اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات33
تعداد شماره‌ها1,334
تعداد مقالات9,644
تعداد مشاهده مقاله9,842,252
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله6,059,471
عبدشاهی, علی اصغر, رضایی ارجمند, حجت, وحیدیان قزوینی, شروین. (1404). مدل‌سازی غیرخطی تعامل عوامل اخلاقی، فرهنگی و ساختاری بر نیت افشای دانش حساس با روش سطح پاسخ: مقایسه انسان و هوش مصنوعی. پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری, (), 89-113. doi: 10.47176/smok.2025.1929
علی اصغر عبدشاهی; حجت رضایی ارجمند; شروین وحیدیان قزوینی. "مدل‌سازی غیرخطی تعامل عوامل اخلاقی، فرهنگی و ساختاری بر نیت افشای دانش حساس با روش سطح پاسخ: مقایسه انسان و هوش مصنوعی". پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری, , , 1404, 89-113. doi: 10.47176/smok.2025.1929
عبدشاهی, علی اصغر, رضایی ارجمند, حجت, وحیدیان قزوینی, شروین. (1404). 'مدل‌سازی غیرخطی تعامل عوامل اخلاقی، فرهنگی و ساختاری بر نیت افشای دانش حساس با روش سطح پاسخ: مقایسه انسان و هوش مصنوعی', پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری, (), pp. 89-113. doi: 10.47176/smok.2025.1929
عبدشاهی, علی اصغر, رضایی ارجمند, حجت, وحیدیان قزوینی, شروین. مدل‌سازی غیرخطی تعامل عوامل اخلاقی، فرهنگی و ساختاری بر نیت افشای دانش حساس با روش سطح پاسخ: مقایسه انسان و هوش مصنوعی. پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری, 1404; (): 89-113. doi: 10.47176/smok.2025.1929

مدل‌سازی غیرخطی تعامل عوامل اخلاقی، فرهنگی و ساختاری بر نیت افشای دانش حساس با روش سطح پاسخ: مقایسه انسان و هوش مصنوعی

