to the current state of Iran's national innovation system, actors were identified and the institutional mapping of the existing state of Iran's national innovation system was drawn based on knowledge functions. By entering the step of adapting the theoretical framework, the differences between the national innovation system of Iran with other innovation systems and other countries were identified. The current research is applied in terms of purpose and development research, and considering that qualitative data such as data obtained from collaborative interviews, library documents, etc. are used in this research, the type of research is qualitative. Also, the current research strategy is a combined survey-based strategy based on documentary studies and surveys (expert review).
Methodology: To achieve this goal, the research consists of three executive steps. In the first step, based on a detailed study of the literature and a review of the theoretical framework of the national innovation system, while examining the functions and knowledge roles of the actors of the national innovation system in general, active actors in the national innovation system of Iran, according to the study of upstream documents and domestic and international reports presented in this The areas were identified and placed in 8 main categories. In the second stage of the research and based on the combined cognitive mapping method of institutions-functions, the institutional mapping of the national innovation system of Iran was drawn in the current state based on functions and knowledge roles. The drawn map will show a general picture of actors' knowledge interactions and provide the strengths and points that can be improved for future studies in this field. Finally, to ensure the results and findings of the research, in the third step, the opinion of experts and specialists in knowledge management and policy-making of science, technology, and innovation, actors, and the institutional mapping of function-actor was confirmed.
Findings: According to the elements presented and the initial identification, in the policy-making layer and governing institutions of Iran's national innovation system, in addition to the government structure, there are higher levels such as the Leadership, the Expediency Discernment Council, the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution and the Islamic Consultative Assembly, which go beyond The government is placed at this level and influences the performance of the national innovation system from a management point of view. By examining the institutional mapping of the national innovation system in other countries, this difference has been revealed and one of the main characteristics of the national innovation system of Iran is the existence of this level and actors in the policy-making layer as elements of leadership and policy-making. Therefore, it is necessary to place a group of actors under the title of leadership elements, at a higher level of the government and in the field of leadership and policy-making elements, and the government consisting of related ministries and the relevant deputy is placed at a lower level and in the field of formal institutional elements (execution).
Research limitations/implications: The present study faced a lack of similar studies focused on the flow of knowledge and its corresponding functions in the national innovation system. Although extensive and numerous international and domestic studies have been conducted in the field of the national innovation system with different perspectives in the last decade and extensive theoretical knowledge has been produced in this field, it was difficult to find scientific and documented documents that have made efforts in this direction. On the other hand, the complexity and multiplicity of actors and their interactions in the national innovation system of Iran also made it difficult to draw an accurate and comprehensive institutional map based on knowledge functions.
Originality/value: This research seeks to draw and present an institutional mapping of the Iranian national innovation system based on knowledge functions. For this purpose, given the lack of a comprehensive model and framework in the field of the national innovation system and the existing literature, first of all, past research achievements and internal documents and documentation in the form of reports, plans and studies were considered. Considering the main approach in choosing the type of institutional mapping, which was based on the knowledge functions of the national innovation system and the institution-function matrix, the institutional mapping of the Iranian national innovation system has been drawn. The relationships drawn in the aforementioned mapping are based on the governance perspective and the role of the elements of governance, policy-making and regulation in other roles and actors.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Players, Knowledge Functions, National Innovation System, Knowledge Roles, Institutional Mapping
مراجع

Abbaszadeh, M. (2011). A reflection on validity and reliability in qualitative research. Applied Sociology (Isfahan University Humanities Research Journal), 23(1), 19-34. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20085745.1391.23.1.2.5  (In Persian)

Abdi, M., Hasanzadeh, A., Fani, A.A. and Ghodsi Poor, S.H., (2014). Exploring the bottleneck of Iran's national innovation system by TOC thinking process. Technological and economic development of economy, 20(4), 601-623. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.880960

Ahunjonov, U., Asa, A.R. and Amonboyev, M., (2013). An Empirical Analysis of SME Innovativeness Characteristics in an Emerging Transition Economy: The Case of Uzbekistan. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(32), 129-135.

Amitrano, C.C., Coppola, M., Tregua, M. and Bifulco, F., (2017). Knowledge sharing in innovation ecosystems: a focus on functional food industry. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14(05), 1750030. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877017500304

Arthur, D., Moizer, J., & Lean, J. (2023). A systems approach to mapping UK regional innovation ecosystems for policy insight. Industry and Higher Education, 37(2), 193 207.  https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222221115977

Bacon, E., Williams, M.D. and Davies, G.H., (2019). Recipes for success: Conditions for knowledge transfer across open innovation ecosystems. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 377-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.012

Chu, M.T. and Fardoei, S.R., (2014), June. Knowledge Communication Indicators from Knowledge Management to National Innovation System. In Proceedings of International Academic Conferences (No. 0201329). International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.

Chu, M.T., Fardoei, S.R., Fallah, H., Ghazinoory, S. and Aliahmadi, A., 2014. Modeling national innovation system enabled by knowledge management. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 15(5), 964-977. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2013.764923

Costa, V., Monteiro, S., & Costa, V. (2016). Key knowledge management processes for innovation: a systematic literature review. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 46 (3). https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-02-2015-0017

Edler Jakob, Yeow Jillian. (2016). Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation, Research Policy, 45 (2), 414-426,

Edquist, C. and Hommen, L. eds., 2009. Small country innovation systems: globalization, change and policy in Asia and Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Fait, M., Magni, D., Perano, M., Farina Briamonte, M. and Sasso, , (2023). Grassroot processes of knowledge sharing to build social innovation capabilities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(5), 1390-1408.

