![سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه امام حسین (ع)](./data/logo.png)
تعداد نشریات | 38 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,258 |
تعداد مقالات | 9,115 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,326,400 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,040,943 |
مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری پیادهسازی نقشه جامع علمی کشور | ||
مدیریت راهبردی دانش سازمانی | ||
دوره 7، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 26، مهر 1403، صفحه 110-131 اصل مقاله (4.01 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی با اصالت | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.47176/smok.2024.1777 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
بهرام اکبری1؛ ابوذر علی دادی تلخستانی* 2؛ محمدرضا نواب اصفهانی3؛ میثم علی پور4 | ||
1استادیار، گروه مدیریت راهبردی دانش، دانشکده مدیریت راهبردی، دانشگاه و پژوهشگاه عالی دفاع ملی و تحقیقات راهبردی، تهران، ایران | ||
2دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت راهبردی دانش، گروه راهبردی دانش، دانشکده مدیریت راهبردی، دانشگاه و پژوهشگاه عالی دفاع ملی و تحقیقات راهبردی، تهران،ایران | ||
3دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع) | ||
4دانش آموخته دکتری مدیریت دولتی، گروه تصمیم گیری و خط مشی گذاری عمومی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 03 مرداد 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 04 شهریور 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 10 شهریور 1403 | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف: هدف از پژوهش پیشرو ارائه «مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری پیاده سازی نقشۀ جامع علمی کشور» است و با شناسایی ابعاد و مؤلفههای پیادهسازی نقشه علمی کشور نسبت به تدوین الگوی پیادهسازی این نقشه برای اجرای هدفمند راهبردهای مدیریت دانش میپردازد. روش پژوهش: این پژوهش از نظر جهت گیری توسعهای و کاربردی است به طوری که با گردآوری دادههای مختلف از ادبیات موضوع، و اسنادبالادستی، الگوی مفهومی پیاده سازی نقشه علمی کشور را ارائه کرده پس توسعه ای بوده و از سوی دیگر با تعیین ارتباط بین اجزای الگوی مفهومی و سطح بندی آنها، زمینه را برای اولویتبندی و بکارگیری الگو به شکل عملی فراهم میکند فلذا کاربردی است. جامعه آماری تحقیق شامل خبرگان و مسئولان پیاده سازی نقشه علمی کشور است که حجم نمونه به صورت هدفمند 20 نفر انتخاب شده و از نظرات ایشان در پاسخگویی به معادلات ساختاری-تفسیری استفاده گردید. یافتهها: الگوی نهایی به صورت دو لایه ای و متشکل از 5 بعد شامل «عوامل انسانی»، «عوامل زیرساختی»، «عوامل مدیریتی»، «عوامل فرایندی» و «عوامل بیرونی» تدوین گردیده است. نتیجهگیری: برای پیادهسازی نقشه جامع علمی کشور باید در نظر داشت که در ابتدا نیاز است تا الزامات و ملاحظات پیادهسازی مشخص شود. همچنین فرهنگسازی در این زمینه از جمله ضروریات است. در کنار این موارد نباید از توانمندسازی مفاهیم مربوط به نقشه و پیادهسازی آن غفلت نمود. همچنین توجه به مطالعات نوآوری در پیادهسازی نیز از جمله رویکردهای مهم و موردنیاز در فرایند پیادهسازی است. در پایان نیز انجام ارزیابی، نظارت و واپایش فعالیتهای مربوط به پیادهسازی نقشه جامع علمی از موارد ضروری این حوزه است. در این میان، عوامل انسانی اثرگذارترین بعد و پس از آن عوامل مدیریتی و عوامل بیرونی در سطح بعدی اثرگذاری قرار می گیرد، همچنین عوامل فرآیندی از هر سه عامل قبلی اثر پذیر است و در نهایت عوامل زیرساختی به عنوان اثرپذیرترین بعد شناسایی شد. محدودیتهای پژوهش: استفاده صرف از پرسشنامههای خود گزارشدهی برای ارزیابی متغیرها، محدودشدن نمونه پژوهش به معلمان شهر کاشان و بررسی و جمعآوری مقطعی دادهها بود. اصالت/ارزش: شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر راهبری و سازماندهی اجزاء و عناصر اصلی نظام علم، فناوری و نوآوری الگوی برای پیادهسازی نقشه جامع علمی در کشور به طور شفاف و دقیق ارائه گردید. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری؛ نقشه جامع علمی؛ نقشه علمی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Interpretive structural modeling of the implementation of the comprehensive scientific map of Iran | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Bahram Akbari1؛ Abouzar Alidadi Talkhestani2؛ Mohammad Reza Navab Esfahani3؛ Meysam Alipour4 | ||
1Assistant Professor, Department of Strategic Knowledge Management, Faculty of Strategic Management, National Defense and Strategic Research University and Research Institute, Tehran, Iran | ||
2PhD student in Strategic Knowledge Management, Strategic Knowledge Department, Faculty of Strategic Management, University and Higher Research Institute of National Defense and Strategic Research, Tehran, Iran | ||
3imam hossain university | ||
4PhD student in Public Administration, Department of Public Policy and Decision Making, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Purpose: The present study aims to present an "interpretive structural modeling of the implementation of the country's comprehensive scientific map." Identifying the dimensions and components of the implementation of the country's scientific map involves developing an implementation model for this map to purposefully implement knowledge management strategies. Methodology: This research is developmental and applied in terms of orientation so that by collecting various data from the subject literature and upstream documents, it presents a conceptual model for implementing the country's scientific map so it is developmental and on the other hand, by determining the relationship between the components of the conceptual model and their leveling, it provides the basis for prioritizing and applying the model practically, so it is used. The statistical population of the research includes experts and officials implementing the country's scientific map, from which a sample size of 20 people was purposefully selected, and their opinions were used in responding to the structural-interpretive equations. Findings: The final model has been