مدیریت راهبردی دانش سازمانی
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 08 مهر 1404    اصل مقاله (1.57 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی با اصالت
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.47176/smok.2025.1929
نویسندگان
علی اصغر عبدشاهی* 1؛ حجت رضایی ارجمند2؛ شروین وحیدیان قزوینی3
1دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران
2گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اراک، ایران
3دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد فیزیک کاربردی، گروه فیزیک کاربردی، دانشکده فیزیک و کیهان‌شناسی، دانشگاه بلونیا، بلونیا، ایتالیا
تاریخ دریافت: 30 اردیبهشت 1404،  تاریخ بازنگری: 12 مرداد 1404،  تاریخ پذیرش: 01 مهر 1404 
چکیده
هدف: با توجه به افزایش اهمیت شفافیت، پاسخ‌گویی و مقابله با فساد در سازمان‌های دولتی، افشای آگاهانه دانش حساس به‌عنوان یک رفتار داوطلبانه و اخلاق‌مدار در بطن خط‌مشی‌گذاری عمومی اهمیت یافته است. این پژوهش با هدف مدل‌سازی تأثیر توأمان و غیرخطی سه متغیر «تمایل اخلاقی فردی»، «فرهنگ اشتراک دانش اخلاقی» و «موانع ساختاری اشتراک دانش» بر «نیت افشای دانش حساس» و مقایسه الگوی انسانی با مدل هوش مصنوعی گروک-3 در بین کارکنان ادارات خدماتی استان لرستان انجام شد.
روش پژوهش: تحقیق حاضر از نوع کاربردی- توصیفی و آزمایشی است و با بهره‌گیری از طراحی مرکب مرکزی و روش سطح پاسخ انجام گرفت. جامعه آماری شامل 700 نفر از کارکنان ادارات خدماتی استان لرستان و حجم نمونه 385 نفر بود که با روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها پرسش‌نامه سناریو محور با ۱۵ ترکیب سه‌سطحی بر اساس و مقیاس لیکرت ۷ درجه‌ای برای سنجش نیت افشای دانش بود. روایی محتوایی با نظر پنج متخصص و پایایی با ضریب آلفای کرونباخ 86/0 تأیید شد. داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار دیزاین اکسپرت نسخه 13 و برازش مدل درجه دوم تحلیل شدند.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد هر سه متغیر مستقل در سطح 1 درصد اثر معناداری بر نیت افشا دارند. ضریب مربعی «تمایل اخلاقی فردی» منفی و معنادار بود که نشان‌دهنده اشباع اثر آن در سطوح بالا است، در حالی که «فرهنگ اشتراک دانش اخلاقی» و «موانع ساختاری» اثری خطی و مستقیم داشتند. مدل هوش مصنوعی نیز روند مشابهی را نشان داد ولی ضریب خطی «تمایل اخلاقی» را بیش از دو برابر تخمین زد. در شرایط بهینه (تمایل=۷، فرهنگ=۷، موانع=۱)، نیت افشا در مدل انسانی برابر 55/5 و در مدل هوش مصنوعی برابر ۷ محاسبه شد که حدود ۲۶ درصد تفاوت را نشان می‌دهد.
نتیجه‌گیری: نیت افشای دانش حساس متأثر از ترکیب اخلاق فردی، زمینه فرهنگی و موانع ساختاری است و در شرایط بهینه نیز به‌طور کامل تحقق نمی‌یابد. یافته‌ها بیانگر آن است که هوش مصنوعی در شناسایی روندهای کلی عملکرد قابل قبولی دارد، اما نمی‌تواند پیچیدگی‌های روان‌شناختی و اجتماعی کارکنان را به‌طور کامل بازنمایی کند.
اصالت/ارزش: این پژوهش نخستین مطالعه ایرانی است که با استفاده از ترکیب روش سطح پاسخ و مدل زبانی گروک-3 به تحلیل غیرخطی و مقایسه انسان–هوش مصنوعی در حوزه افشای دانش حساس می‌پردازد. استفاده هم‌زمان از سناریوهای طراحی‌شده، مدلسازی سطح پاسخ و الگوریتم‌های زبانی پیشرفته، مرزهای رایج روش‌شناسی در تحلیل‌های رفتاری را توسعه می‌دهد و زمینه تدوین خط‌مشی‌های هوشمندانه‌تری را برای ارتقاء شفافیت سازمانی فراهم می‌سازد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
افشای دانش حساس؛ رفتار سازمانی؛ ساختار سازمانی؛ روش سطح پاسخ؛ مدل‌سازی غیرخطی؛ مدیریت دانش؛ هوش مصنوعی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Nonlinear Modeling Of The Interaction Of Ethical, Cultural, And Structural Factors On The Intention To Disclose Sensitive Knowledge Using Response Surface Methodology: A Human Versus AI Comparison
نویسندگان [English]
Ali Asghar Abdeshahi1؛ Hojat Rezaei Arjmand2؛ Shervin Vahidian Qazvini3
1Ph.D. Candidate in Public Administration, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
2Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
3Master's Student in Applied Physics, Department of Applied Physics, Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
چکیده [English]
Purpose: Public sector organizations today operate under intensifying demands to uphold ethical standards, mitigate corruption, and ensure public trust. Whistleblowing—the deliberate, principled disclosure of sensitive internal information such as financial irregularities, misconduct, or policy violations—serves as a vital corrective tool. However, the decision to blow the whistle is not driven by a single stimulus; instead, it emerges from a complex nexus of factors. An individual’s moral inclination, shaped by personal values and integrity, provides the foundational readiness to report wrongdoing. Simultaneously, the prevailing ethical knowledge sharing culture within an organization either encourages or stifles such disclosures by signaling whether employees will be supported or ostracized. Finally, structural barriers—bureaucratic hurdles, opaque reporting procedures, fear of retaliation, and lack of legal safeguards—directly impede the act of disclosure. While prior research has examined these dimensions in isolation and largely through linear models, the present study addresses a critical gap by modeling their joint, potentially non linear influences on whistleblowing intention. Moreover, the advent of advanced language models, such as Grok 3, affords a unique opportunity to compare algorithmic predictions against actual human behavior. Accordingly, this research aims to (1) develop a comprehensive, non linear quantitative model capturing the combined effects of moral inclination, ethical culture, and structural barriers on whistleblowing intention among public service employees in Lorestan Province, Iran, and (2) evaluate the comparative predictive accuracy and limitations of human survey data versus Grok 3’s outputs under identical vignette scenarios.
