تعداد نشریات | 38 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,244 |
تعداد مقالات | 9,008 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,864,505 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,717,733 |
طراحی الگوی حکمرانی دانش بنیان در دستگاههای اجرایی | ||
مدیریت راهبردی دانش سازمانی | ||
مقاله 1، دوره 7، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 25، تیر 1403، صفحه 11-42 اصل مقاله (941.95 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی با اصالت | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.47176/smok.2024.1709 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
سیده صدف وشکائی نژاد1؛ محمد دوستار* 2؛ اسماعیل ملک اخلاق3؛ کیخسرو یاکیده3 | ||
1دانشجو دکتری، مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران. | ||
2دانشیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران | ||
3دانشیار گروه مدیریت دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 11 دی 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 13 بهمن 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 21 فروردین 1403 | ||
چکیده | ||
امروزه حکمرانی دانشبنیان میتواند، اقدامی ارزشمند و تاثیرگذار در جهت بهبود عملکرد نهادهای دولتی و خصوصی باشد. لذا، رعایت اصول حکمرانی دانش بنیان میتواند به بهبود وضعیت سازمانها و دستگاههای اجرایی و جامعه کمک نماید و سبب استفاده حداکثری از توانایی افراد، کاهش چالشهای پیشروی جامعه شده و درنتیجه رفاه عمومی جامعه را به دنبال داشته باشد. این پژوهش با روش کیفی از نوع نطریه داده بنیاد با رویکرد اشتراوس و کوربین انجام شده است جامعه آماری این پژوهش از خبرگان آشنا با موضوع تشکیل شده که با 12 نفر از آنها با استفاده از روش نمونهگیری قضاوتی و گلولهبرفی مصاحبه عمیق، صورت گرفت. تحلیل دادهها به کمک نرم افزار MAXQDA انجام شده است. تعداد 302 کد باز شناسایی شده در قالب 46 زیر مقوله و 18 مقوله اصلی قرار گرفتهاند که در 6 طبقه اصلی به عناوین شرایط علی شامل تسهیم، خلق، حفظ و نگهداری دانش و شایستگی مدیران و شرایط زمینهای شامل ایجاد زیرساخت، ساختار سازمانی و فرهنگ سازمان است. شرایط واسطهای در برگیرنده مولفههای قوانین و رویهها، ارزیابی عملکرد، شفافیت، تیمسازی، سیستم جذب و نگهداری، سیستم برنامهریزی و اداره است. مولفههای قابلیت پویای نوآوری و استراتژی توسعهگرا جز شرایط راهبردی است. پیامدهای حکمرانی دانشبنیان با ارتقای عملکرد جامعه، عملکرد سازمان و عملکرد کارکنان مشخص میشود. شرایط محوری نیز حکمرانی دانشبنیان است. رویکرد دادهبنیاد پژوهش و طراحی الگو در دستگاههای اجرایی جنبه منحصر به فرد بودن دارد و میتواند تسهیلگر پیادهسازی حکمرانی دانشبنیان در دستگاههای اجرایی کشور باشد | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
تصمیم گ11یری مبتنی بر داده؛ حکمرانی دانش؛ حکمرانی هوشمند؛ سازمان یادگیرنده | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Design a knowledge-based governance model in executive organizations | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Seyedeh Sadaf Veshkaei Nejad1؛ Mohammad Doustar2؛ Esmaei Malekakhlagh3؛ Keikhosro Yakideh3 | ||
1Ph.D. Candidate in Business Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Guilan, Iran. | ||
2Associate Professor of The Management Group, Management, and Economics Faculty, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran | ||
3Associate Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Nowadays, knowledge-based governance can have a valuable impact on improving the performance of both government and private institutions. However, there is a possibility of overlooking the influential factors on this type of governance. Therefore, adherence to the principles of knowledge-based governance can contribute to improving the situation of organizations, and society, allowing for the maximum utilization of individuals' abilities, reducing societal challenges, and ultimately pursuing the public welfare. This research has employed a qualitative methodology and is based on Grounded theory, using the approaches of Strauss and Corbin. The study population consists of experts familiar with the subject, with 12 of them being selected through purposive and snowball sampling methods for in-depth interviews. We used MAXQDA software to analyse the data. 302 codes are identified and placed in the 46 subcategories and 18 main categories, which are in 6 main categories under the headings of causal conditions, including sharing, creating, preserving and maintaining knowledge, competence of managers. background conditions, including creating infrastructure, structure organization and culture of the organization. Intermediate conditions include rules and procedures, performance evaluation, transparency, team building, recruitment and retention, planning and administration system. The innovation dynamic capability and development strategy are strategic conditions. The performance of the society, organization and the employees are the consequence. The central condition is knowledge-based governance. The Grounded approach and model design in executive organizations has a unique aspect and facilitate the implementation of knowledge governance in executive organizations of the country. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Data-informed decision making, Intelligent governance, Knowledge-base governance, Learning Organization | ||
مراجع | ||
Administrative System Reform Roadmap, President's Management and Human Capital Development Vice President, (2013) [In Persian] Ahmadi, Ali Akbar; Salehi, Ali. (2011). Knowledge Management, First Edition, Payam noor Publisher. [In Persian] Akhavan, M., Roshandel Arbatani, T., Aqili, S. V., & Khajeheian, D. (2023). A Comparative Study of Audiovisual Governance Frameworks in Russia, Turkey and South Korea. Journal of Public Administration, 15(2), 258-292. [In Persian] Ali Yari, Sh., Zare Pour, J., & Mohammad Pour, M. (2011). Identifying and analyzing the difference and commonality of frameworks, concepts and theories of knowledge governance in project-oriented organizations using a comparative-content approach. National governance conference. [In Persian] Ali, I., Musawir, A. U., and Ali, M. (2018). “Impact of knowledge sharing and absorptive capacity on project performance: the moderating role of social processes”. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(2), pp. 453– 477. Bahari, B. & Taheri Rouzbahani, M. (2023). Designing an electronic human resources management model based on knowledge creation in knowledge-based companies. Journal of value creating in Business Management, 3(1), 106-121. [In Persian] Bashokouh, M., & Ghasemi hamedani, I. (2022). Investigation the effect of knowledge management on the performance and loyalty of employees with the moderating role of innovation (case study: employees of Tabriz Petrochemical Company). Scientific Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 5(4), 75-109. [In Persian] Bavakhani, A., Rezaei Sharifabadi, S., Ghaebi, A., & Najafi, M. (2020). Developing Organizational Knowledge Creation model in Knowledge-based Firms of Iran. Library and Information Sciences, 23(1), 121-150. [In Persian] Beygi, V., Abooyee Ardakan, M., Moghimi, S. M., & Nobakht, M. B. (2021). Designing a Governance Model for State-owned Enterprises under General Policies of Resistance Economy. Journal of Public Administration, 15(1), 12-40. [In Persian] Boghrati, F., ShamiZanjani, M., & Manian, A. (2019). Designing a Conceptual Framework for Knowledge Governance in Project-Based Organizations. Iranian Journal of Information Management, 4(2), 129-150. [In Persian] Bunders, D.J.; Varró, K. Problematizing data-driven urban practices: Insights from five Dutch ‘smart cities. Cities 2019, 93, 145–152. Burlamaqui, L. (2012). Knowledge Governance: an analytical approach and its policy implications. Knowledge Governance: Reasserting the Public Interest, 3-26. Cao, Y. and Xiang, Y. (2012), "The impact of knowledge governance on knowledge sharing", Management Decision, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 591-610. Carter, David. (2017). A Competency Framework for Governance: The knowledge, skills and behaviours needed for effective governance in maintained schools, academies and multi-academy trusts. England Department for Education. chegeni, H., & keshtkar, M. (2022). Intelligent governance (knowledge-based) based on the model of developing the functions of think tanks. Islamic Politics Research, 10(21), 293-327. [In Persian] Colabi, A. M., & Yaghoubi, N. M. (2022). Developing a Sustainable Governance Model with an Emphasis on Entrepreneurial Development. Journal of Public Administration, 14(2), 195-214. [In Persian] Danaei F., Hassan & Mozafari, Z. (2007). Enhancing validity and reliability in qualitative management research: a reflection on research audit strategies. Management Research, 1(1), 131-162. [In Persian] Danaei, N., Namdarzadegan, M., & Zare, R. (2020). Investigating the Impact of Knowledge Governance on Project Performance: Explaining the Moderating Role of Social Processes and the Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing and Absorptive Capacity. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 10(3), 91-107. [In Persian] Doleh, F., Seyfollahi, S., & Zanjani, H. (2018). Impact of Social Capital on Good Governance (Case Study: Students of Islamic Azad University, Tehran Science and Research Branch). Strategic Studies on Youth and Sports, 17(40), 153-176. [In Persian] Durst, S. & Edvardsson, I. R. (2012). Knowledge Management in SMEs: A Literature Review.Journal of Knowledge Management, 16 (6), 879–903. Edmondson, Amy C. (2012). Teaming: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge Economy. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass. Expediency Council, (2010). General policies of the system. [In Persian] Foss, N. J. (2007). The emerging knowledge governance approach: Challenges and characteristics. Organization, 14(1), 29-52. Foss, N.J., Husted, K. and Michailova, S. (2010), “Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: levels of analysis, governance mechanisms and research directions”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 47 No. 3, pp. 455-82. Foss, Nicolai J., Knowledge Governance: Meaning, Nature, Origins, and Implications (December 1, 2011). HANDBOOK OF ECONOMIC ORGANIZATION, Anna Grandori, ed., Edward Elgar, 2012. Geraei, E. (2022). The Barriers to Establishing Knowledge Management in the Public Sector Organizations of Lorestan Province. Sciences and Techniques of Information Management, 8(3), 81-120. [In Persian] Ghaffari, M., & Igder, A. (2017). Developmental State; Prerequisite for Realization of Good Governance. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 10(1), 103-124. [In Persian] Ghaffari, P., Pourezzat, A. A., Araei, V., & Alvani, S. M. (2023). Designing a Model of Smart Urban Governance Using a Synthesis Approach. Journal of Public Administration, 15(3), 400-438. Ghodoosi, M. R., Mahmudi, J., Musakhani, M., & Jafari, M. (2019). Proposing Knowledge Governance Framework in social Networks. Iranian Journal of Information Management, 5(1), 15-39. [In Persian] Grandori, A. 2001. Neither Hierarchy nor Identity: Knowledge Governance Mechanisms and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Management and Governance 5: 381-399. Grandori, A. and Kogut, B. 2002. Dialogue on Organization and Knowledge. Organization Science 13: 224-232. Hassanzadeh, M. (2021). Knowledge Management Guidelines in Government Organizations: A Long Way to Go. Sciences and Techniques of Information Management, 7(2), 7-20. [In Persian] Hossain, A. (2016). Knowledge Management and Governance. Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 1–9. Howell, A. (2019). Agglomeration, absorptive capacity and knowledge governance: implications for public–private firm innovation in China. Regional Studies, 1–15. Huang, M.-C., Chiu, Y.-P., & Lu, T.-C. (2013). Knowledge governance mechanisms and repatriate’s knowledge sharing: the mediating roles of motivation and opportunity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(5), 677–694. Jianyu Zhao, Xi Xi & Tao Guo. (2018) The impact of focal firm’s centrality and knowledge governance on innovation performance. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 16:2, pages 196-207. Judge, W. Q., Witt, M. A., Zattoni, A., Talaulicar, T., Chen, J. J., Lewellyn, K., ... & Van Ees, H. (2015). Corporate governance and IPO underpricing in a cross‐national sample: A multilevel knowledge‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 36(8), 1174-1185. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Marra, M., Ho, W., & Edwards, J. S. (2012). Supply chain knowledge management: A literature Martin, B. (2003). Knowledge management and local government: Some emerging. Asian Pacific Management Review, 8(1): 43-58. Maya, S. A. R. I., de Fatma LUBIS, A., Maksum, A., & Lumbanraja, P. (2018). The Influence of Organization’s Culture and Internal Control to Corporate Governance and is Impact on Bumn (State-Owned Enterprises) Corporate Performance in Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(2), 681-691. McQueen, D. V. Wismar, M. Lin, V. Jones, C. M., & Davies, M, (2012), “Intersect oral Governance for Health in all Policies Structures”, Actions and Experiences, Observatory Studies Series, No. 26. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe mohajerani, A. A., Mashayekhi, A., & Talebian, M. (2019). Corporate governance in Iran: the case of state-owned enterprises. Iranian journal of management sciences, 14(53), 1-35. [In Persian] Moinian, B., Eliasi, M., Bamdad Soufi, J., & Naghavi, M. (2021). Developing a Knowledge Worker Retention Model in Knowledge-Based Companies (Case Study: IT, Communication, and Biotechnology Companies). Journal of Sustainable Human Resource Management, 3(4), 111-89. [In Persian] Monavvarian, A., kheirandish, M., & Asgari, N. (2011). Developing Structural Dimensions in accordance with Knowledge Management Approach. Journal of Information Technology Management, 3(7), 133-150. [In Persian] Peltokorpi, V., & Tsuyuki, E. (2006). Knowledge governance in a Japanese project-based organization. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(1), 36–45. Pemsel, S., & Müller, R. (2012). The governance of knowledge in project-based organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 30(8), 865-876. Pemsel, S., Müller, R., & Söderlund, J. (2016). Knowledge Governance Strategies in Project-based Organizations. Long Range Planning, 49(6), 648–660. Praba Nair, Kamlesh Prakash. (2009), Knowledge Management Facilators Guide, APO, ISBN. rahimi, A., aliverdizadeh, H., & mahmoudabadi, S. (2023). Investigating the effect of knowledge management on organizational agility with emphasis on the mediating role of organizational innovation(Case of study: defense project-oriented organizations). Scientific Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 6(2), 21-52. [In Persian] Ruijer, erna. Van twist, Anouk, hakker, timber, et all. (2023), Smart Governance Toolbox: A Systematic Literature Review, Smart Cities 2023, 6(2), 878-896. Skorkova, Zuzana. (2016). Competency models in public sector, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 226 – 234. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution (2010). Comprehensive scientific map of the country. [In Persian] Tan, K., Yuen, Y & Ha, L. (2018). “Factors affecting knowledge governance implementation among Malaysian SMEs”. Management Science Letters, 8(5), 405-416. Tavakkoli, A., & Bozorg H., Elham. (2015). Peresent a model of Managers Competencies public sector based on the good governance paradigm. International Conference of Economics and Social Sciences. [In Persion] Teece, J. David., & Pisano, A. Shuen. (1997). "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management". Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 509-533. Teen, M. Y., & Phan, P. H. (2001). Corporate governance in Asia: a comparative perspective. OECD. Tomastika, Marek., & Strohmandlb, Jan., and Cechc, Petr. (2015). Managerial competency of crisis managers. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 17(4). Tseng, S.-M. (2016), "Knowledge management capability, customer relationship management, and service quality", Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 29 No. 2. 202-221. Van Kerkhoff, L., & Pilbeam, V. (2017). Understanding socio-cultural dimensions of environmental decision-making: A knowledge governance approach. Environmental Science & Policy, 73, 29–37. Wiig, K. (2012). People-focused knowledge management. Routledge. Wood, G., & Wright, D. M. (2010). An Age of Corporate Governance Failure? In the Oxford Handbook of Corporate Governance. Oxford handbooks. Yavarian, A., Tootian Esfahani, S., Mirsepasi, N., & Memarzadeh Tehran, G. (2022). Designing a Model for Promoting Public Welfare Based on Good Governance. Journal of Public Administration, 14(2), 283-312. [In Persian] Ye, X., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y. and Li, H. (2021), "How do knowledge governance mechanisms impact on repatriate knowledge transfer intention? The moderating role of perceived career and repatriation support and person-organization fit", Management Decision, Vol. 59 No. 2, pp. 324-340. Zack, Micheal.H.(2003). What is a Knowledge-based organization? 5 th international conference organizational learning and Knowledge, Friday, 30 th may – Monday, 2nd June, 1-7. Zarepour, J., Aliari, S., & Mahmoodi, J. (2019). Designing a Framework for Knowledge Governance in Khatam Al-anbia Construction Site. Scientific Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 2(1), 11-43. [In Persian] | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 608 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 356 |