آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 36 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,192 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,579 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 6,988,703 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,032,545 |
تحلیل نقش آمریکا در رقابت تسلیحاتی کشورهای غرب آسیا (2000 تا 2020) | ||
| مطالعات راهبردی آمریکا | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 2، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 7، بهمن 1401، صفحه 11-47 اصل مقاله (1.41 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.27834743/ASS.2206.1101 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محسن اسلامی* 1؛ محمد کرمپوری2 | ||
| 1نویسنده مسئول: دانشیار، گروه روابط بین‌الملل، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه فردوسی، مشهد، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 15 خرداد 1401، تاریخ بازنگری: 07 شهریور 1401، تاریخ پذیرش: 12 شهریور 1401 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| فرآیند رقابت تسلیحاتی در میان کشورهای منطقه غرب آسیا در دو دهه اخیر شدت بیشتری یافته است، تا آنجا که بخش اعظم درآمدهای اقتصادی کشورهای این منطقه، صرف هزینه‌های دفاعی و خریدهای تسلیحاتی شده است؛ اما در این رقابت، آمریکا نقش بارز و مهم‌تری نسبت به دیگر قدرت‌های جهانی در این منطقه ایفا کرده است. سؤالی مهمی که در ارتباط با این فرآیند مطرح می‌شود این است که علت نقش برجسته آمریکا در افزایش رقابت تسلیحاتی کشورهای غرب آسیا چه بوده است؟ نتایج نشان می‌دهد که آمریکا به‌عنوان یک قدرت سرکرده و هژمون، تجارت اسلحه در غرب آسیا را در اهداف داخلی، منطقه‌ای و جهانی تعریف کرده است و علل بروز نقش برجسته آمریکا می‌تواند در سطح داخلی ناشی از رونق بخشیدن به اقتصاد و صنعت تسلیحاتی و در سطح منطقه‌ای ناشی از افزایش قدرت بازدارندگی کشورهای غرب آسیا که متحد آمریکا در برابر ایران هستند، توجیه حضور خود در غرب آسیا برای کسب هژمون منطقه‌ای، شکل دادن به نظم موردنظر خود برای تسلط بر منطقه و مبارزه با تروریسم را شامل می‌شود و در سطح بین‌المللی حفظ و ارتقای هژمونی خود در رقابت با قدرت‌های بزرگ است. چارچوب نظری مقاله حاضر، بر مبنای نظریه نوواقع‌گرایی و مفاهیم اقتصاد دفاعی طراحی شده است و با استفاده از روش کتابخانه‌ای، داده‌ها را جمع‌آوری نموده و با رویکرد توصیفی- تحلیلی به تحلیل آن‌ها پرداخته است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| آمریکا؛ غرب آسیا؛ رقابت تسلیحاتی؛ ایران؛ واقع‌گرایی تهاجمی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analysis of America's Role in the Arms Race of West Asian Countries (2000 to 2020) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohsen Eslami1؛ mohammad karampouriy2 | ||
| 1Corresponding author: Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2PhD student in political science, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The process of arms competition among the countries of the West Asian region has intensified in the last two decades to the extent that most of the economic incomes of the countries of this region have been spent on defense costs and weapons purchases; But in this competition, America has played a more prominent and important role than other world powers in this region. An important question that is raised in connection with this process is, what was the reason for the prominent role of America in increasing the arms race of West Asian countries? The results show that the United States, as a leading and hegemonic power, has defined the arms trade in West Asia in terms of domestic, regional and global goals, and the causes of the prominent role of the United States can be domestically due to the prosperity of the economy and the arms industry. At the regional level, as a result of the increasing deterrence power of the United States of West Asia against Iran, it includes justifying its presence in West Asia to gain regional hegemony, forming its desired order to dominate the region and fight against terrorism, and at the international level, maintaining and promoting his hegemony in competition with great powers. The theoretical framework of this article is designed based on the theory of neo-realism and the concepts of defense economy. And by using the library method, he collected the data and analyzed them with a descriptive-analytical approach. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| America, West Asia, Arms Race, Iran, Aggressive Realism | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
بریگان، فریدا. (1388). نقش ایالات‌متحده در نظامی سازی جهان. ماهنامه سیاحت غرب، شماره 69، 86-85.
