طراحی چارچوب مفهومی انتقال فناوری‌های پیشرفته در انقلاب صنعتی پنجم: رویکرد تحلیل مضمون

زمانی, آرزو; خمسه, عباس; ایرانبان فرد, سید جواد

doi:10.47176/smok.2025.1854

فهرست نشریات

فراخوان حمایت از طرحهای فناورانه: جوش اتوماتیک به کمک ربات پرتابل

زنجیره کاربردی سازی هوش مصنوعی

حسگرهای فروسرخ و روش های اقدام متقابل

مدلسازی و طراحی باتری های سدیم سولفور

تعداد نشریات	35
تعداد شماره‌ها	1,282
تعداد مقالات	9,261
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	8,590,291
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	5,267,187

	طراحی چارچوب مفهومی انتقال فناوری‌های پیشرفته در انقلاب صنعتی پنجم: رویکرد تحلیل مضمون
مدیریت راهبردی دانش سازمانی
مقاله 6، دوره 8، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 28، فروردین 1404، صفحه 121-145 اصل مقاله (1.49 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی با اصالت
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.47176/smok.2025.1854
نویسندگان
آرزو زمانی¹؛ عباس خمسه^* ²؛ سید جواد ایرانبان فرد³
¹دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت تکنولوژی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
²گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران
³گروه مدیریت، واحد شیراز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شیراز، ایران
تاریخ دریافت: 06 دی 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 17 بهمن 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 01 فروردین 1404
چکیده
هدف: ظهور پارادایم صنعت 5.0 با تمرکز بر تعامل هوشمندانه انسان و ماشین، چالش‌های جدیدی را در فرآیند انتقال فناوری‌های پیشرفته ایجاد کرده است. هدف این پژوهش تبیین چارچوب مفهومی جامع برای انتقال فناوری‌های پیشرفته در پارادایم صنعت 5.0 است. روش پژوهش: این پژوهش با رویکرد پراگماتیسم و استراتژی استقرایی-قیاسی انجام شده است. از میان مقالات علمی منتشر شده بین سال‌های 2017 تا 2024 در پنج پایگاه داده معتبر، 84 مقاله با نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. داده‌ها با استفاده از رویکرد ترکیبی متن‌کاوی و تحلیل مضمون تحلیل شدند. در فاز کمی از الگوریتم‌های LDAو K-means برای خوشه‌بندی مفاهیم، و در فاز کیفی از روش تحلیل مضمون براون و کلارک استفاده شد. روایی یافته‌ها با استفاده از روش مثلث‌سازی و پایایی با محاسبه ضریب توافق کاپا (83/0) تأیید گردید. یافته‌ها: تحلیل متن‌کاوی به شناسایی پنج خوشه اصلی منجر شد که شامل فناوری‌های پیشرفته (54.4%)، انتقال فناوری (8.5%)، صنعت 5.0 (19.2%)، چالش‌ها و فرصت‌ها (11.4%) و سیاست‌گذاری و قوانین (6.6%) بودند. تحلیل مضمون منجر به شناسایی 40 مضمون اصلی و 163 مضمون فرعی شد که در قالب هشت مرحله اصلی انتقال فناوری دسته‌بندی شدند. این مراحل شامل شناسایی و گزینش، اکتساب، انطباق، جذب و تحلیل، کاربرد و بهره‌برداری، توسعه و بهبود، اشاعه، و یادگیری و نوآوری است. نتیجه‌گیری: موفقیت در انتقال فناوری‌های پیشرفته در صنعت 5.0 مستلزم ایجاد یک اکوسیستم پویا و تعاملی است که در آن عوامل فنی، سازمانی، انسانی و محیطی به طور همزمان مدیریت می‌شوند. اصالت/ارزش: این پژوهش برای نخستین بار با ترکیب رویکردهای متن‌کاوی و تحلیل مضمون، چارچوبی جامع برای انتقال فناوری در پارادایم صنعت 5.0 ارائه می‌دهد که فراتر از مدل‌های خطی موجود رفته و رویکردی اکوسیستمی ارائه می‌کند. این چارچوب می‌تواند مبنایی برای پژوهش‌های آتی در حوزه انتقال فناوری‌های پیشرفته و راهنمای عمل مدیران و سیاست‌گذاران باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
انتقال فناوری؛ صنعت 5.0؛ فناوری‌های پیشرفته؛ تحول دیجیتال
عنوان مقاله [English]
Designing a Conceptual Framework for Advanced Technology Transfer in the Fifth Industrial Revolution: A Thematic Analysis Approach
نویسندگان [English]
Arezoo Zamany¹؛ Abbas Khamseh²؛ Sayedjavad Iranbanfard³
¹Ph.D. Candidate, in Department of Technology Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
²Department of Industrial Management, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
³Department of Management, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده [English]
Purpose: The emergence of Industry 5.0, characterized by enhanced human-machine collaboration and sustainability focus, has fundamentally transformed the landscape of advanced technology transfer. While Industry 4.0 primarily focused on automation and digitalization, Industry 5.0 emphasizes the synergistic integration of human capabilities with advanced technologies, creating new challenges and opportunities in technology transfer processes. Traditional technology transfer models, designed for earlier industrial paradigms, fail to address the unique requirements of Industry 5.0, particularly its emphasis on human-centricity, sustainability, and resilience. This study aims to develop a comprehensive conceptual framework for advanced technology transfer in the Industry 5.0 paradigm, addressing the critical need for understanding how emerging technologies can be effectively transferred while maintaining the human-centric and sustainable focus characteristic of this new industrial paradigm. The research specifically seeks to identify and integrate key components, stages, and success factors in the technology transfer process, considering the complex interplay between human factors, technological capabilities, and sustainability requirements that define Industry 5.0. Methodology: This study adopts a pragmatist philosophy with an abductive approach, combining quantitative text mining with qualitative thematic analysis to develop a comprehensive understanding of technology transfer in Industry 5.0. The research examined 84 relevant scientific articles published between 2017 and 2025, selected through purposive sampling from five major academic databases: Scopus, Web of Science, Emerald Insight, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. The selection criteria focused on relevance to Industry 5.0 technology transfer, scientific rigor, and accessibility of full texts. The analysis was conducted in two main phases: a quantitative phase employing sophisticated text mining algorithms including Latent Dirichlet Allocation for topic modeling, K-means clustering for concept grouping, and sentiment analysis for understanding technology perceptions, followed by a qualitative phase using Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis methodology. The text mining phase processed over 1.2 million words of text, identifying key concept clusters and relationship patterns. The subsequent thematic analysis involved multiple iterations of coding, theme development, and refinement, starting with 462 initial codes that were refined to 386 unique codes. Validation was ensured through methodological triangulation, parallel coding by independent researchers achieving a Kappa coefficient of 0.83, and expert review by specialists in technology transfer and Industry 5.0. Findings: The research revealed a complex landscape of technology transfer in Industry 5.0, identified through five distinct