Methodology: An applied, descriptive experimental field study was undertaken, employing Central Composite Design (CCD) in conjunction with Response Surface Methodology (RSM) to explore main, interaction, and quadratic effects. From a population of 700 service sector employees, a stratified random sample of 385 was determined via Cochran’s formula, ensuring sufficient statistical power. Data collection used a scenario based questionnaire featuring fifteen unique vignettes, each systematically varying three independent variables—individual moral inclination (A), ethical knowledge sharing culture (C), and structural barriers (B)—across low, medium, and high levels. Participants rated their likelihood to disclose sensitive knowledge on a seven point Likert scale (1 = “definitely would not” to 7 = “definitely would”). Content validity was confirmed through expert review by five scholars in knowledge management and organizational behavior, and internal consistency reliability was established with Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88 in a pilot test of 30 employees. In parallel, the same vignette scenarios were input into Grok 3 to generate AI based intention scores. Four regression frameworks—purely linear, two way interaction, quadratic (second degree), and cubic (third degree)—were fitted for both human and AI datasets using Design Expert 13. Model selection criteria included coefficient of determination (R²), adjusted R², ANOVA F tests, lack-of-fit tests, and sum of squared errors (SSE). The quadratic model demonstrated superior explanatory power (R² = 0.95 human; R² = 0.97 AI) with non significant lack-of-fit and was selected for detailed analysis. A composite utility function was then applied to pinpoint the optimal factor combination that maximizes whistleblowing intention.
Findings: The human‐based quadratic model explained 95% of variance in whistleblowing intention, with highly significant coefficients. Moral inclination (A) exhibited the most pronounced positive linear effect (coefficient = 0.96, p < 0.01), highlighting its central motivational role. Its accompanying negative quadratic term (–0.76, p < 0.05) revealed a saturation threshold beyond which additional moral motivation produced diminishing increases in disclosure intent—an effect seldom captured in linear analyses. Ethical knowledge sharing culture (C) registered a robust positive linear coefficient of 0.95 (p < 0.01) across all levels, with no evidence of saturation, signifying its consistent enabling function. Structural barriers (B) exerted a significant negative linear effect (–0.59, p < 0.01), indicating that each incremental barrier unit steadily suppresses willingness to report. Under the optimal conditions (A = 7, C = 7, B = 1), predicted human intention reached 5.55 on the seven point scale with a composite utility of 0.87. Grok 3’s quadratic model paralleled these trends but with distinct magnitudes: A’s linear coefficient was 1.64 (p < 0.01), B = –0.60 (p < 0.01), and C = 0.80 (p < 0.01). Notably, AI identified significant interactions: A×B (–0.375, p < 0.05) suggested that high moral drive combined with strong barriers markedly dampens intention, while A×C (0.225, p < 0.05) signified synergistic gains when moral drive aligns with a supportive culture. The AI quadratic A² term (–0.43, p < 0.05) reaffirmed saturation in moral motivation. Grok 3’s optimal predicted intention soared to 7.00, approximately 26% higher than human respondents, reflecting AI’s lack of psychosocial risk aversion and highlighting the complexity of real‐world disclosure decisions.
Research limitations/implications: The cross‐sectional vignette approach, though experimentally robust, cannot fully emulate the emotional stakes, group dynamics, and organizational politics of authentic whistleblowing. The geographic focus on a single province reduces the generalizability to distinct cultural, regulatory, or institutional contexts. Self‐report measures risk social desirability bias and cognitive fatigue, especially over multiple scenario evaluations. Grok 3’s opaque proprietary architecture precludes in‐depth understanding of how it weights and processes scenario information. Future research should incorporate longitudinal designs tracking actual disclosure behaviors, broaden samples across diverse settings, integrate objective whistleblowing records, and explore moderating influences such as employees’ perceived organizational support and individual risk tolerance.
Practical implications: This study furnishes a multi‐lever, evidence‐based roadmap for public sector management. First, cultivate intrinsic moral motivation via scenario‐based ethics training, peer support networks, and visible ethical leadership—but calibrate intensity to avoid motivational saturation. Second, strengthen an ethical knowledge‐sharing culture by embedding transparency in organizational mission statements, celebrating exemplary whistleblowers, and maintaining open communication channels for ethical concerns. Third, dismantle structural barriers through simplified, confidential reporting procedures, robust anti‐retaliation policies, and clear legal safeguards. While AI models like Grok 3 can support scenario planning and policy simulations, they must complement—rather than replace—human judgment, particularly where psychosocial and cultural nuances dictate employee risk calculations.
Originality/value: This research represents the first Iranian application of an integrated CCD RSM experimental design combined with a cutting‐edge large language model to analyze whistleblowing intentions. Departing from conventional linear regression, it uncovers novel saturation dynamics in moral motivation and maps intricate factor interactions. The introduction of a utility optimization metric offers actionable guidelines for calibrating moral, cultural, and structural interventions. By juxtaposing human survey data with AI predictions, the study elucidates both the promise and the limitations of AI in ethically sensitive organizational contexts, thereby advancing methodological frontiers in the study of organizational ethics and public governance.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Artificial Intelligence (AI), Knowledge Management, Nonlinear Modeling, Organizational Behavior, Organizational Structure, Response Surface Methodology, Sensitive Knowledge Disclosure
مراجع

