| تعداد نشریات | 38 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,408 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,088 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 11,909,082 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,961,222 |
تأثیر قابلیتهای مدیریت دانش کلانداده بر نوآوری، مزیت رقابتی و عملکرد شرکتهای دانشبنیان (مورد مطالعه: شرکتهای دانشبنیان استان تهران) | ||
| مدیریت راهبردی دانش سازمانی | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 8، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 31، دی 1404، صفحه 1-21 اصل مقاله (1.41 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی با اصالت | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.47176/SMOK.2025.1966 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سید رضا سیدجوادین1؛ رسول نصرتپناه2؛ مبینا رحمانی گوهر* 3 | ||
| 1استاد، گروه بازاریابی و توسعه بازار، دانشکده مدیریت کسبوکار، دانشکدگان مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران | ||
| 2کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3دانشجوی دکتری، گروه بازاریابی و توسعه بازار، دانشکده مدیریت کسبوکار، دانشکدگان مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 22 مهر 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 21 آبان 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 24 آذر 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: با وجود رشد روزافزون کلانداده، بسیاری از شرکتهای دانشبنیان ایرانی در استفاده مؤثر از آن برای تقویت نوآوری و بهبود عملکرد با محدودیتهای جدی مواجهاند. استمرار این وضعیت میتواند با کاهش تجاریسازی محصولات، جایگاه رقابتی آنها را بیش از پیش تضعیف نماید. لذا این پژوهش با تبیین نقش میانجی قابلیت نوآوری، نوآوری فرایند کسبوکار و مزیت رقابتی، به بررسی تأثیر قابلیتهای مدیریت دانش کلانداده بر عملکرد این کسبوکارها پرداخته است. روش پژوهش: این پژوهش پارادایمی اثباتگرا، رویکردی قیاسی و هدفی کاربردی دارد و از نظر ماهیت و روش توصیفی-پیمایشی میباشد. جامعه آماری 5048 شرکت دانشبنیان استان تهران بودند. حجم نمونه با نرمافزار G-Power 3 ۳۱۳ شرکت تعیین شد. دادهها از طریق پرسشنامه استاندارد به روش تصادفی ساده طی یک پیمایش آنلاین جمعآوری شد. روایی از طریق روایی صوری و روایی سازه و پایایی از طریق آلفای کرونباخ (با ضریب 826/0)، پایایی ترکیبی (با ضریب 890/0) و پایایی همگون (با ضریب 865/0) تأیید شد. دادهها نیز با استفاده از مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری در نرمافزار SmartPLS 3 تحلیل شد. یافتهها: تأثیر قابلیتهای مدیریت دانش کلانداده به ترتیب با ضریب مسیر 329/0، 239/0، 425/0 و آماره تی 699/4، 010/3 و 749/6 در سطح اطمینان 99 درصد بر قابلیت نوآوری، نوآوری فرایند کسبوکار و مزیت رقابتی معنادار شد، اما تأثیر مستقیم این متغیر با ضریب مسیر 052/0 و آماره تی 985/0 بر عملکرد کسبوکار رد شد. تأثیر قابلیت نوآوری به ترتیب با ضریب مسیر 536/0، 443/0، 299/0 و آماره تی 632/9، 562/7 و 514/3 در سطح اطمینان 99 درصد بر نوآوری فرایند کسبوکار، مزیت رقابتی و عملکرد کسبوکار و تأثیر نوآوری فرایند کسبوکار به ترتیب با ضریب مسیر 165/0، 146/0 و آماره تی 360/2 و 071/2 در سطح اطمینان 95 درصد بر مزیت رقابتی و عملکرد کسبوکار تأیید گردید. بهعلاوه، تأثیر مثبت مزیت رقابتی بر عملکرد کسبوکار با ضریب مسیر 342/0 و آماره تی 517/5 در سطح اطمینان 99 درصد معنادار شد. در نهایت، نقش میانجی قابلیت نوآوری و نوآوری فرایند کسبوکار به ترتیب با ضریب مسیر 098/0، 035/0 و آماره تی 812/1 و 794/0 رد اما نقش میانجی مزیت رقابتی با ضریب مسیر 145/0 و آماره تی 013/2 در سطح اطمینان 95 درصد تأیید شد. نتیجهگیری: پژوهش حاضر نشان داد که قابلیتهای مدیریت دانش کلانداده به طور غیر مستقیم از طریق قابلیت نوآوری، نوآوری فرایند کسبوکار و مزیت رقابتی، عملکرد کسبوکارهای دانشبنیان را ارتقا میدهد. این یافتهها اهمیت تقویت قابلیتهای نوآوری و بهینهسازی فرایندهای کسبوکار در بهرهگیری اثربخش از کلانداده و حفظ جایگاه رقابتی شرکتهای دانشبنیان را برجسته میکند. اصالت/ارزش: این پژوهش برای نخستین بار با بررسی تأثیر قابلیتهای مدیریت دانش کلانداده بر عملکرد شرکتهای دانشبنیان ایرانی، شواهد تجربی منحصر به فردی از این شرکتها ارائه داد که ضمن پر نمودن شکافهای موجود در ادبیات نظری و عملی، بینش نوینی از پویایی نوآوری و رقابت فراهم میآورد. | ||
تازه های تحقیق | ||
| ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| شرکتهای دانشبنیان؛ عملکرد کسبوکار؛ کلانداده؛ مدیریت دانش؛ مزیت رقابتی؛ نوآوری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Impact of Big Data Knowledge Management Capabilities on Innovation, Competitive Advantage, and the Performance of Knowledge-Based Enterprises (Case Study: Knowledge-Based Enterprises in Tehran Province) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Seyed reza Seyed javadin1؛ Rasoul Nosratpanah2؛ Mobina Rahmani Gohar3 | ||