حافظ‌نیا، محمدرضا. (1391). مقدمه‌ای بر روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی. تهران: سمت.
طاهری، ابوالقاسم. (1389). روش تحقیق در علوم سیاسی. تهران: قومس.
قاسمی، فرهاد؛ پورجم، بهاره. (1394). رقابت تسلیحاتی، ثبات راهبردی و نظم منطقه‌ای غرب آسیا. مجله سیاست دفاعی، 23(90)،107-79.
قوام، سید عبدالعلی. (1392). اصول سیاست خارجی و سیاست بین‌الملل. تهران: سمت.
مرشایمر، جان. ج. (1389). تراژدی سیاست قدرت‌های بزرگ (ترجمه غلامعلی چگینی‌زاده). تهران: وزارت امور خارجه.
Anderton, C. H. (1995). Chapter 18 Economics of arms trade. Handbook of Defense Economics,1(1), 523-561. Aerospace, R.C. (2018). U.S. DEFENSE EXPORTS 2018: STATISTICAL OVER. https://www.aia-aerospace.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/AIA-Defense-Exports-Statistical-Overview-Economic-Impact-2018-WebFinal.pdf Bowman. B. L. (2020). Objectives of U. S Arms Salws to the Gulfs: Examining strategic Goles, Risks and benefits. F.D.D: House committee on foreign Affires. Access Date: June 16: https://www.fdd.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Bradley-Bowman-HFAC-testimony-on-U.S.arms-sales-to-the-Gulf.pdf Clayton, T. (2017). Arms Sales in the Middle East: Trends and Analytical Perspectives for U.S. Policy: Analyst in Middle Eastern Affairs, Congressional Research Service, Access Date: Updated 11October: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R44984/5. Cordesman, A. H. (2016). The Changing Patterns of Arms Imports in the Middle East and North Africa. Center for Strategic and International Studies, Access Date: Updated February 16:https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/160205_cordesman_changing_arms_race_MENA.pdf Cordesman, A., Harrington, N. (2018).The Arab Gulf States and Iran: Military Spending, Modernization, and the Shifting Military Balance. Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036. Access Date: December 12: https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/181212_Iran_GCC_Balance.Report.pdf Cordesman, A. H. (2020). The Changing Security Dynamics of the Middle East and North Africa, Center for Strategic and International Studies(CSIS), BURK CHAIR IN STRATEGY. Access Date: January 19: https://www.csis.org/analysis/middle-east-and-north-africa-international-relations-changing-dynamics-regional-and Congressional, R. S. (2020). Arms Sales in the Middle East: Trends andAnalytical Perspectives for U.S. Policy, crs report preparted for members and committees of congress. Access Date: November 23: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/mideast/R44984.pdf Cohen, J. and Thrall, T. (2020). The US Is Selling Arms to Riskier Clients. CATO INSTITUTE, Access Date: OCTOBER: https://www.cato.org/commentary/us-selling-arms-riskier-clients Da silva, D., Tian, N., Sudreau, l., Marksteiner, A and liangx, I. (2022). TRENDS IN WORLD MILITARY EXPENDITURE, SIPRI Fact Sheet, Access Date: April:https://sipri.org/sites/default/files/202204/fs_2204_milex_2021_0.pdf. Freeman, S. (2009). ARMS TRANSFERS TO the Middle Ea. SIPRI, Access Date: July: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/files/misc/SIPRIBP0907.pdf Gangopadhyay, P. (2013). Sipri, Is an arms race just a race to the bottom?. Access Date: 26 September: https://www.sipri.org/commentary/blog/2013/arms-race-just-race-bottom Hoffman, J. (2021 (. The Return of Great-Power Competition to the Middle East: A Two-Level Game. Middle East Policy,28 (1),1–18, https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12539 HARTUNG, W., AND ELIAS, Y. (2020). U.S. ARMS SALES TRENDS 2020 AND BEYOND FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN, Center for International Policy, | Washington, D.C. Access Date: April: file:///C:/Users/x22/Downloads/US-Arms-Sales-Trends-2020.pdf Hartley, K. (2007). THE ARMS INDUSTRY, PROCUREMENT AND INDUSTRIALPOLICIES. Handbook of Defense Economics, Volume 2, Edited by Todd Sandler and Keith Hartley: University of York, England, UK: © 2007 Elsevier B.V. 1139–1176. Hartley, K. (2020). DEFENCE ECONOMICS: Achievements