اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات38
تعداد شماره‌ها1,408
تعداد مقالات10,088
تعداد مشاهده مقاله11,909,121
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله6,961,242
پوراشرف, یاسان اله, محمدیاری, زهره. (1404). بررسی تاثیر هویت دانشی سازمان بر انعطاف پذیری استراتژیک:نقش میانجی هوشمندی دانشی و توانمندسازی دیجیتال دانش. پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری, 8(4), 134-154. doi: 10.47176/SMOK.2025.1947
یاسان اله پوراشرف; زهره محمدیاری. "بررسی تاثیر هویت دانشی سازمان بر انعطاف پذیری استراتژیک:نقش میانجی هوشمندی دانشی و توانمندسازی دیجیتال دانش". پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری, 8, 4, 1404, 134-154. doi: 10.47176/SMOK.2025.1947
پوراشرف, یاسان اله, محمدیاری, زهره. (1404). 'بررسی تاثیر هویت دانشی سازمان بر انعطاف پذیری استراتژیک:نقش میانجی هوشمندی دانشی و توانمندسازی دیجیتال دانش', پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری, 8(4), pp. 134-154. doi: 10.47176/SMOK.2025.1947
پوراشرف, یاسان اله, محمدیاری, زهره. بررسی تاثیر هویت دانشی سازمان بر انعطاف پذیری استراتژیک:نقش میانجی هوشمندی دانشی و توانمندسازی دیجیتال دانش. پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری, 1404; 8(4): 134-154. doi: 10.47176/SMOK.2025.1947

بررسی تاثیر هویت دانشی سازمان بر انعطاف پذیری استراتژیک:نقش میانجی هوشمندی دانشی و توانمندسازی دیجیتال دانش

مدیریت راهبردی دانش سازمانی
مقاله 6، دوره 8، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 31، دی 1404، صفحه 134-154    اصل مقاله (835.46 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی با اصالت
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.47176/SMOK.2025.1947
نویسندگان
یاسان اله پوراشرف1؛ زهره محمدیاری* 2
1استاد گروه مدیریت، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران
2استادیار کروه مدیریت، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران
چکیده
هدف: این پژوهش با هدف بررسی تأثیر هویت دانشی سازمان بر انعطاف‌پذیری استراتژیک در شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان استان ایلام انجام شده است. همچنین، نقش میانجی هوشمندی دانشی و توانمندسازی دیجیتال دانش در این رابطه مورد آزمون قرار گرفته است تا مکانیسم‌های واسطه‌ای تأثیرگذار شناسایی شوند.

روش پژوهش: این مطالعه از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر روش، توصیفی-همبستگی و از نوع پیمایشی با رویکرد کمی است. جامعه آماری شامل تمامی کارکنان شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان فعال در استان ایلام بوده و نمونه‌گیری به روش تصادفی ساده انجام شد. داده‌ها از طریق پرسشنامه استاندارد جمع‌آوری و با استفاده از روش تحلیل مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری در نرم‌افزار ویژوال پی ال اس تحلیل شدند. تعداد نهایی پاسخ‌دهندگان 200 نفر بود که از اعتبار و پایایی بالای ابزار اندازه‌گیری اطمینان حاصل شد.

یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که هویت دانشی سازمان به‌طور مثبت و معناداری بر هوشمندی دانشی (β = 0.896, t ˃ 1.96)، بر توانمندسازی دیجیتال دانش (β = 0.845, t ˃ 1.96) و بر انعطاف‌پذیری استراتژیک (β = 0.481, t ˃ 1.96) تأثیرگذار است. همچنین، هوشمندی دانشی (β = 0.859, t ˃ 1.96) و توانمندسازی دیجیتال دانش (β = 0.872, t ˃ 1.96) به‌طور معناداری بر انعطاف‌پذیری استراتژیک تأثیر می‌گذارند. آزمون نقش میانجی نشان داد که هر دو متغیر هوشمندی دانشی و توانمندسازی دیجیتال دانش به‌صورت مجزا و معنادار، نقش واسطه‌ای را در رابطه بین هویت دانشی سازمان و انعطاف‌پذیری استراتژیک ایفا می‌کنند .