knowledge clusters and eight key transfer stages. The text mining analysis revealed five primary clusters: advanced technologies (54.4% of content), technology transfer mechanisms (8.5%), Industry 5.0 characteristics (19.2%), challenges and opportunities (11.4%), and policy and regulations (6.6%). Within these clusters, the thematic analysis identified 40 main themes and 163 sub-themes, organized into eight key stages of technology transfer: identification and selection, acquisition, adaptation, absorption and analysis, application and utilization, development and enhancement, dissemination, and learning and innovation. Each stage encompasses specific components and indicators crucial for successful technology transfer in the Industry 5.0 environment. The findings indicate that successful technology transfer in Industry 5.0 requires a holistic approach that integrates technical, organizational, human, and environmental dimensions. The research particularly highlighted the importance of human-centric design principles, sustainability integration methods, and adaptive learning systems in the transfer process. Research limitations/implications: The study encountered several significant limitations that merit careful consideration in interpreting and applying its findings. The emerging nature of Industry 5.0 resulted in a limited availability of empirical studies, potentially affecting the comprehensiveness of the theoretical framework. The reliance on secondary data sources, while allowing for broad coverage of the field, restricted the ability to capture real-time implementation challenges and solutions in industrial settings. The focus on English-language literature may have excluded valuable insights from non-English speaking regions, particularly from countries with advanced industrial policies. Additionally, the rapid evolution of technology and industrial practices means that some findings may require regular updating to maintain relevance. These limitations suggest several important research implications. First, there is a clear need for empirical validation studies to test and refine the proposed framework in various industrial contexts. Second, longitudinal studies tracking the implementation of technology transfer projects in Industry 5.0 environments would provide valuable insights into the framework's practical applicability. Third, cross-cultural comparative analyses could help understand how different cultural and institutional contexts affect technology transfer success in Industry 5.0. The study's limitations also highlight the need for industry-specific adaptation studies and the development of more sophisticated measurement tools for assessing technology transfer effectiveness in human-centric industrial environments. Practical implications: The research provides comprehensive practical implications for multiple stakeholder groups involved in Industry 5.0 technology transfer. For industry managers, the framework offers a structured approach to assessing and selecting appropriate technologies, emphasizing the need to consider both technical capabilities and human factors in implementation decisions. The detailed stages and indicators provide practical guidelines for managing the complex process of technology integration while maintaining focus on human-centric values and sustainability goals. Policy makers can utilize the findings to develop more effective regulatory frameworks that balance technological advancement with social and environmental considerations. The research particularly emphasizes the need for policies that support workforce development, encourage sustainable practices, and promote innovation while protecting human interests. Technology providers can better understand the specific requirements of Industry 5.0 environments and adapt their solutions to meet these needs, particularly in terms of human-machine interaction and sustainable operation. Academic institutions can use the findings to develop more relevant training programs and research initiatives that address the unique challenges of Industry 5.0 technology transfer. The study also provides valuable insights for consultants and technology transfer professionals, offering practical tools for assessing readiness, planning implementations, and measuring success in technology transfer projects. The framework's emphasis on continuous learning and adaptation makes it particularly valuable for organizations transitioning from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0 paradigms. Originality/value: This research makes several significant original contributions to both the theoretical understanding and practical implementation of technology transfer in Industry 5.0. The study is the first to provide a comprehensive framework specifically designed for technology transfer in the Industry 5.0 paradigm, moving beyond traditional linear models to present an ecosystem approach that reflects the complex interplay between human, technological, and environmental factors. The innovative methodological approach, combining sophisticated text mining techniques with detailed thematic analysis, enables a more nuanced understanding of technology transfer complexities than previous studies have achieved. The research introduces novel conceptual elements, particularly in its integration of human-centric design principles with technical transfer requirements, providing a new perspective on how organizations can maintain human primacy while advancing technological capabilities. The framework's practical value lies in its detailed operationalization of abstract concepts into measurable indicators and actionable guidelines, making it immediately useful for practitioners while also advancing theoretical understanding. The study's emphasis on sustainability and human-centricity in technology transfer represents a significant advancement in how we conceptualize and manage technological change in industrial settings. By identifying and analyzing the specific components and relationships that characterize successful technology transfer in Industry 5.0, this research provides both a theoretical foundation for future studies and a practical roadmap for organizations navigating the transition to more advanced, human-centric industrial paradigms. This combination of theoretical advancement and practical applicability makes the study particularly valuable for academics, practitioners, and policy makers working to shape the future of industrial development.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Technology Transfer, Industry 5.0, Advanced Technologies, Digital Transformation