and Challenges. University of York: Cambridge University Press. Jarzabek, A. (2016). G.C.C. Military Spending in Era of Low Oil Prices. Middle East Institute Policy, Focus Series. Access Date.: August 2016: https://www.mei.edu/sites/default/files/publications/PF19_Jarzabek_GCCmilitary_web.pdf JAFFE, A., ELASS, J. (2016). War and the Oil Price Cycle. Journal of international affairs: clumbia, sipa: Access Date: FEB 14: https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/online-articles/war-and-oil-price-cycle. Jones, S G., Daniels, S P. (2022). U.S. DEFENSE POSTURE IN THE MIDDLE EAST. Center for Strategic and International Studies(CSIS), A Report of the CSIS Transnational Threats Project.ROWMAN LITTLFELD: Lanham Boulder New York London. Access Date: May 19: https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-defense-posture-middle-east. Ostermeyer, W., Abramson. J. (2021). Arms control Association, U.S. Continues Controversial Arms Assistance. Access Date: November: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2021-11/news/us-continues-controversial-arms-assistance. Prifti, B. (2014). Continuation in US Foreign Policy: An Offensive Realist Perspective, Graduate Theses and Dissertations. University of South Florida: Scholar Commons. Access Date: October 20: https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6584&context=etd. Punia, S., Finaud, M. (2022). The Middle East is a self-perpetuating cycle of conflict and arms sales. Responsible statecraft. Access Date: February, https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2022/02/07/the-middle-east-is-a-self-perpetuating-cycle-of-conflict-and-arms-sales/. Pearson, F., Lounsbery, M., Sislin, J. (2008). Arms Trade. Economics of, 2008 Elsevier Inc. Robinson, N. (2021). Middle East: ASSESSING THE GLOBAL OPERATING ENVIRONMENT. The Heritage Foundation, 160-143, Access Date: Oct 20: https://www.heritage.org/military-strength/assessing-the-global-operating-environment/middle-east. Sipri. (2021). Military expenditure by country as percentage of gross domestic product 1988-2020. (see below for 2005-2020), Access Date:2021: https://sipri.org/sites/default/files/Data%20for%20all%20countries%20from%201988%E2%80%932020%20as%20a%20share%20of%20GDP%20%28pdf%29.pdf Sipri. (2020). TRENDS IN INTERNATIONAL ARMS TRANSFERS 2019. Access Date: March: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2020-03/fs_2003_at_2019.pdf Sipri. (2020). USA and France dramatically increase major arms exports; Saudi Arabia is largest arms importer. says SIPRI, Access Date: 9 March 2020. https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2020/usa-and-france-dramatically-increase-major-arms-exports-saudi-arabia-largest-arms-importer-says. Sipri. (2019). Global arms trade: USA increases dominance; arms flows to the Middle East surge, says SIPRI. Published online: 11 March 2019:https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2019/global-arms-trade-usa-increases-dominance-arms-flows-middle-east-surge-says-sipri. Sipri. (2022), International arms transfers. Access Date:mars: https://www.sipri.org/research/armament-and-disarmament/arms-and-military-expenditure/international-arms-transfers. Sipri. (2022). Global arms trade falls slightly, but imports to Europe. East Asia and Oceania rise, Access Date: 14 March: https://sipri.org/media/press-release/2022/global-arms-trade-falls-slightly-imports-europe-east-asia-and-oceania-rise. Sipri. (b2022). World military expenditure passes $2 trillion for first time, Access Date: 25 April: https://sipri.org/media/press-release/2022/world-military-expenditure-passes-2-trillion-first. SIPRI. (2019). Global arms trade: USA increases dominance; arms flows to the Middle East surge. says SIPRI, Access Date: 11 March: https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2019/global-arms-trade-usa-increases-dominance-arms-flows-middle-east-surge-says-sipri. SIPI. (2022). World military expenditure passes $2 trillion for first time. Access Date: 25 April: https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2022/world-military-expenditure-passes-2-trillion-first-time. Stohl, R. (2021). Improving U.S. Conventional Arms Policies. Arms control Association, Access Date: January/February: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2021-01/features/improving-us-conventional-arms-policies. Stohl, R. (2008). Questionable Reward: Arms Sales and the War on Terrorism. Arms control Association. Access Date: 2008: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2008-01/features/questionable-reward-arms-sales-war-terrorism. Sanders, G. (2021). Arms Trade Reform Options for the New Administration and Congress. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Access Date: February 5: https://www.csis.org/analysis/arms-trade-reform-options-new-administration-and-congress. Snyder, G. H. (2002). Mearsheimer’s World Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security. International Security, 27(1), 149–173. Toft, p. (2005). John J. Mearsheimer: an offensive realist between geopolitics and power. Journal of International Relations and Development, 8(4), 381–408. Thrall, T., Dorminey, C. (2018). Risky Business: The Role of Arms Sales in U.S. Foreign Policy. CATO INSTITUTE: POLICY ANALYSIS, NO. 836. Access Date: March 13: https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa-836.pdf Wezeman, P., kuimova, A., Wezeman, S. (2021). TRENDS IN INTERNATIONAL ARMS TRANSFERS. Access Date: March: https://sipri.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/fs_2103_at_2020.pdf Wezeman, P D. (2018). Saudi Arabia, armaments and conflict in the Middle East. SIPRI, Access Date: December: https://www.sipri.org/commentary/topical-backgrounder/2018/saudi-arabia-armaments-and-conflict-middle-east. Wivel, A. (2017). Realism in Foreign Policy Analysis. poliltics, Access Date: 26 September: https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-475?print=pdf. Willardson, S. L., Johnson, R. (2021). Arms transfers and international relations theory: Situating military aircraft sales in the broader IR context. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 39(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894221992034. WEISS, A. (2021). Managing Russia’s Ambitions. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,1-6. Access date: May 18: https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/05/18/managing-russia-s-ambitions-pub-84528. wezeman, p., kuimova, A., fleurant, A., da silva, D., tian, N., wezeman, S. (2020). TRENDS IN INTERNATIONAL. ARMS TRANSFERS, 2019.SIPRI. Access Date: March: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2020-03/fs_2003_at_2019.pdf. Ward, A. (2021). The US may still be helping Saudi Arabia in the Yemen war after all. Vox. Access Date: Apr 27: https://www.vox.com/2021/4/27/22403579/biden-saudi-yemen-war-pentagon. Zunes, S. (1999). Continuing Storm: The U.S. Role in the Middle East. institute for policy Studies, Access Date: April 1: https://www.google.com/search?q=Continuing+Storm%3A+The+U.S.+Role+in+the+Middle+East%2Cinstitute+for+policy+Studies%2C&oq=Continuing+Storm%3A+The+U.S.+Role+in+the+Middle+East%2Cinstitute+for+policy+Studies%2C&aqs=chrome.69i57.581j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8. JORDÁN, J. (2018).El conflicto internacional en la zona gris: una propuesta teórica desde la perspectiva del realismo ofensivo. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 48 (4), 129-151, Doi: https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.48.05. Revista del Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos. (2019). Security policies in the Maghreb from the perspective of offensive realism. 13 (1), 47 - 78. Vito, C. (2020), EL MODELO GEOPOLÍTICO DE LOS PARTIDOS INTERNACIONALES ENTRE EL REALISMO OFENSIVO Y LA GEOPOLÍTICA CRÍTICA. Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana, 14(2), 166-189. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 742 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 270 |
||