نتایج: یافته‌ها حاکی از آن است که هویت دانشی سازمان نه تنها به‌طور مستقیم، بلکه از طریق ایجاد ظرفیت‌های هوشمند و دیجیتال در مدیریت دانش، به افزایش انعطاف‌پذیری استراتژیک منجر می‌شود. این امر بیانگر اهمیت تلفیق عوامل فرهنگی (هویت دانشی) و فناورانه (توانمندسازی دیجیتال) در سازمان‌های دانش‌محور است.

اصالت و ارزش: این پژوهش با ترکیب مفاهیم هویت دانشی، هوشمندی دانشی، توانمندسازی دیجیتال دانش و انعطاف‌پذیری استراتژیک در یک چارچوب نظری یکپارچه، به ادبیات مدیریت دانش و استراتژی سازمانی غنی‌تری می‌افزاید. همچنین، انجام این مطالعه در شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان یک استان محروم و کمتر توسعه‌یافته مانند ایلام، ارزش بالایی دارد، چرا که نشان می‌دهد حتی در شرایط محدودیت منابع، تمرکز بر سرمایه‌های نرم دانشی و دیجیتال می‌تواند به بهبود عملکرد استراتژیک منجر شود. این یافته‌ها راهکارهای عملی ارزشمندی برای مدیران شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان و سیاستگذاران منطقه‌ای در جهت بهبود عملکرد نهایی آنها ارائه می‌دهد.