| 1Prof., Department of Business Management, Faculty of Business Management, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2MSc., Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3PhD student, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Business Management, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Purpose: Despite the rapid growth in the production and utilization of big data and its vast potential for enhancing innovation and improving performance, many Iranian knowledge-based enterprises (KBEs) still face serious challenges in effectively leveraging this strategic resource. If such limitations persist, they are likely to weaken these firms’ competitive positions in today’s turbulent business environment by reducing product commercialization. A review of the existing literature indicates that most prior studies have been conducted in developed countries, and their findings are not necessarily applicable to Iran’s local context. Moreover, much of the research has focused only on partial relationships among the variables, with limited attention given to developing and testing a comprehensive conceptual model that explains the entire value-creation pathway from big data knowledge management capabilities (BDKMC) to business performance (BP). Accordingly, this study seeks to address this research gap and provide empirical evidence within the context of Iranian KBEs. Therefore, this study examines the impact of BDKMC on BP by clarifying the mediating roles of innovation capability (IC), business process innovation (PI), and competitive advantage (CA). This study aims to deliver an integrated and precise picture of how big data can be intelligently harnessed to foster innovation, build CA, and enhance BP. Methodology: This study was designed and conducted within a positivist paradigm, following a deductive reasoning approach. In terms of purpose, it is categorized as applied research, while methodologically, it is descriptive in nature and implemented as a cross-sectional survey. The population of interest comprised 5,048 knowledge-based companies in Tehran Province. To ensure adequate statistical precision and reduce the likelihood of Type I and Type II errors, the minimum sample size was estimated using G*Power 3. Based on four predictor variables, a significance level of 0.05, an effect size of 0.05, and a statistical power of 0.90, the required sample size was determined to be 313. The unit of analysis was company managers, with one questionnaire administered to each firm in the sample. Sampling was conducted using a simple random sampling procedure using the random sampling function in SPSS. Data were collected using a standardized instrument consisting of 47 items. The research model was analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in SmartPLS 3. In the preliminary stage, factor loadings were inspected to ensure that all exceeded the minimum threshold of 0.40. The model evaluation was conducted in three steps: measurement, structural, and overall models. Within the measurement model, internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, rho_A, and composite reliability (CR) values. Convergent validity was examined using the average variance extracted (AVE), while discriminant validity was assessed using both the Fornell–Larcker criterion and the Heterotrait–Monotrait ratio (HTMT). In the structural model, the predictive capability was first evaluated through the explained variance (R²) and Stone–Geisser’s Q² (predictive relevance). The study hypotheses were then tested. Finally, the overall model fit was assessed using three key indices: the root mean square residual covariance (RMStheta), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), and goodness-of-fit (GOF) index. Together, these indices ensured the robustness and reliability of our proposed conceptual model. Findings: The results revealed that BDKMC significantly affected IC (β = 0.329, t = 4.669), BPI (path coefficient = 0.239, t = 3.010), and CA (β = 0.425, t = 6.749). However, the direct effect of BDKMC on BP was not supported (β = 0.052, t = 0.985). Furthermore, IC has significant positive effects on BPI (β = 0.536, t = 9.632), CA (β = 0.443, t = 7.562), and BP (β = 0.299, t = 3.514). In addition, BPI significantly influenced both CA (β = 0.165, t = 2.360) and P (β = 0.146, t = 2.071) in this study. Finally, CA had a strong and significant impact on BP (path coefficient = 0.342, t = 5.517). Regarding the mediation effects, the mediating roles of IC and BPI were not supported (β = 0.098 and 0.035; t = 1.812 and 0.794, respectively). However, the mediating role of CA was confirmed (β = 0.145, t = 2.013). Research limitations: Despite its theoretical and practical contributions, this study is subject to several limitations, which provide avenues for future research. First, reliance on self-reported data from managers of knowledge-based firms may introduce response bias. Future work could enhance validity by employing multi-method approaches, such as in-depth case studies and semi-structured interviews, to reveal the more nuanced mechanisms of value creation through big data knowledge management. Second, the geographical and industrial scope—focusing on firms in Tehran Province and analyzing heterogeneous industries without differentiation—may limit the generalizability of the findings. Expanding geographical coverage, conducting cross-national comparisons, and pursuing industry-specific studies could address this issue while exploring variations across technological domains and organizational life-cycle stages. Third, the cross-sectional design restricts causal inference and leaves room for reverse or bidirectional effects to be observed. Longitudinal designs can offer stronger causal insights. Fourth, the dynamic nature of environments and the rapid evolution of big data technologies may