developed in two layers and consists of 5 dimensions, including "human factors," "infrastructural factors," "management factors," "process factors," and "external factors." The first component, titled "Implementation requirements and considerations for realizing the country's comprehensive scientific map", includes three axes: attention and application of field considerations for implementing the country's comprehensive scientific map document, considering the approach and maturity levels in implementing the country's comprehensive scientific map, creating a mechanism and paying attention to the coherence, coordination and integration of measures in implementing the country's comprehensive scientific map; The second process is called culture building as one of the necessities for realizing the implementation of the country's scientific map document, which includes three axes: Promoting the scientific and research insight of all those related to the issue of implementing the country's scientific map at different organizational levels and ranks, which will have a significant impact on realizing culture building in accordance with the priorities and strategies of the comprehensive scientific map, Developing thinking as a strategic and necessary indicator for better support of the demands and missions requested in the comprehensive scientific map document, which will have a direct impact on the implementation of the country's comprehensive scientific map, Discourse building in the sense that until the issue of realizing the implementation of the country's scientific map is recognized as a common currency, the issue of culture building will not crystallize and as a result, the implementation of the country's scientific map will not be realized. The third component is empowerment for realizing the country's comprehensive scientific map, which is defined in two issues: The need to pay attention to empowerment and skill development in implementing the country's comprehensive scientific map, which should be included in many current organizational trainings, considering the goals stated in the comprehensive scientific map document. The issue of developing skills in implementation is in placement and implementation in various educational courses. Designing and implementing the foundation program for the country's comprehensive scientific map education, considering the new content produced as well as the approaches and strategies included in the map content, requires designing, compiling, and implementing educational courses and programs in the form of foundation courses, etc., so that the issue of realizing empowerment can properly occur in the process of implementing the scientific map document. The fourth effective component in realizing the implementation process, which has a key impact on implementing the comprehensive scientific map document, is innovation studies in implementation, defined in three axes: target sociology and ecosystem studies. The realization of the implementation of the country's comprehensive scientific map should be proportionate to the accurate understanding of the target community, which is researchers and intellectuals, and the interactions and relations of this community with various organizations as the main ecosystem of the audience of the comprehensive scientific map of the country should be put on the agenda. Governance, policy research, and innovation studies: In the process of implementing the country's comprehensive scientific map, innovation expansion strategies will not be implemented and implemented except with the support of detailed studies in the field of governance, policy research, and innovation, which is the result of serious attention from relevant stakeholders and researchers; Studies of integrated patterns of transformation and improvement, this issue has a significant impact on the implementation of the country's scientific map in line with developments inside and outside the organization's environment and keeping the country's comprehensive scientific map up-to-date with these developments, and as a result, the country's better synchronization with the realization of the map's goals; The fifth process, titled evaluation, supervision, and monitoring, is also one of the priorities for implementing the country's scientific map document, which includes three axes: Implementation status assessment, this process is achieved in implementing the country's comprehensive scientific map by following up and monitoring in the field the progress of programs and executive actions, and finally, implementation status assessment and forecasting of software platforms for continuous monitoring of the implementation of the country's comprehensive scientific map; The implementation of the implementation axes and feedback from it, including the implementation of an interactive feedback system and the use of lessons learned from the implementation of the document and its use in making optimal decisions, will be completed. Also, the pilot implementation of the Comprehensive Scientific Map of the Country document with the aim of corrective feedback before the implementation of the document; dynamism (counting improvement points) based on the results of the implementation, at this stage, in addition to the learning that is created as a result of monitoring and evaluation for those involved in the implementation of the Comprehensive Scientific Map of the Country document, counting strengths and usable lessons based on the results of the implementation seems necessary for better implementation of the document in the face of future challenges. Research limitations: This study's limitations included using self-report questionnaires to assess variables, limiting the research sample to teachers in Kashan, and conducting a cross-sectional study and collecting data. Originality/value: Identifying the factors affecting the governance and organization of the main components and elements of the science, technology, and innovation system, a model for implementing a comprehensive scientific map in Iran was presented clearly and precisely. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Interpretive structural modeling, comprehensive scientific map, scientific map | ||