تازه های تحقیق
  • هویت دانش سازمانی، محرک اصلی انعطاف‌پذیری استراتژیک است.
  • هوش دانش، واسطه ارتباط بین هویت دانش و انعطاف‌پذیری است.
  • توانمندسازی دانش دیجیتال، سازگاری استراتژیک را به طور قابل توجهی افزایش می‌دهد.
  • قابلیت‌های فرهنگی و دیجیتال به طور مشترک استراتژی‌های مبتنی بر دانش را تقویت می‌کنند.
  • شواهدی از شرکت‌های ایلام نشان می‌دهد که دارایی‌های نامشهود، انعطاف‌پذیری را در شرایط محدودیت افزایش می‌دهند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
هویت دانشی سازمانی؛ انعطاف پذیری استراتژیک؛ هوشمندی دانشی؛ توانمندسازی دیجیتال دانش
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Effect of Organizational Knowledge Identity on Strategic Flexibility: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Intelligence and Digital Knowledge Empowerment
نویسندگان [English]
Yasanollah Pourashraf1؛ Zohre Mohammadyari2
1Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Ilam, Ilam, Iran
2Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Ilam, Ilam, Iran
چکیده [English]
Purpose: Knowledge is the primary capital of every organization, and by managing it effectively, an organization ensures its survival and growth. Knowledge is the heartbeat of every decision made in an organization. Product development, service improvement, customer interaction, and overall organizational operations cannot function without such knowledge.  Organizational knowledge identity refers to the beliefs, values, tacit and explicit knowledge, learning culture, and behavioral patterns that define how an organization manages, shares, and utilizes knowledge. This identity encompasses what the organization knows about knowledge, how it creates, stores, and transfers knowledge, and how it applies knowledge in decision-making and daily operations. Organizational knowledge identity reflects a company’s cultural and strategic distinctiveness and serves as a foundation for developing cognitive capabilities and organizational innovation. In today’s digital and globalized era, characterized by rapid change, intense competition, and increasing environmental complexity, having a clear and strong knowledge identity has become essential for organizational survival. Knowledge-based organizations, as key drivers of innovation and scientific-economic development in a country, require intelligent knowledge management and utilization of digital capabilities. Organizational knowledge identity, as a measure of how an organization engages with knowledge, creates the necessary foundation for enhanced performance in the field of knowledge intelligence. Simultaneously, digital knowledge empowerment plays a critical role in facilitating rapid and up-to-date access to the knowledge required for strategic decision-making. However, a comprehensive understanding of how these concepts interact to enhance strategic flexibility, particularly within local contexts such as knowledge-based companies in Ilam Province, remains limited. This gap in the literature highlights the need for localized, empirically grounded research. This study, which focuses on knowledge-based companies in Ilam Province, examines the relationship between organizational knowledge identity and strategic flexibility while considering the mediating roles of knowledge intelligence and digital knowledge empowerment. This research not only deepens the theoretical understanding of these interrelated concepts but also provides practical insights for managers of knowledge-based firms seeking to strengthen knowledge- and technology-driven strategies. Therefore, the main research question is as follows: What is the impact of organizational knowledge identity on strategic flexibility, considering the mediating roles of knowledge intelligence and digital knowledge empowerment in knowledge-based companies in Ilam Province?
Research Method: This study is a quantitative research that is applied in nature, as its findings can be utilized in decision-making processes by managers of knowledge-based companies in the province of Ilam. In terms of design and methodology, this analytical-correlational study examines the relationships among the variables using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The statistical population includes all employees of knowledge-based companies in Ilam Province who are involved in knowledge-driven and innovative activities. These individuals play key roles in knowledge management, strategic decision-making, and the utilization of digital technologies. The sample size consisted of 200 participants selected from these companies through simple random sampling. The sample members were senior managers, middle managers, knowledge specialists, and information technology experts. Data were collected using a standardized questionnaire. The questionnaire content was designed based on a five-point Likert scale ranging from "Strongly Agree" to "Strongly Disagree." To measure the organizational knowledge identity variable, we used the standardized scale developed by Gupta and Govindarajan (2021). For strategic flexibility, a standardized questionnaire by Jiang and Cheng (2021) was employed. The organizational knowledge intelligence variable was assessed using the validated scale developed by Ranjan et al. (2023), and the digital knowledge empowerment variable was measured using the standardized instrument developed by Tiss (2018). The content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed through expert reviews by faculty members and specialists in the fields of knowledge and strategic management. Additionally, the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) values were used to assess construct validity. Since the AVE values for all the research variables exceeded the recommended threshold of 0.50, convergent validity was established. The reliability of the measurement instrument was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and composite reliability. The obtained values for both Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability were above 0.70, indicating acceptable internal consistency and reliability of the scale. For data analysis, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was conducted using Visual PLS software.
Findings: The results indicate that organizational knowledge identity has a significant positive effect on knowledge intelligence (β = 0.896, t > 1.96), digital knowledge empowerment (β = 0.845, t > 1.96), and strategic flexibility (β = 0.481, t > 1.96). Furthermore, both knowledge intelligence (β = 0.859, t > 1.96) and digital knowledge empowerment (β = 0.872, t > 1.96) significantly and positively influenced strategic flexibility. The mediation analysis reveals that both knowledge intelligence and digital knowledge empowerment significantly mediate the relationship between organizational knowledge identity and strategic flexibility, independently and completely.
Results: The findings indicate that organizational knowledge identity enhances strategic flexibility directly and indirectly by fostering intelligent and digital capabilities in knowledge management. This highlights the importance of integrating cultural factors (i.e., knowledge identity) with technological enablers (i.e., digital empowerment) in knowledge-oriented organizations. Overall, this study proposes a comprehensive theoretical framework that demonstrates that organizational knowledge identity, as the most fundamental form of intangible capital, can effectively drive strategic flexibility through the enhancement of knowledge intelligence and digital knowledge empowerment. These findings enrich the theoretical literature on knowledge and strategy and offer valuable practical implications for organizations seeking sustainability and competitiveness in dynamic and uncertain environments.
Originality and Value: This study contributes to the literature on knowledge management and organizational strategy by integrating the concepts of organizational knowledge identity, knowledge intelligence, digital knowledge empowerment, and strategic flexibility into a unified theoretical framework. Moreover, conducting this research in knowledge-based firms located in an underdeveloped and resource-constrained province such as Ilam adds significant value, demonstrating that even under limited resources, focusing on intangible knowledge and digital assets can enhance the strategic performance. These findings offer practical and valuable implications for managers of knowledge-based companies and regional policymakers aiming to improve organizational effectiveness.The findings of this study offer valuable practical implications for managers and leaders of knowledge-based companies particularly those operating in underprivileged or less-developed regions such as Ilam Province. Given the limitations of financial resources, technological infrastructure, and access to specialized human capital in such areas, focusing on intangible organizational assets such as knowledge identity, knowledge intelligence, and digital knowledge empowerment can serve as a low-cost yet highly effective strategy to enhance strategic flexibility and, consequently, organizational survival and competitiveness.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Organizational Knowledge Identity, Strategic Flexibility, Knowledge Intelligence, Digital Knowledge Empowerment
مراجع

Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250981

Alavi, S., & Salehi, M. (2021). The impact of knowledge identity on innovation performance: The mediating role of knowledge management processes. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems , 51(3), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1108/VINEJ-02-2021-0023

Ali, I., Morteza, N., & Ramin., T. (2021). Knowledge Identity (KI): A New Approach to Integrating Knowledge Management into Enterprise Systems, Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2021.055

Ansari, F. (2020). Cost-based text understanding to improve maintenance knowledge intelligence in manufacturing enterprises, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 141, 234-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106319.

Aryani, O., Yazdani, H.R., & Ramezan, M. (2025). Identifying and explaining the mechanism of tacit knowledge sharing among University of Tehran employees in the development of successors. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 8 (2), 105-133. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2025.1881(In Persian)

Awais, M., Ali, A., Khattak, M. S., Arfeen, M. I., Chaudhary, M. A. I., & Syed, A. (2023). Strategic Flexibility and Organizational Performance: Mediating Role of Innovation. SAGE Open, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231181432 (Original work published 2023)

Bazrkar, A., & Hajimohammadi, M. (2021). The investigation of the mediating role of innovation and organizational intelligence on the relationship between knowledge management and financial performance of the organizations active in the e-banking industry, Independent Journal of Management & Production, 12(1), 188-203. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v12i1.1267

Campos, D.G., Scherer, R. Digital gender gaps in Students’ knowledge, attitudes and skills: an integrative data analysis across 32 Countries. Educ Inf Technol 29, 655–693 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12272-9

 Chen, C., & Huang, R. (2020). Knowledge identity and its impact on innovation capability in SMEs. Journal of Industrial and Commodity Economics , 47(3), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-03-2020-0052

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.

Chowdhury Jony Moin, Mohammad Iqbal, A.B.M. Abdul Malek, Mohammad Muhshin Aziz Khan, Rezwanul Haque; Unleashing the power of manufacturing flexibility: enhancing performance in Bangladesh's ready-made garment industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 18 April 2024; 35 (3): 434–457. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2023-0119

Colombelli, A., Paolucci, E., Raguseo, E. Elia, G. (2024). The creation of digital innovative start-ups: the role of digital knowledge spillovers and digital skill endowment. Small Bus Econ 62, 917–937 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00789-9

Daňa, J., Caputo, F. & Ráček, J. Complex Network Analysis for Knowledge Management and Organizational Intelligence. J Knowl Econ 11, 405–424 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-018-0553-x

Danilo Brozović, Christian Jansson, Börje Boers; Strategic flexibility and growth of small and medium-sized enterprises: a study of enablers and barriers. Management Decision 6 June 2025; 63 (6): 1914–1935. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2022-0577

