| تعداد نشریات | 38 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,419 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,204 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,185,423 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,128,906 |
فرصتها و چالشهای سیاستگذاری حکمرانی داده در معاونت علمی، فناوری و اقتصاد دانشبنیان ریاستجمهوری | ||
| مدیریت راهبردی دانش سازمانی | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 28 تیر 1405 اصل مقاله (1.7 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی با اصالت | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.47176/SMOK.2026.2028 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| زهرا فقیهی1؛ نسترن پورصالحی2؛ علیرضا نوروزی* 2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت اطلاعات، گروه علم اطلاعات و مدیریت دانش، دانشکده مدیریت دولتی و علوم سازمانی، دانشکدگان مدیریت، | ||
| 2گروه علم اطلاعات و مدیریت دانش، دانشکده مدیریت دولتی و علوم سازمانی، دانشکدگان مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 0-747 فروردین 786، تاریخ بازنگری: 0-723 فروردین 786، تاریخ پذیرش: 0-708 فروردین 786 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: این پژوهش، فرصتها و چالشهای سیاستگذاری حاکمیت داده را در معاونت علمی، فناوری و اقتصاد دانشبنیان ریاست جمهوری ایران شناسایی و اولویتبندی میکند. روششناسی: ابتدا مؤلفههای حاکمیت داده از طریق بررسی متون شناسایی شدند و پرسشنامهای که توسط محقق تهیه شده بود، بین مدیران، متخصصان داده و کارکنان فناوری اطلاعات در مرکز همکاریهای تحول و پیشرفت توزیع شد. دادهها با استفاده از آزمونهای فریدمن، اسپیرمن، من-ویتنی و کروسکال-والیس در نرمافزار SPSS تجزیه و تحلیل شدند. یافتهها: ده مؤلفه سیاستگذاری حاکمیت داده بر اساس چارچوب انجمن مدیریت داده شناسایی شدند. مدلسازی و طراحی داده به عنوان بزرگترین فرصت و مهمترین چالش شناسایی شد. هفت مؤلفه وضعیت فرصت مطلوبی را نشان دادند، در حالی که سه مؤلفه نسبتاً مطلوب بودند. در مورد چالشها، هفت مؤلفه نامطلوب و دو مؤلفه نسبتاً مطلوب بودند. همبستگیهای معناداری بین همه مؤلفهها یافت شد، در حالی که متغیرهای جمعیتشناختی هیچ تأثیر معناداری نداشتند. بحث: مدلسازی و طراحی داده به دلیل نقش دوگانه خود، به بالاترین اولویت سیاستگذاری نیاز دارد. مؤلفههایی که فرصتهای مطلوبی دارند باید تقویت شوند، در حالی که مؤلفههایی که در شرایط نسبتاً مطلوبی هستند باید قبل از پرداختن به نقاط ضعف بحرانیتر بهبود یابند. روابط قوی بین مؤلفهها، نیاز به سیاستگذاری هماهنگ را برجسته میکند. نتیجهگیری: شناسایی فرصتها و چالشهای سیاستگذاری حاکمیت داده، نقشه راهی برای مؤسسات دولتی فراهم میکند. یک مدل سیاستگذاری یکپارچه که همزمان فرصتها را تقویت، چالشها را کاهش و تعاملات بین همه مؤلفهها را در نظر میگیرد، میتواند عملکرد سازمانی را بهبود و از حاکمیت داده مؤثرتر پشتیبانی کند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| حکمرانی داده؛ سیاستگذاری حکمرانی داده؛ فرصتهای سیاستگذاری حکمرانی داده؛ چالشهای سیاستگذاری حکمرانی داده؛ معاونت علمی؛ فناوری و اقتصاد دانشبنیان ریاستجمهوری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Opportunities and Challenges of Data Governance Policy-Making in the Vice Presidency for Science, Technology and Knowledge-Based Economy | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Zahra Faghihi1؛ Nastaran Poursalehi2؛ Alireza Noruzi2 | ||
| 1Department of Information Science and Knowledge Management, Faculty of Public Administration and Organizational Science, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Information Science and Knowledge Management, Faculty of Public Administration and Organizational Science, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Purpose: This study identifies and prioritizes the opportunities and challenges of data governance policymaking within the Iranian Vice Presidency for Science, Technology, and Knowledge-Based Economy. Methodology: A quantitative survey was conducted. Data governance components were identified through a literature review, and a researcher-developed questionnaire was distributed among managers, data specialists, and information technology staff at the Center for Transformation and Progress Cooperation. Data were analyzed using the Friedman, Spearman, Mann–Whitney, and Kruskal–Wallis tests in SPSS. Results: Ten data governance policymaking components were identified based on the Data Management Association (DAMA) framework. Data modeling and design was identified as both the greatest opportunity and the most significant challenge. Seven components showed favorable opportunity status, whereas three were relatively favorable. For challenges, seven components were unfavorable and two were relatively favorable. Significant correlations were found among all components, while demographic variables had no significant effects. Discussion: The findings indicate that data modeling and design requires the highest policy priority because of its dual role. Components with favorable opportunities should be reinforced, whereas those in relatively favorable condition should be improved before addressing more critical weaknesses. The strong relationships among components highlight the need for coordinated policymaking. Conclusion: Identifying the opportunities and challenges of data governance policymaking provides a roadmap for governmental institutions. An integrated policy model that simultaneously strengthens opportunities, mitigates challenges, and considers interactions among all components can improve organizational performance and support more effective data governance. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| data governance, data governance policy‑making, policy‑making, opportunities and challenges of data governance policy‑making, Vice Presidency for Science, Technology and Knowledge‑Based Economy | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abraham, R., Schneider, J., & Vom Brocke, J. (2019). Data governance: A conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.008 Acev, D., Biyani, S., Rieder, F., Aldenhoff, T. T., Blazevic, M., Riehle, D. M., & Wimmer, M. A. (2025). Systematic analysis of data governance frameworks and their relevance to data trusts. Management Review Quarterly, 1-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-025-00545-1 Aghasy, M., Entezari, M. H., & Mohammadi Monfared, H. (2025). Issues and challenges of national data governance in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Proceedings of the First National Conference on Data Governance and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran. (in Persian) Alsaad, A. (2023). Governmental data governance frameworks: A systematic literature review. Proceedings - 2023 International Conference on Computing, Electronics and Communications Engineering, iCCECE 2023, pp. 150-156. https://doi.org/10.1109/iCCECE59400.2023.10238504 Amini, M. (2018). Data governance: Concepts and applications. Data Governance Workshop Series in Industries. (in Persian) Atlan. (2024). Active data governance. https://atlan.com/active-data-governance/ Azizi Mehmandoost, M., Mahdinegad Noori, M., & Aaghaee, M. (2024). Strategies and requirements for achieving effective, sustainable and sustainable transformation of senior data governance. Journal of Exalted Governance, 3(11), 75–106. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.28212614.1402.3.3.4.0 (in Persian) Cheong, L. K., and Chang, V., (2007). The need for data governance: A case study (2007). ACIS 2007 Proceedings - 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 999 - 1008. https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2007/100 Chen, B., Liu, Y., & Bai, K. (2022). Topic distribution of China's data governance policies: A full-text highlighted clue word approach. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3210, pp. 56 - 63. Finizadeh Bidgoli, M., Mozafari, A., & Khojasteh Bagherzadeh, H. (2025). Examining the status and outcomes of data governance formation in Iran. Proceedings of the First National Conference on Data Governance and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran. Finizadeh Bidgoli, M., Mozaffari, A., Khojasteh Bagherzadeh, H., & Farhangi, A. A. (2024). Examining the status and implementation strategies of data governance in organizations (Case Study: Islamic Azad University). Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 40(2), 439-464. https://doi.org/10.22034/jipm.2024.714553 (in Persian) Gao, J. (2015). Performance measurement and management in the public sector: some lessons from research evidence. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1704 Ghaffari, H., Kord, B., Yaghoubi, N.M., & Keshtegar, A. (2023). Typology of the mentality of experts of government organizations in the field of establishing big data governance using Q methodology. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 38(2), 181-208. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2022.033 (in Persian) Ghaffari, H., Kord, B., Yaghoubi, N. M., & Keshtegar, A. A. (2021). Identifying the factors and outcomes of establishing big data governance in governmental organizations using a mixed methodology. Journal of Public Administration, 13(4), 684-705. https://doi.org/10.22059/jipa.2021.331504.3037 (in Persian) Ghafari, M., Azar, A., & Shabbak, A. (2017). Causal mapping in managing statistical outputs with data quality approach. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 33(3), 453-486. (in Persian) Hendrawan, F.R., Kusumasari, T.F., Fauzi, R. (2022). Analysis of design implementation guidelines for data governance management based on DAMA-DMBOKv2. 2022 7th International Conference on Informatics and Computing, ICIC 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIC56845.2022.10007021 International, D. (2017). DAMA-DMBOK: Data management body of knowledge (2nd Edition). Technics Publications, LLC. Janssen, M., Brous, P., Estevez, E., Barbosa, L.S., Janowski, T. (2020). Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy artificial intelligence. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), Article No. 101493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101493 Khaledi, A., Karimmian, Z., & Mohammadi, M. (2023). A framework for analyzing data governance at the national level using meta-synthesis. Public Management Researches, 16(59), 167-192. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2022.39701.5581 (in Persian) Mortazavi, M.R., Moeini, A. & Sajedinejad, A. (2024). data governance framework in data exchange centers. Sciences and Techniques of Information Management, 10(1), 89-116. https://doi.org/10.22091/STIM.2022.7668.1700 (in Persian) Nikbakht, M., & Mojtahed, V. (2025). Prioritization of data governance frameworks using a fuzzy MCDM approach: A case study. ICADEIS 2025 - 2025 International Conference on Advancement in Data Science, E-learning and Information System: Integrating Data Science and Information System, Proceeding. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICADEIS65852.2025.10933050 Paramita, A.S., Prabowo H., Ramadhan A., Sensuse D.I. (2023). Data governance model for nation-wide non-profit organization. Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science, 5(1), 170 - 183. https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v5i1.2415 Pourajam, P., & Mohammadi, Z. (2025). Analysis and review of data governance frameworks: Approaches and operational models. Proceedings of the First National Conference on Data Governance and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran. (in Persian) Prasetyo, H.N., Surendro, K. (2015). Designing a data governance model based on soft system methodology (SSM) in organization. J Theor Appl Inf Technol, 78, 1. Ruslan I.F., Alby M.F., Lubis M. (2022). Applying data governance using DAMA-DMBOK 2 framework: The case for human capital management operations. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 336-342. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568834.3568866 Saadatmand, A. (2021). Concepts of data governance and a review of the DMBOK2 framework. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Technology Engineering, Computer, and Telecommunications of Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/1259794 (in Persian) Sahraei, F. (2023). Analyzing the comprehensive electronic government document of the Islamic Republic of Iran from the perspective of digital government and data governance indicators. State Studies, 9(34), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.22054/TSSQ.2023.74022.1419 (in Persian) Sarzani, H., Malekinia, M., & Mortazavi Shahroudi, S. (2024). Effectiveness of designing a data governance maturity model in governmental organizations. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Management, Accounting, Economics, and Banking. (in Persian) Shah, S. I. H., Peristeras, V., & Magnisalis, I. (2024). A conceptual framework for the government big data ecosystem (datagov.eco). Data & Knowledge Engineering, 154, 102348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2024.102348 Sharma, A.K., Sharma, R. (2025). Data governance in the age of artificial intelligence: Challenges, best practices and regulatory compliance. Applied Marketing Analytics, 10(4), 390-403. https://doi.org/10.69554/XWHM1191 Smith, A. M. (2025). data-governance-frameworks. Dataversity. https://www.dataversity.net/articles/data-governance-frameworks/ Twilio Segment. (2014). https://segment.com/data-hub/data-governance/policy/ The data governance institute. (2023). Home. https://datagovernance.com/ Tavakkoli, G.R., Mohammad Zahiri, M., & Mazaheri Tari, M. (2022). Modeling the challenges of establishing a data-driven organizational culture in Iranian government organizations (Case study: organizations under the Ministry of Defense). Scientific Journal of Organizational Knowledge Management, 4(15), 111-149. Vice Presidency for Science, Technology and Knowledge Base Economy. (2024). https://isti.ir (in Persian) Vice Presidency for Science, Technology and Knowledge Base Economy (2023). https://isti.ir & https://isti.ir/History (in Persian) Winks, D (2025). Data governance basics: Everything you need to know in data governance. https://atlan.com/data-governance-basics/ Zhu, H., Chen, X., Li, S., Wang, Y., Fang, X., Zhu, M. (2023). Data governance: Status, technologies, applications and development trends. Proceedings - 2023 8th International Conference on Data Science in Cyberspace, DSC 2023, 143 - 150. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSC59305.2023.00030 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 19 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 11 |
||