مراجع | ||
Arvand, N., & Baroto, M. B. (2016). How to implement strategy more effectively. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 17(3), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPM.2016.077246 Scientific, Defense And Security Map Of The Islamic Republic Of Iran In The Islamic (2017). Tehran, iran. Dalkir, K. (2022). Knowledge management in theory and practice. (4th edition). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080547367 Farzin, Maitham; Ahmadvand, Ali Mohammad; Moradi Ghasemabadi, Farajullah and Tolai, Mohammad. (2020). A model of implementing strategic documents in revolutionary organizations and institutions, strategic defense studies, National Defense University, Tehran. (in Persian) Fuertes، G.، Alfaro، M.، Vargas، M.، Gutierrez، S.، Ternero، R.، & Sabattin، J. (2020). Conceptual framework for the strategic management: a literature review descriptive. Journal of Engineering، 2020، 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6253013 Ghaffariyan, Wafa; Dafufi, Farin; Rezaei Yousefi, Alireza. (2007). A comparative study of strategy implementation patterns in the organization. Paper presented at the second international conference on strategic management. Tehran: Civilica (in Persian). Hajilo, Ali; Qaraei Ashtiani, Mohammad Reza; Shokohi, Hossein; Ahadi, Mohammad. (2023). Identifying the appropriate solutions and requirements for the implementation of training and excellence strategies for AJA commanders and managers with an emphasis on jihadi management; Strategic Defense Studies, Higher National Defense University, Tehran. (in Persian) Haji Malamirzaei, Hamid, and Hafeez Kashani, Massoud. (1400). The Presentation of a Model for Implementing Knowledge Management in the Command-and-Control System. Organizational Knowledge Management, 4(13), 127-95. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.26454262.1400.4.2.4.3 (in Persian) Hosseinpour, Abbas, and Alipour, Mohammad Bagher. (2017). Identifying factors affecting the implementation of knowledge management in the head office of Jihad University. Technology Growth, 14(54), 46-54. (in Persian) Imam Khamenei, A Collection of statements available on this site: https://khamnenei.ir Javadian, Reza, Tulabi, Zainab, and Veiseh, Seyed Mehdi. (2023). Designing a Strategic Model in E-government (Study by University Professors and Managers of Government Offices in Ilam Province), strategic management and future research, (2) 6, 71-101. (in Persian) Mackay، D.، & Zundel، M. (2017). Recovering the divide: a review of strategy and tactics in business and management. International Journal of Management Reviews، 19(2)، 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12091 Matoli, Ali, Mazloumi, Nader. (2012). A Model To Implement Of Strategic Plans, improvement and transformation management studies, number 76. https://doi.org/10.22054/jmsd.2012.1863 (in Persian) Nonaka, I. Takeuchi, H. (1995). Knowledge-Certain company: How Jepaneas Companies Of innovation. Oxford university press. Nwanzu، C.L. & Babalola، S.S.، 2019، ‘Impact of organisation ownership and strategy on organisational sustainable practices’، Academy of Strategic Management Journal 18(5)، 10–10. Pournasir، Shahin. (2013). Key success factors of strategic management implementation in SMEs in Iran. Journal of International Studies.6(2)، 65-78. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2013/6-2/6 Rostami, Mohammad Baqer, Mokhbardzfouli, Mohammad Reza, and Dehghan, Nabi- ALLAH (2016). Implementing a Practical Model of Iran’s Comprehensive Scientific Map based on Paradigmatic Grounded Theory Approach. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 6(20), 145-161. (in Persian) Shadmanfar, M. H., & Makvandi, F. (2024). Identifying barriers and facilitators of organizational knowledge sharing. International Journal of Innovation in Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 4(2), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.59615/ijimes.4.2.23 Stanitsas, M., &Kirytopoulos, K. (2021). Underlying factors for successful project management to construct sustainable built assets. Built Environment Project and Asset Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-10-2020-0166 Surbhi, s. (2018) Strategic management: meaning, stages & components.at: https://www.managementstudyguide.com/strategic-management-process.htm Stefanini, R., & Vignali, G. (2023). The influence of Industry 4.0 enabling technologies on social, economic and environmental sustainability of the food sector. International Journal of Production Research, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2248523 Vigfússon, K., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Ólafsson, S. (2021). Obstacles to strategy implementation and success factors: a review of empirical literature. Strategic Management-International Journal of Strategic Management and Decision Support Systems in Strategic Management, 26(2). | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 197 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 70 |