Dimitrios Kafetzopoulos, Anastasia A. Katou; Expanding strategic flexibility through organizational culture, industry 4.0 and market orientation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 28 May 2024; 73 (5): 1305–1325. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2023-0010

Femi, Olan., Emmanuel, Ogiemwonyi.,Arakpogun, Jana Suklan., Franklin, Nakpodia., Nadja, Damij., Uchitha, Jayawickrama. (2023). Artificial intelligence and knowledge sharing: Contributing factors to organizational performance, Journal of Business Research, 145, 605-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.008

Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2021). Knowledge identity and digital transformation: An empirical study in healthcare organizations. Journal of Data, Information and Management , 3(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JDIT-05-2021-0062

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878898

Hao Jiao, Jifeng Yang, Yu Cui; Institutional pressure and open innovation: the moderating effect of digital knowledge and experience-based knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management 2 November 2022; 26 (10): 2499–2527. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2021-0046

Jiang, R., & Chen, L. (2021). Strategic flexibility in knowledge-intensive firms: A digital transformation perspective. Journal of Knowledge-Based Innovation in China , 13(4), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKIC-02-2021-0025

Jianmin, S., Shouxun, W., Qingzhong, R., Lu, Z(2022).  The choice and acquisition of external knowledge in startups: matching improvisation to strategic flexibility. Management Decision 10 November 2022; 60 (11): 2928–2951. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2021-0467

Jitrinee, C., Nongnapat, T. (2023). Strategic flexibility: a systematic review and future research directions. Journal of Strategy and Management 1 August 2023; 16 (3): 470–491. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-08-2022-0134

Juan Gabriel Martínez-Navalón, Vera Gelashvili, Nelson DeMatos, Giovanni Herrera-Enríquez; Exploring the impact of digital knowledge management on technostress and sustainability. Journal of Knowledge Management 19 October 2023; 27 (8): 2194–2216. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2022-0544

Kim, H., Lee, J., & Oh, S. E. (2019). Individual characteristics influencing the sharing of knowledge on social networking services: online identity, self-efficacy, and knowledge sharing intentions. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(4), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1598494

Kim, S., & Park, J. (2019). How does organizational knowledge identity influence strategic agility? Evidence from technology-based firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 144, 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.012

Kui Yin, Can Li, Oliver J. Sheldon, Jing Zhao; CEO transformational leadership and firm innovation: the role of strategic flexibility and top management team knowledge diversity. Chinese Management Studies 13 November 2023; 17 (5): 933–953. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-10-2021-0440

Lara Agostini, Anna Nosella, Riikka Sarala, Corinne Nkeng; Emerging trends around strategic flexibility: a systematic review supported by bibliometric techniques. Management Decision 6 June 2025; 63 (6): 1835–1881. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2023-0135

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Leonardi, P. M., & Neeley, T. B. (2016). The implications of electronic media use for organizational hierarchy, authority, and knowledge in global teams. Organization Science, 27(3), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1058

Marko Juhani Matalamäki, Sanna Joensuu-Salo; Digitalization and strategic flexibility – a recipe for business growth. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 24 May 2022; 29 (3): 380–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-10-2020-0384

Medina-García, M., Higueras-Rodríguez, L., García-Vita, M. d. M., & Doña-Toledo, L. (2021). ICT, Disability, and Motivation: Validation of a Measurement Scale and Consequence Model for Inclusive Digital Knowledge. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 6770. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136770

Mikalef, P., Pateli, A., Wetering, R. V., & John, A. (2019). Business intelligence use and organizational agility: The moderating effect of competitive intensity. Information & Management, 56(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.06.001

Mohammad, I., Jeetesh, K., Tariqul, I., Marco, V.(2024). The interplay among paradoxical leadership, industry 4.0 technologies, organisational ambidexterity, strategic flexibility and corporate sustainable performance in manufacturing SMEs of Malaysia. European Business Review 19 July 2024; 36 (5): 639–669. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-04-2023-0109