Fallah, H, Ghazinoori, S, Rezaiyan Fardoei, Seddiqe, & Ali Ahmadi, A. (2013). Modeling the relationship between knowledge management functions and performance indicators of the national innovation system. Strategy Scientific Quarterly, 23(2). (In Persian)

Fartash, K, Safdari Ranjbar, M, & Ghorbani, A. (1402). Analysis of the functions of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology in the national innovation system; A mixed research. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 13(48), 142-170. (In Persian)

Ghazanfari, R., & Aliahmadi, A. (2019). Innovation Systems in Iran: Challenges and Approaches. International Journal of Industrial Engineering & Supply Chain Management, 6(1), 1–23.

Ghazinoori, S, Afshari Mofard, M, Elahi, Sh, & Soltani, B. (2017). Evaluation of inter-institutional relations in Iran's national innovation system: a study of 8 cases. Public Policy, 4(1), 9-35.

Gloet, M. and Samson, D., 2016, January. Knowledge and innovation management: Developing dynamic capabilities to capture value from innovation. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (  4282-4291). IEEE.

Haghigi Borojni, P, Karimi, T, Safdari Ranjbar, Mo, and Jafari, M. B. (2023). providing the framework of knowledge functions and actors of the national innovation system; Systematic synthesis of research. Organizational Knowledge Management, 6(20), 49-94. (In Persian)

Haghighi Borujeni, Payam, & Tavallaee, Rouhollah. (2023). Interpretive Structural Modeling "Organizational Knowledge Map Development". Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 5(4), 45-11. . (In Persian)

Hamdouch, A. and Moulaert, F., (2006). Knowledge infrastructure, innovation dynamics, and knowledge creation/diffusion/accumulation processes: a comparative institutional perspective. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 19(1), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610600607676

Hosseini Bamkan, Seyed Mojtaba, Soleimanizadeh, Hajar, & Ziaeian, Mehran. (2024). SAnalyzing the function of metaverse technology in the retention and absorption of knowledge using the integrated approach of interpretive structural modeling and structural equations (Case of study: Electricity industry of the country). Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 7(2), 133-164. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2024.1723  (In Persian)

Hodavand, M, Fateh Rad, M, and Tabatabayian, H. (2015). Analysis of the policy-making process in Iran's national innovation system using the framework of institutional mapping. Strategic and macro policies, 4(16), 1-18. (In Persian)

Kalantari, I, & Montazer, Gh. (2015). Concepts, approaches and methods of institutional mapping (with emphasis on innovation system studies). Rahyaft, 26(62). (In Persian)

Liu, T. H. (2019). The philosophical views of national innovation system: The LED industry in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Management Review, 24(4), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.10.003

Manteghi, Manouchehr, Ahmadi, Maryam, & Bushehri, Alireza. (2024). Presenting a conceptual model of knowledge sharing and networking of knowledge-based companies in the lithium battery value chain. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 7(3), 87-109. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2024.1769 (In Persian)

Makkonen, T. (2019). Advanced Introduction to Regional Innovation Systems. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 73(5), 318–319.

Mesbahi Jahormi, N. S, Adibzadeh, M. (2014). Impact of Knowledge Management System on Organizational Innovation: Investigating the Role of Organizational Learning. Scientific studies, 2(5). (In Persian)

Mohammadi, A, Sotoudeh, F. (2013). A Comparison of National Innovation Systems’ Efficiency in Iran and Countries Mentioned in 20-Year Perspective Document. Strategic management studies. Fifth year, winter 2013, number 20. 38-49. (In Persian)

Mousavi, A, Ahmadi, H. (2019). Extracting the main features of Iran's national innovation system through the Systematic synthesis of research. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 10(34), 102-127. (In Persian)

Nasri Nasrabadi, Sh, Kazemi, H, and Khaledi, A. (2019). Comparing the efficiency of Iran's national innovation system with selected countries with an emphasis on opening the black box of innovation and a historical look at the state of the national innovation system in Iran. Management Improvement, 14(2(48)), 33-66. (In Persian)

National Audit Office (NAO) (2009) Innovation across Central Government. The Stationery Office, London.

Nowrozi, E, Tabatabaian, H, & Ghazinoori, S. (2015). Evaluating the impact of intermediary institutions' functions in eliminating the weaknesses of Iran's national innovation system. Science and Technology Policy, 9(1), 15-26. (In Persian)

Nunn, R. (2019). The innovation ecosystem and knowledge management: A practitioner’s viewpoint. Business Information Review, 36(2), 70–74

Obrenovic, B. and Jalilov, S., (2014). Building a better national innovation system through effective knowledge sharing: A case of Croatia. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 1(1), 41-51.

OECD (1997). National Innovation Systems Book.

Samara, E., Georgiadis, , & Bakouros, I. (2012). The impact of innovation policies on the performance of national innovation systems: A system dynamics analysis. Technovation, 32(11), 624–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation

Soltani, B, Haji Hosseini, H, Arasti, M. R, Ghazinoori, S, Razavi, M. R, Shafia, M. A, Manouchehr, M., Tabatbaian, H and Shawardi, M. (2016). An overview of the challenges of Iran's national innovation system and presenting policies and solutions for improvement. Strategic studies of public policy. (In Persian)

Soltanzadeh, J, Heydari, K, Dabaghi, H. A, Esmaili, H and Reza, A (2015). Functional analysis of Iran's innovation system based on selected studies. Farda Management scientific research journal, 15th year, winter 1995. (In Persian)

Tabatabaei, S., Aqdam, B., Mehrzadegan, E. and Kheiri, N., 2015. The role of knowledge management practices in development of innovative performance of organization. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3 (6), 447-460.

Velu, C., (2015). Knowledge management capabilities of lead firms in innovation ecosystems. AMS review, 5, 123-141.

Viotti, E.B., 2002. National learning systems: a new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea. Technological forecasting and social change, 69(7), 653-680.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 53
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 48