Abdullah Sani, N., Sallehuddin, A. S., Salim, A. S. A., Devi, N., Mohanadas, & Yaakup, K., & Azman, H. (2020). The influence of individual factors on whistleblowing intention: The perspective of future internal auditors. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(12), 198–217.

Arabshehi, M., Kabiri, A., & Behboudi, O. (2022). The effect of top managers' knowledge value on knowledge sharing practices, open innovation, and organizational performance. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 5(1), 165–191. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2022.1413  (In Persian)

Atzmüller, C., & Steiner, P. M. (2010). Experimental vignette studies in survey research. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6(3), 128–138.

Azimi, H., Morshedi, A., & Abbasi, D. (2020). The role of organizational learning and business processes on knowledge-based performance of organizations (Case study: Zanjan Tax Office and Bojnourd Industry and Mine Organization). Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 3(2), 167–209. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2020.1117  (In Persian)

Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & García-Pérez, A. (2021). An integrative view of knowledge processes and a learning culture for ambidexterity: Toward improved organizational performance in the banking sector. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(2), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2917430

Cheliatsidou, A., Sariannidis, N., Garefalakis, A., Passas, I., & Spinthiropoulos, K. (2023). Exploring attitudes towards whistleblowing in relation to sustainable municipalities. Administrative Sciences, 13(9), 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13090199

Chua, K., Thinakaran, R., & Vasudevan, A. (2023). Knowledge sharing barriers in organizations – A review. TEM Journal, 12(1), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM121-24

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Dalkir, K. (2011). Knowledge management in theory and practice (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Feng, N., Huang, H., Tian, X., & Wang, Y. (2025). Configurational effects of organizational context factors on knowledge sharing in CoPS development. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2024-2412

Financial Times. (2025, February 18). Elon Musk's risqué Grok AI chatbot offers challenge to risk-averse rivals. Financial Times.

Fischer, C., & Döring, M. (2022). Thank you for sharing! How knowledge sharing and information availability affect public employees’ job satisfaction. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 35(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-10-2020-029

Hakimi, I. (2019). Investigating the effect of IT support for knowledge management on business performance: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 2(2), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2019.1015 (In Persian)

Hassani Ahangar, M. R., & Maqdisi, A. (2013). A study and introduction of artificial intelligence algorithms for solving optimization problems: Applications, advantages, and disadvantages. Passive Defence, 4(3), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.47176/pnd.2013.03   (In Persian)

Hassani Ahangar, M. R., Tavallaei, R., & Shadmanfar, M. H. (2023). Presenting the model of a wise core - a capable network for the role-playing of universities in the knowledge management of modern Islamic civilization issues based on imam khamenei's thought. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 6(4), 21-48. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2023.1659

He, H., & Wei, L. (2022). Preventing knowledge hiding behaviors through workplace friendship and altruistic leadership: The mediating role of positive emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 905890. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.905890

Hinkelmann, K., & Kempthorne, O. (1994). Design and Analysis of Experiments, Volume I: Introduction to Experimental Design. John Wiley & Sons.