Nguyen, V.M., Bell, C., Berseth, V. Cvitanovic, C., Darwent, R., Falconer, M., Hutchen, J., Kapoor, T., Klenk, N., & Young, N.(2021). Promises and pitfalls of digital knowledge exchange resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Socio Ecol Pract Res 3, 427–439 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-021-00097-0.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (2019). Knowledge identity and knowledge sharing behavior: A social capital perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management , 23(6), 1123–1140. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2019-0054

Omat Mohammadi, S.V., Hajianvari, L., & Mohaqeq, K. (2025). Developing a Model for Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Change the Organization’s Public Relations Unit’s Processes, With an Emphasis on Organizational Knowledge Management. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 8 (1), 33-51. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2025.1856 (In Persian)

Pethmi De Silva, Nuwan Gunarathne, Satish Kumar; Exploring the impact of digital knowledge, integration and performance on sustainable accounting, reporting and assurance. Meditari Accountancy Research 25 March 2025; 33 (2): 497–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2024-2383 

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147

Ranjan Chaudhuri, Sheshadri Chatterjee, Prof. Demetris Vrontis, Francesca Vicentini; Effects of human capital on entrepreneurial ecosystems in the emerging economy: the mediating role of digital knowledge and innovative capability from India perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital 15 March 2023; 24 (1): 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-07-2021-0177

Rashmi Yogesh Pai, Ankitha Shetty, Adithya D. Shetty, Rakshith Bhandary, Jyothi Shetty, Santosh Nayak, Tantri Keerthi Dinesh & Komal Jenifer D'souza (2022) Integrating artificial intelligence for knowledge management systems – synergy among people and technology: a systematic review of the evidence, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35:1, 7043-7065, DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2058976

Rosowulan, T., Hasyim, A. F., Sholikhun, M., Purwanto, P., Djamil, A., In’amuzahiddin, M., & Wijaya, R. (2025). PESANTREN’S KNOWLEDGE IDENTITY CRISIS IN THE DIGITAL ERA. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 13(1), 49-76. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i1.1287

Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036530

Shehla Malik; Emotional intelligence and innovative work behaviour in knowledge-intensive organizations: how tacit knowledge sharing acts as a mediator?. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems 24 October 2022; 52 (5): 650–669.  https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2020-0158

Shivam Gupta, Tuure Tuunanen, Arpan Kumar Kar, Sachin Modgil; Managing digital knowledge for ensuring business efficiency and continuity. Journal of Knowledge Management 1 February 2023; 27 (2): 245–263.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2021-0703

Smith, J., & Brown, T. (2023). The role of knowledge identity in building organizational resilience during crisis. International Journal of Information Management , 71, 102654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102654

Teece, D. J. (2018). Managing digital knowledge ecosystems for innovation and dynamic capability development . California Management Review, 60(2), 79–98.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617749399 .

Teece, D. J. (2021). Knowledge identity as a strategic asset for dynamic capabilities development. Organization Studies , 42(2), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620955117

Tønnessen, Q., Dhir, A., & Flåten, B. (2021). Digital knowledge sharing and creative performance: Work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 806-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore. 2021.120866.

Wang, C. L., & Rong, G. (2020). Knowledge identity and organizational learning: The mediating role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Knowledge Management , 24(5), 1010–1025. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2019-0357

Warner, K. S. R., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349. 10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001

Wijnhoven, F., & Bont, C. J. A. M. (2019). Strategic knowledge management and organizational identity: Toward a unified framework. Journal of Knowledge Management , 23(4), 789–807. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2018-0505

Zahedi, A.E. (2025). Integrating Knowledge Management And Artificial Intelligence To Improve Human Resource Performance (Case Study: Government Offices Of Markazi Province). Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 8 (2), 36-61. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2025.1913

Zhang, Y., & Li, H. (2022). Digital transformation and knowledge identity in knowledge-intensive firms. Knowledge-Based Systems , 249, 108652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108652

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 187
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 143