اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 34 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,289 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,294 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,800,467 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,339,926 |
شناسایی و اعتبارسنجی پیشایندها و پیامدهای احتکار دانش توسط کارکنان دانشی | ||
| مدیریت راهبردی دانش سازمانی | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 7، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 25، تیر 1403، صفحه 107-132 اصل مقاله (911.01 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی با اصالت | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.47176/smok.2024.1718 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| هادی افضلی* 1؛ حسین دامغانیان2؛ علیرضا مقدم2؛ ناصر عسگری3 | ||
| 1دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری دانشگاه سمنان، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشکده اقتصاد ، مدیریت و علوم اداری دانشگاه سمنان، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشیار دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه هوایی شهید ستاری، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| احتکار دانش توسط کارکنان دانشی، سازمان را از منابع بسیار ارزشمندی محروم می‌سازد و می‌تواند پیامدهای مستقیم و غیرمستقیم فراوانی در پی‌داشته باشد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی و اعتبارسنجی پیشایندها و پیامدهای احتکار دانش توسط کارکنان دانشی انجام شده است. این پژوهش کاربردی با رویکرد آمیخته متوالی اکتشافی انجام گردیده است. شناسایی عوامل با رویکرد کیفی و با استفاده از روش تحلیل مضمون صورت پذیرفته است. مشارکت کنندگان این مرحله شامل اعضای هیئت علمی و خبرگان فنی منتخب نهاجا بوده‌اند که برای پیمایش دیدگاه آنان، از مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته و برای اعتبارسنجی عوامل شناسایی شده در مرحله کمی از روش مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری (تحلیل عاملی تاییدی) استفاده شده است. به این منظور پرسشنامه‌ای براساس عوامل احصاء شده طراحی و در میان خبرگان فنی منتخب به صورت هدفمند توزیع شد تا روابط بین شاخص‌ها و مقوله‌ها ارزیابی شود. داده‌های مرحله کمی با استفاده از نرم افزار Smart Pls نسخه 3 مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند. یافته‌ها نشان داد پیشایندهای احتکار دانش شامل عوامل فردی (تمایلات و علایق، دغدغه‌ها و نگرانی‌ها، انگیزه‌ها، صفات و ویژگی‌های فردی)، عوامل میان‌فردی (عوامل ارتباطی)، عوامل سازمانی (عوامل شغلی، فرهنگ سازمانی، عوامل مدیریتی، عوامل ساختاری)، عوامل فراسازمانی (عوامل اجتماعی، فرهنگی و عوامل اقتصادی) بوده است. همچنین پیامدهای احتکار دانش نیز به دو دسته پیامدهای فردی و سازمانی طبقه‌بندی شدند. تحلیل‌های کمی نیز معنی‌داری ارتباط بین شاخص‌ها و مولفه‌های مورد نظر را تایید کردند. نتایج این پژوهش می‌تواند برای مدیریت نمودن پدیده احتکار دانش، شناخت مفیدی در این زمینه فراهم سازد. شناسایی همزمان عوامل موثر بر بروز احتکار دانش در سطوح چهارگانۀ پیش‌گفته و همچنین پیامدهایی که این عارضه می‌تواند برای کارکنان دانشی و سازمان در پی داشته باشد می‌تواند شناخت موثری برای مدیریت این رفتار مخرب سازمانی فراهم سازد. توجه همزمان به ریشه‌ها و پیامدهای فردی و سازمانی این عارضه وجه تمایز برجسته این پژوهش به شمار می‌رود. واژه‌های کلیدی: دانش سازمانی، احتکار دانش، تمایل به احتکار دانش، رفتارهای احتکار دانش، مدیریت تمایل به رفتارهای احتکار دانش | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| دانش سازمانی؛ احتکار دانش؛ تمایل به احتکار دانش؛ رفتارهای احتکار دانش؛ مدیریت تمایل به رفتارهای احتکار دانش | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Identifying and validating the antecedents and consequences of knowledge hoarding by knowledge workers | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hadi Afzali1؛ Hosein Damghanian2؛ Alireza Moghaddam2؛ Naser Asgari3 | ||
| 1Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Iran. | ||
| 2Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Iran. | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Faculty of Management, Shahid Sattari Air University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Knowledge hoarding by knowledge workers deprives the organization of very valuable resources and can have many direct and indirect consequences. This research was conducted with the aim of identifying and validating its. This applied research has been done with a mixed sequential exploratory approach. Factors have been identified with a qualitative approach using thematic analysis method. The participants of this stage were the selected technical experts of Nahaja, and a semi-structured interview was used to survey their views. The quantitative stage was carried out in order to validate the identified factors. For this purpose, a questionnaire distributed among selected thecnical experts. These data were analysed through structural equation modeling (confirmatory factor analysis) and Smart Pls version 3 software. The findings showed that the antecedents of knowledge hoarding include