Kang, M. M. (2023). Whistleblowing in the public sector: A systematic literature review. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 43(2), 381–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X221078784

Karimi, A., Ghaderi, S., & Moradinejad, E. (2020). A sociological study of the perception of administrative corruption and its social factors in particularistic cultures (Case study: Khorramabad city). Social Problems of Iran, 10(1), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijsp.2020.76175 (In Persian)

Laihonen, H., Kork, A. A., & Sinervo, L. M. (2023). Advancing public sector knowledge management: Towards an understanding of knowledge formation in public administration. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 22(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2023.2187719

Lu, Y., & Sinnott, R. O. (2020). Security and privacy solutions for smart healthcare systems. In Innovation in Health Informatics: A smart healthcare primer (pp. 189–216). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819043-2.00008-3

Moulton, E. E. (2020). The disclosure of sensitive information (Doctoral dissertation). Columbia University.

Naeiji, M. J., Ghorchi Beigi, E., Ghorbani Farab, M. T., & Seyed Alijaanlou, M. H. (2022). Examining the moderating role of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge in the relationship between intellectual capital dimensions and innovative performance (Case study: Dairy companies). Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 5(4), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2022.1460 (In Persian)

Nazari Zadeh, F., Farsijani, E., & Khazaiel, H. (2023). The future of artificial intelligence in organizational strategic management. Vital Sciences and Emerging Fields 1(1), 119–156. (In Persian)

Nicholls, A. R., et al. (2021). Snitches get stitches and end up in ditches: A systematic review of the factors associated with whistleblowing intentions. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631538

Potipiroon, W. (2024). Reward expectancy and external whistleblowing: Testing the moderating roles of public service motivation, seriousness of wrongdoing, and whistleblower protection. Public Personnel Management, 53(2), 309–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260231222814

Potipiroon, W., & Wongpreedee, A. (2020). Ethical climate and whistleblowing intentions: Testing the mediating roles of public service motivation and psychological safety among local government employees. Public Personnel Management, 50(3), 327–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026020944547

Rashid Alipour, Z., Ansari, M., & Seyed Javadin, S. R. (2019). Investigating the impact of knowledge management implementation on organizational performance (Case study: Pegah Dairy Company). Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 2(4), 113–151. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2019.1105   (In Persian)

Razmerita, L., Kirchner, K., & Nielsen, P. (2016). What factors influence knowledge sharing in organizations? A social dilemma perspective of social media communication. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(6), 1225–1246. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2016-0112

Reuters. (2025, February 18). Musk's xAI unveils Grok-3 AI chatbot to rival ChatGPT, China's DeepSeek. Reuters.

Saeed, I., Khan, J., Zada, M., Zada, S., Vega-Muñoz, A., & Contreras-Barraza, N. (2022). Linking ethical leadership to followers’ knowledge sharing: Mediating role of psychological ownership and moderating role of professional commitment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 841590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841590

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students (8th ed.).

Torabi, M. A., & Eghbal, H. (2024). Proposing an AI governance model for government governance in the Islamic Republic of Iran. State Studies of Contemporary Iran, 10(4), 11–42. https://doi.org/10.47176/cigs.2024.10411  (In Persian)

Valentine, S., & Godkin, L. (2019). Moral intensity, ethical decision making, and whistleblowing intention. Journal of Business Research, 98, 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.009

Valivand Zamani, H., & Mortezazadeh, A. (2024). Investigating the impact of artificial intelligence usage on managers’ decision making processes in organizational crisis management. Social Crisis Management, 16(2), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.47176/cms.2024.16211 (In Persian)

Wang, N., Chen, B., Wang, L., Ma, Z., & Pan, S. (2024). Big data analytics capability and social innovation: The mediating role of knowledge exploration and exploitation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 288. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03288-8

Wen, J., Zheng, J., & Ma, R. (2021). Antecedents of knowledge hiding and their impact on organizational performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 796976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.796976

Zia, B., Rezvani, M., & Ahmadian, Y. (2021). Investigating the factors affecting knowledge transfer and its impact on the innovation performance of international strategic alliances in small and medium-sized pharmaceutical businesses. Entrepreneurship Development, 13(4), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2021.307469.653430  (In Persian)

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 8
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1