constrain the measurement validity. Data mining, document and social media content analysis, updated measurement instruments, and novel theoretical perspectives may help mitigate this concern. Fifth, the lack of distinction among firms in terms of size, age, technological focus, and business models may obscure relevant differences. Future research could employ cluster analysis, multigroup analysis, or multilevel modeling to uncover subgroup-specific patterns and test the conceptual framework accordingly. Finally, the insignificant mediating effects highlight the need for further investigation to capture the complexity of relationships and provide a more holistic understanding of the value creation process. Practical implications: This study’s findings offer several practical insights for managers and policymakers in KBEs. First, they highlight the critical role of BDKMC in enhancing innovation and creating CA, suggesting that firms should strategically invest in knowledge management systems and processes to fully leverage their data resources. Second, the results indicate that IC and the BPI serve as key mechanisms through which the BDKMC impacts BP. Therefore, managers should focus not only on technological adoption but also on fostering a culture of continuous innovation and process improvement to translate data-driven insights into tangible performance results. Third, the confirmed mediating role of CA underscores the importance of aligning innovation and process initiatives with strategic objectives to sustain superior performance in dynamic business environments. Collectively, these insights provide actionable guidance for KBEs aiming to optimize their big data strategies, strengthen their innovation pipelines, and enhance their overall organizational competitiveness and performance. Originality/value: This study, for the first time, investigates the impact of BDKMC on the performance of Iranian KBEs and provides unique empirical evidence from these companies. The findings address existing gaps in both theoretical and practical literature and offer novel insights into the dynamics of innovation and competitive advantage within this context. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Knowledge-Based Enterprises, Business Performance, Knowledge Management, Competitive Advantage, Innovation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adiguzel, Z., Sonmez Cakir, F., & Özbay, F. (2025). Big data analytics capability and sustainability in company innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2024-0231 Aftab, J., Wei, F., Srivastava, M., Abid, N., & Ishaq, M. I. (2025). Intermediating mechanisms and market conditions in big data knowledge management for enhanced market performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 219, 124266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124266 Ahmed, W., Najmi, A., & Ikram, M. (2020). Steering firm performance through innovative capabilities: A contingency approach to innovation management. Technology in Society, 63, 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101385 Akter, S., Hossain, M. A., Sajib, S., Sultana, S., Rahman, M., Vrontis, D., & McCarthy, G. (2023). A framework for AI-powered service innovation capability: Review and agenda for future research. Technovation, 125, 102768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102768 Cadden, T., Weerawardena, J., Cao, G., Duan, Y., & McIvor, R. (2023). Examining the role of big data and marketing analytics in SMEs innovation and competitive advantage: A knowledge integration perspective. Journal of Business Research, 168, 114225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114225 Canbul, A., & Çemberci, M. (2023). Innovation capability as key to competitive advantage: Relation of product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and firm performance. Journal of International Trade, Logistics and Law, 9(1), 134-142. https://www.jital.org/index.php/jital/article/view/345 Celik, D., & Uzunçarşılı, Ü. (2023). Is the effect of organizational ambidexterity and technological innovation capability on firm performance mediated by competitive advantage? An empirical research on Turkish manufacturing and service industries. Sage Open, 13(4), 21582440231206367. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231206367 Chatzoglou, P., & Chatzoudes, D. (2018). The role of innovation in building competitive advantages: an empirical investigation. European journal of innovation management, 21(1), 44-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2017-0015 Daneshjoovash, S.K., Jafari, P., Khamseh, A. and Saber, M.H. (2024). Entrepreneurial ideas of information and communication technology: commercialization in post-COVID-19 era. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-04-2023-0049 Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Rivera León, L., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (Eds.). (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023: Innovation in the face of uncertainty. Geneva: WIPO. https://tind.wipo.int/record/48588?ln=en&v=pdf Dymitrowski, A., & Mielcarek, P. (2021). Business model innovation based on new technologies and its influence on a company’s competitive advantage. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(6), 2110-2128. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16060118 Elgarhy, S. D., & Abou-Shouk, M. (2023). Effects of entrepreneurial orientation, marketing, and innovation capabilities, on market performance: The mediating effect of sustainable competitive advantage. International journal of contemporary hospitality management, 35(6), 1986-2004. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-04-2022-0508 Ferraris, A., Mazzoleni, A., Devalle, A., & Couturier, J. (2019). Big data analytics capabilities and knowledge management: impact on firm performance. Management Decision, 57(8), 1923-1936. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2018-0825 Ferreira, J., Coelho, A., & Moutinho, L. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation, 92, 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2018.11.004 Grant, R., & Phene, A. (2022). The knowledge based view and global strategy: Past impact and future potential. Global Strategy Journal, 12(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1399 Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15 Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2024). Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2e). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://tore.tuhh.de/handle/11420/52983 Hanaysha, J. R., Al-Shaikh, M. E., Joghee, S., & Alzoubi, H. M. (2022). Impact of innovation capabilities on business sustainability in small and medium enterprises. FIIB Business Review, 11(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145211042232 Hao, S., Zhang, H., & Song, M. (2019). Big data, big data analytics capability, and sustainable innovation performance. Sustainability, 11(24), 7145. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247145 Hitt, M. A., Xu, K., & Carnes, C. M. (2016). Resource based theory in operations management research. Journal of operations management, 41, 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.002 Hoseinzadeh Shahri, M. and Shahini, S. (2018). The impact of Dynamic Capability and Innovation Capability on Competitive Advantage. Journal of Business Administration Researches, 10(19), 123-141. (In Persian). https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.2645386.1397.10.19.6.5 Jalalzadeh, S. R. , Bayramzadeh, S. & Jalili, S. (2025). Examining the impact of artificial intelligence, product innovation, and process innovation on firm performance, considering the moderating role of leadership support. Journal of Intelligent Strategic Management, 4(3), 287-294. (In Persian) https://doi.org/bumara.3.2.1155844.350254 Karimi, S. M., Mousavi, S. N., Vahdati, H., & Sepahvand, R. (2024). Market-oriented knowledge management program in production cooperatives; Identifying critical success factors and consequences of implementation with FCM method (Case Study: production cooperatives). Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 7(3), 67-86. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2024.1776 Kiyabo, K., & Isaga, N. (2020). Entrepreneurial orientation, competitive advantage, and SMEs’ performance: application of firm growth and personal wealth measures. Journal of innovation and entrepreneurship, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-020-00123-7 Konjkav Monfared, A. R., Saeida Ardakani, S., Malekpour, L., Barootkoob, M., & Mohebali Malmiri, M. (2020). Analyzing the Impact of Technological Innovation and Resource Commitment on Knowledge Management Capabilities to Increase the Competitive Advantage (Case Study: Knowledge Based Companies in Yazd Province). Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 3(3), 147-175. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2020.1211 Korayim, D., Chotia, V., Jain, G., Hassan, S., & Paolone, F. (2024). How big data analytics can create competitive advantage in high-stake decision forecasting? The mediating role of organizational innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199, 123040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123040 León, O., de la Fuente, D., Fernandez-Vazquez, S., & Puente, J. (2024). Big data analytics capabilities: direct and mediating relationships with innovative and business performance. Journal of Management Analytics, 11(2), 182-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2024.2328522 Li, B., Teece, D. J., Baskaran, A., & Chandran, V. G. R. (2025). Dynamic Knowledge Management: A dynamic capabilities approach to knowledge management. Technovation, 147, 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103316 Lozada, N., Arias-Pérez, J., & Henao-García, E. A. (2023). Unveiling the effects of big data analytics capability on innovation capability through absorptive capacity: why more and better insights matter. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 36(2), 680-701. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-02-2021-0092 Maldonado-Guzmán, G., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Pinzón-Castro, S. Y., & Kumar, V. (2019). Innovation capabilities and performance: are they truly linked in SMEs?. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(1), 48-62. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-12-2017-0139 Migdadi, M. M. (2022). Knowledge management processes, innovation capability and organizational performance. International journal of productivity and performance management, 71(1), 182-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2020-0154 Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2020). Examining the interplay between big data analytics and contextual factors in driving process innovation capabilities. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 260-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1740618 Mikalef, P., Boura, M., Lekakos, G., & Krogstie, J. (2019). Big data analytics capabilities and innovation: the mediating role of dynamic capabilities and moderating effect of the environment. British journal of management, 30(2), 272-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12343 Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., Pappas, I. O., & Pavlou, P. (2020). Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities. Information & management, 57(2), 103169. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IM.2019.05.004 Milovanović, B., Primorac, D., & Kozina, G. (2016). Two-dimensional analysis of the influence of strategic networking on entrepreneurial orientation and business performance among SMEs. Tehnički vjesnik, 23(1), 247-255. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20150428210214 Mirghafoori, S. H., Aghazade Bafgh, M., & Saffari Darberazi, A. (2024). Designing a cognitive model of retaining knowledge workers in technological and knowledge-based companies of Yazd Science and Technology Park. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 7(3), 29-54. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2024.1779 Nasrollahi, M., Ramezani, J., & Sadraei, M. (2021). The impact of big data adoption on SMEs’ performance. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 5(4), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5040068 Nosratpanah, R. , Barani, S. , Ashrafzadeh, A. and Atashi, G. (2024). The effect of dynamic service innovation capabilities on firm performance: the moderating role of perceived environmental dynamism and the mediating role of service innovation and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Management, 16(1), 137-166. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/jibm.2023.355935.4546 Omat Mohammadi,, S. V., Hajianvari, L., & Mohaqeq, K. (2025). Developing a model for integrating artificial intelligence (AI) to change the organization’s public relations unit’s processes, with an emphasis on organizational knowledge management. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 8(1), 33-52. (In Persian) http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/smok.2025.1856 Paovangsa, S., Kamil, M., Aaqil, M., & Xing, K. (2025). Assessing innovation capability, innovation types, and its impact on innovation performance in FDI enterprises: configurational recipes for laos. SAGE Open, 15(3), 21582440251365311. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251365311 Piñera-Salmerón, J., Sanz-Valle, R., & Jiménez-Jiménez, D. (2023). Product and business process innovation, competitive advantage and export performance. Multinational Business Review, 31(4), 545-564. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-03-2022-0045 Qaderi Mehrbani, A. (2025, 15 July) Investigating the relationship between process innovation and competitive advantage in small and medium-sized industries. In the 24th National Conference on Economics, Management and Accounting, Shirvan, Iran. (In Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/2333879 Qerimi, D., Demeter, K., & Losonci, D. (2024). Unravelling the definition of business process innovation: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Innovation Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-02-2024-0038 Rahimi, H., & Lotfi, H. (2022). Investigating the mediating role of knowledge management in the effect of social capital and absorption capacity on the performance of financial companies. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 5(4), 111-144. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2022.1487 Rehman, S. U., Elrehail, H., Taamneh, A., Alsaad, A., & Al-Adaileh, R. (2024). Antecedents and consequences of big data knowledge management. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(2), 100265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100265 Sahoo, S. (2019). Quality management, innovation capability and firm performance: Empirical insights from Indian manufacturing SMEs. The TQM Journal, 31(6), 1003-1027. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-04-2019-0092 Saide, S., & Sheng, M. L. (2020). Toward business process innovation in the big data era: A mediating role of big data knowledge management. Big data, 8(6), 464-477. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2020.0140 Saraswati, T. T., & Sudarmiatin, S. (2024). The role of product innovation on usiness performance thought competitive advantage as mediation variable. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 5(2), 1581-1592. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v5i2.635 Sarstedt, M., & Moisescu, O. I. (2024). Quantifying uncertainty in PLS-SEM-based mediation analyses. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(1), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-023-00231-9 Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587-632). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15 Seyed Javadin, S. R., Nosratpanah, R., & Ashrafzadeh, A. (2025). The influence of knowledge absorptive capacity on the knowledge-based enterprises performance by explaining the mediating role of innovation strategy and open innovation activities. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 7(4), 11-33. (In Persian) http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/smok.2024.1822 Shafiei Nikabadi, M., Moghaddam, A., Toorani, P., & Najar, A. A. (2024). The impact of knowledge management strategies on sustainable supply chain performance with an emphasis on eco-innovation (case study: personnel of small and medium enterprises in semnan province). Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 7(4), 91-115. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2024.1817 Shojaeifard, A., & Nadri Nezhad, T. (2024). Investigating the impact of knowledge management strategies on innovation capabilities with the mediating role of corporate social responsibility activities and information and communication technology in Hamrah Aval company. Journal of Behavioral Studies and Organizational Excellence, 1(2), 38-54. (In Persian) https://boe.apadana.ac.ir/showpaper/184388 Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American journal of Applied Mathematics and statistics, 9(1), 4-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.12691/ajams-9-1-2 Singh, S. K., & Del Giudice, M. (2019). Big data analytics, dynamic capabilities and firm performance. Management Decision, 57(8), 1729-1733. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2019-020 Sivarajah, U., Kumar, S., Kumar, V., Chatterjee, S., & Li, J. (2024). A study on big data analytics and innovation: From technological and business cycle perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 202, 123328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123328 Subrahmanyam, S., Aishwaryalaxmi, N. S., Khalife, D., Shaikh, I. A. K., Faldu, R., & Asthana, N. (2024, April). Impact of knowledge management and big data analytics capabilities on firm performance. In 2024 Ninth International Conference on Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (ICONSTEM) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONSTEM60960.2024.10568874 Taleb, T. S., Hashim, N., & Zakaria, N. (2023). Mediating effect of innovation capability between entrepreneurial resources and micro business performance. The Bottom Line, 36(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-07-2022-0112 Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS quarterly, 177-195. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284 Wongsansukcharoen, J., & Thaweepaiboonwong, J. (2023). Effect of innovations in human resource practices, innovation capabilities, and competitive advantage on small and medium enterprises’ performance in Thailand. European research on management and business economics, 29(1), 100210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2022.100210 World Intellectual Property Organization. (2025). Global innovation index 2025: executive version. Geneva: WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/gii-ranking/2025/ir.pdf Yusof, N. A., Kamal, E. M., Lou, E. C., & Kamaruddeen, A. M. (2023). Effects of innovation capability on radical and incremental innovations and business performance relationships. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 67, 101726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101726 Zareyan Moradabadi, B., Islambolchi, A., Hamidi, K., & Ghobadi Lemuk, T. (2024). Investigating the effect of intellectual capital on bank performance with the mediating role of innovation capability in state-owned banks of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Financial Economics,18 (67), 183-206. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.30495/ECJ.1403.1062480 Zhang, H., & Yuan, S. (2023). How and when does big data analytics capability boost innovation performance?. Sustainability, 15(5), 4036. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054036 Zhang, Z., Shang, Y., Cheng, L., & Hu, A. (2022). Big data capability and sustainable competitive advantage: the mediating role of ambidextrous innovation strategy. Sustainability, 14(14), 8249. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148249 Zhao, Y., Wen, S., Zhou, T., Liu, W., Yu, H., & Xu, H. (2022). Development and innovation of enterprise knowledge management strategies using big data neural networks technology. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100273 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 387 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 277 |
||