individual factors (tendencies and interests, concerns and worries, motivations, individual traits and characteristics), interpersonal factors (communication factors), organizational factors (occupational factors, culture organizational, managerial factors, and structural factors), extra-organizational factors (social, cultural and economic factors). Also, the consequences of knowledge hoarding were classified into two categories of individual and organizational consequences. Quantitative analyzes also confirmed the significance of the relationship between the desired indicators and components. The results of this research can provide useful knowledge in this field to manage the phenomenon of knowledge hoarding. The simultaneous identification of factors affecting the occurrence of knowledge hoarding in the aforementioned four levels, as well as the consequences of this complication for knowledge workers and the organization, can provide an effective understanding for the management of this destructive organizational behavior. The simultaneous attention to the roots and individual and organizational consequences of this complication is considered the outstanding distinguishing feature of this research. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Organizational knowledge management, knowledge hoarding, knowledge hoarding behavior, antecidents of knowledge hoarding, consequences of knowledge hoarding | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Acharya, A. (2023). Unveiling the Notion of “Knowledge Hoarding” in a Post-Epidemic global Business Environment. In Human Resource Management in a Post-Epidemic Global Environment: Roles, Strategies, and Implementation (pp. 65-80). Apple Academic Press. Albana, M. J., & Yeşiltaş, M. (2021). Impact of linguistic ostracism on knowledge sharing, hiding and hoarding and the moderating role of cultural intelligence. Kybernetes. Aljawarneh, N. M., Abd kader Alomari, K., Alomari, Z. S., & Taha, O. (2020). Cyber incivility and knowledge hoarding: Does interactional justice matter? VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. Andalib, M., & Solimani, M. (2017). Identification and Ranking the factors of hoarding outbreak; Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Islamic Economics Studies Bi-quarterly Journal, 10(1), 41-58. doi: 10.30497/ies.2017.2105. [In Persian] Arpaci, I., Al-Emran, M., & Al-Sharafi, M. A. (2020). The impact of knowledge management practices on the acceptance of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) by engineering students: A cross-cultural comparison. Telematics and informatics, 54, 101468. Barney, J. B. & Clark, D. N. (2007). Resource-Based Theory: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Oxford University Press. Basiri, M., Nori,H., Kalantari,A., Faridpor,D.(2023). Examining the role of key organizational factors in the implementation of knowledge management in military organizations (case study of the Air Force of the Islamic Republic of Iran). Army Strategic Research, 1(2), 65-92. [In Persian] Bilginoğlu, E. (2019). Knowledge hoarding: A literature review. Management Science Letters, 9(1), 61-72. Biranvand A, Zareei S, Golshani M.(2021). The effect of organizational climate and knowledge sharing on the innovative behavior of employees in knowledge-based companies. Human and information interaction,7 (4), 15-29. [In Persian] Butali, N. D., Wesang’ula, P. M., & Mamuli, L. C. (2013). Effects of staff turnover on the employee performance of work at Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology. Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications. Dash, S., & Saini, G. (2023). Are cohesive and mindful employees in India more likely to hoard knowledge? The mediating effect of meaning-making through work. Journal of Knowledge Management. Davali, M. M., & Karimifard, A. (2023). Identifying and prioritizing the antecedents of lack of knowledge sharing among the employees of Rafsanjan Industrial Complex. Scientific Journal of Organizational Knowledge Management, 6(2), 141-182. [In Persian] De Sordi, J. O., Azevedo, M. C. D., Bianchi, E. M. P. G., & Carandina, T. (2021). Defining the term knowledge worker: Toward improved ontology and operationalization. Knowledge and Process Management, 28(1), 56-70. Dehghani darmyani, F., Ahi, G., & Shahabizadeh, F. (2018). The Relationship Between of Anthropomorphism and Attachment to Objects with Hoarding Behaviors: Mediating Role of Saving Cognitions. Journal of Psychological Studies, 14(3), 113-130. doi: 10.22051/psy.2018.17224.1488. [In Persian] Evans, J. M., Hendron, M. G., & Oldroyd, J. B. (2015). Withholding the ace: the individual-and unit-level performance effects of self-reported and perceived knowledge hoarding. Organization Science, 26(2), 494-510. Gall, Borg (2003). Quantitative and qualitative research methods in educational sciences and psychology, Translated by Ahmadreza Nasr et al., (2007), Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press. [In Persian] Gonçalves, T. (2022). Knowledge hiding and knowledge hoarding: Using grounded theory for conceptual development. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 10. Goncalves, T., Curado, C., & Oliveira, M. (2023). Clarifying knowledge withholding: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113600. oswami, A. K., & Agrawal, R. K. (2023). It’sa knowledge centric world! Does ethical leadership promote knowledge sharing and knowledge creation? Psychological capital as mediator and shared goals as moderator. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(3), 584-612. Holten, A. L., Hancock, G. R., Persson, R., Hansen, Å. M., & Høgh, A. (2016). Knowledge hoarding: antecedent or consequent of negative acts? The mediating role of trust and justice. Journal of knowledge management. Jiang, Y., Liao, J., Chen, J., Hu, Y., & Du, P. (2021). Motivation for users' knowledge-sharing behavior in virtual brand communities: a psychological ownership perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. Keshavarzi, A., Yektai, M. (2011). Removing obstacles to knowledge sharing in the organization based on Islamic teachings. Management in Islamic University, 1(2), 123-142. [In Persian] Kheiry, F., Karimi, F., & Nadi, M. A. (2021). Identify barriers to knowledge sharing among teachers. Educational Development of Judishapur, 12(0), 204-215. doi: 10.22118/edc.2020.249425.1539. [In Persian] Moinian, B., Eliasi, M., Bamdad Soufi, J., & Naghavi, M. (2021). Developing a Knowledge Worker Retention Model in Knowledge-Based Companies (Case Study: IT, Communication, and Biotechnology Companies). Journal of Sustainable Human Resource Management, 3(4), 111-89. doi: 10.22080/shrm.2021.3321. [In Persian] Nemati, H., Rahimi Gaini, A., & Rohani, R. (1395). On the Ethical Management. Journal of Studies in Religion, Spirituality & Management, 5(10), 109-136. [In Persian] Opele, J. K., Adepoju, K. O., & Adegbite, W. M. (2020). Barriers to Knowledge Management Practices, Interprofessional Collaboration and Information Technology Application in Federal Tertiary Hospitals in Nigeria. Canadian Social Science, 16(12), 35-41. Parhamnia, F. (2021). The Behavioral Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing: A Systematic Review of One Decade of Research in Persian Databases. Scientific Journal of Organizational Knowledge Management, 4(2), 129-185. [In Persian] Rahmani Meybodi, O., & Salehnejad, S. A. (2021). The Interpretation and Localization of the Effective Cultural Components of Knowledge Sharing (Case Study: A Governmental Organization). Scientific Journal of Organizational Knowledge Management, 4(3), 63-101. [In Persian] Ratna, S., Saide, S., Herzavina, H., & Muwardi, D. (2023). A preliminary model analysis of knowledge management design: spiritual leadership on knowledge worker productivity. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 35(3), 270-285. Salehi, M.,Ghanbarian Ghalandar,P., Vakili.,Donya.(2020).The understanding and experience of school teachers from the concept of professional capital is a phenomenological study. School Administration, 8(2), 217-203. doi: https://doi.org/10.34785/J010.2020.556. [In Persian] Sarwar, A., Khan, M. M., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2017). Despotic Leadership, Workplace Ostracism and Knowledge Hoarding: A Serial Mediation Model. SAM Advanced Management Journal (07497075), 82(4). Scuotto, V., Nespoli, C., Tran, P. T., & Cappiello, G. (2022). An alternative way to predict knowledge hiding: The lens of transformational leadership. Journal of Business Research, 140, 76-84. Silva de Garcia, P., Oliveira, M., & Brohman, K. (2020). Knowledge sharing, hiding and hoarding: how are they related? Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1-13. Trusson, C., Hislop, D., & Doherty, N. F. (2017). The rhetoric of “knowledge hoarding”: a research-based critique. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1540-1558. Yang, Y., Li, X., Pan, G., Cai, Y., & Shi, W. (2022). The relationship between Machiavellianism and knowledge hoarding: a moderated mediation model. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1-14. Zhao, H., & Xia, Q. (2017). An examination of the curvilinear relationship between workplace ostracism and knowledge hoarding. Management Decision. Ziyai, S., Tavakoli., S. (2014). Documenting Managers' Experiences: An Analysis of Behavioral and Cultural Factors of Managers of Astan Quds Razavi Center, National Studies of Library and Information Organization, 4(26), 139-154. [In Persian] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 451 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 277 |
||