News

 Statistics

Number of Journals34
Number of Issues1,306
Number of Articles9,427
Article View9,188,291
PDF Download5,620,733
(2018). Risk Assessment in Road Construction Projects Based on the PMBOK Standard Case study: (Cable Bridge Construction Project the City of Sari). Electronic and Cyber Defense, 9(3), 55-66.
. "Risk Assessment in Road Construction Projects Based on the PMBOK Standard Case study: (Cable Bridge Construction Project the City of Sari)". Electronic and Cyber Defense, 9, 3, 2018, 55-66.
(2018). 'Risk Assessment in Road Construction Projects Based on the PMBOK Standard Case study: (Cable Bridge Construction Project the City of Sari)', Electronic and Cyber Defense, 9(3), pp. 55-66.
Risk Assessment in Road Construction Projects Based on the PMBOK Standard Case study: (Cable Bridge Construction Project the City of Sari). Electronic and Cyber Defense, 2018; 9(3): 55-66.

Risk Assessment in Road Construction Projects Based on the PMBOK Standard Case study: (Cable Bridge Construction Project the City of Sari)

پدافند غیرعامل
Article 6, Volume 9, Issue 3, December 2020, Pages 55-66    PDF (1.06 M)
Document Type: Original Article
Receive Date: 11 September 2017,  Revise Date: 06 March 2019,  Accept Date: 19 September 2018 
Abstract
Large construction projects undoubtedly will be accompanied by many risks. Risks are often ignored in project implementation or allocated to sectors that do not have the knowledge, resources, and capacities to manage risks effectively, and this will lead to additional costs, reduction of the performance, and eventually delays in the project. Risk identification and allocation are the two key factors in risk management decisions. Due to the impact of risk factors, the probability of the risk and Chance of risk detection, each one of the risks can be affected by other risk factors. The purpose of this study is to rank the risk of road construction projects based on the PMBOK standard and determine the most risky areas of this standard. The use of this approach has been studied in a real project and Delphi method has been used to gather information about the conditions of the project. To rank this information, the network analysis process was used, after the implementation of the network model produced in Super Decision software, cost management and time management were identified as the most risky areas of the PMBOK standard.
Keywords
Risk Management; Project Management Body Of Knowledge; Network Analysis Process
References
  1. Sabzeparvar, “Project Control,” 18th ed. Termeh, 2014. (In Persian)##
  2. “A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide),” 5th ed. Newtown Square, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute Inc. (PMI), 2012.##
  3. K. D. Prasanta, “Managing project risk using combined analytic hierarchy process and risk map,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 10, pp. 990-1000, 2010.##
  4. T. Williams, “A Classified Bibliography of Recent Research Relating to Project Risk Management,” European Journal of Operation Research, vol. 85, pp. 18-38, 1995.##
  5. l. Olfat, F. Khosravani, and R. Jalali, “Identifying and Prioritizing Project Risk Based on PMBOK Standard with Fuzzy Approach,” Journal of Industrial Management Studies, vol. 8, pp. 147-163, 2010. (In Persian)##
  6. J. M. Parchami, E. Taghizadeh, and B. Saghi, “Investigation of Contract Allocations of Risks in General Conditions of the Contract (Three-Factor Contracts),” Fine Arts magazine, vol. 46, pp. 39-50. 2012. (In Persian)##
  7. A. Rezaeifard, M. S. Jabal Ameli, and A. Chaei, “Ranking project risks using multi-criteria decision-making models,” 2th International Conference on Project Management and Control, 2006. (In Persian)
  8. B. Dari and E. Hamzeie, “Identify the risk response strategy in risk management to the ANP technique,” Industrial Management Magazine, vol 4, pp. 75-92, 2010. (In Persian)##
  9. A. Gulgun and T. Gonca, “Risk assessment and management for supply chain networks,” Computers in Industry, vol. 61, pp. 250-259, 2010.##
  10. Y. Sun, R. Huang, D. Chen, and H. Li, “Fuzzy Set Based Risk Evaluation Model for Real Estate Projects,” Tsinghua Sciene and Technology, vol. 13, pp. 158-164, 2008.##
  11. A. Nieto-Morote and F. Ruz-Vila, “A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 220-231, 2010.##
  12. S. Maleki and R. Sarvestan, “Safety Assessment of Ilam and Providing Defensive Strategies from the Perspective of Civil Defense,” Passive Defense Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 3, pp.  47-56, 2016. (In Persian)##
  13. W. Wei-Wen and L. Yu-Ting, “Selecting knowledge management strategies by using the analytic network process,” vol. 32, Issue 3, pp. 841-847, 2007.##
  14. R. W. Saaty, “The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making and the analytic network process (ANP) for decision making with dependence and feedback,” Creative Decisions Foundation, 2003.##
  15. T. L. Saaty, “The Analytic Hierarchy Process,” McGraw Hill, New York, 1980.##
  16. T. L. Saaty, “The analytic network process decision making whit dependence and feedback,” PA: RWS Publication, 1996.##
  17. E. Kinositia, “From AHP to ANP,” Operations Research on Japan, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 677-683, 2003.##
  18. C. Shu-Hsing, A. H. I. Lee, and W. L. Pearn, “Analytic network process approach for mix planning in semiconductor fabricator,” Int. J. Production Economics, vol. 96, pp. 15-36, 2005.##

 L. M. Meade and J. Sarkis, “Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: An analytical network approach,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 241-261, 1999.##

  1. T. L. Saaty, “Decision Making whit dependence and feedback: the analytic network process,” Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications, 2001.##
  2. G. Dehdasht, R. Mohamad Zin, and S. Ferwati,  “DEMATEL-ANP Risk Assessment in Oil and Gas Construction Projects.,” Sustainability, vol. 9, pp. 14-28, 2017.##
Statistics
Article View: 4,096
PDF Download: 2,234