مراجع
Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., Abouhawwash, M., Chakrabortty, R. K., & Ryan, M. J. (2024). Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework to Evaluate the Impact of Industry 5.0 Technologies: Case Study, Lessons Learned, Challenges and Future Directions. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10472-3 Abrash, M. (2021). Creating the future: Augmented reality, the next human-machine interface. IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEDM19574.2021.9720526 Adel, A. (2022). Future of industry 5.0 in society: human-centric solutions, challenges and prospective research areas. Journal of Cloud Computing, 11(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-022-00314-5 Alcaraz, C., Meskini, I. H., & Lopez, J. (2025). Digital twin communities: an approach for secure DT data sharing. International Journal of Information Security, 24(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-024-00912-1 Alkhazaleh, R., Mykoniatis, K., & Alahmer, A. (2022). The success of technology transfer in the Industry 4.0 era: A systematic literature review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040202 Amin, A., Bhuiyan, M.R.I., Hossain, R., Molla, C., Poli, T., & Milon, Md.N. (2024). The adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies by using the technology organizational environment framework: The mediating role to manufacturing performance in a developing country. Business Strategy & Development, 7(2), e363. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.363 Al-qaness, M. A. A., Abd Elaziz, M., Kim, S., Xiong, S., Kwon, H. Y., Ewees, A. A., Cui, X., & Abd El-Wahed, W. F. (2023). Multi-ResAtt: Multilevel Residual Network With Attention for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2022.3165875 Alsamhi, S. H., Brian, O., Adebisi, B., Ali, F. H., & Lee, B. (2022). Computing in the Sky: A Survey on Intelligent Ubiquitous Computing for UAV-Assisted 6G Networks and Industry 4.0/5.0. Drones. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6070177 Alvarez-Aros, E., & Bernal-Torres, C. A. (2021). Technological competitiveness and emerging technologies in industry 4.0 and industry 5.0. Technological competitiveness and emerging technologies. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120191290 Aquilani, B., Piccarozzi, M., Abbate, T., & Codini, A. (2020). The Role of Open Innovation and Value Co-creation in the Challenging Transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0: Toward a Theoretical Framework. Sustainability, 12(21), 8943. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218943 Aslam, F., Aimin, W., Li, M., & Rehman, K. U. (2020). Innovation in the Era of IoT and Industry 5.0: Absolute Innovation Management (AIM) Framework. Information, 11(2), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020124 Ayub Khan, M., Qureshi, M. A., & Khowaja, S. A. (2022). Internet of Things (IoT) Security With Blockchain Technology: A State-of-the-Art Review. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3223370 Aziz, R. A. (2021). Promising Business Opportunities in the Industrial Age 4.0 and the Society Era 5.0 in the New-Normal Period of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Scholarly Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.32474/SJPBS.2021.05.000216 Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2024). Industry 5.0 applications for sustainability: A systematic review and future research directions. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2699 Barata, J., & Kayser, D. (2023). Industry 5.0 – Past, Present, and Near Future. Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.351 Berretta, R., Winter, J. S., & Chakraborty, S. (2023). Defining human-AI teaming the human-centered way: A scoping review and network analysis. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1250725 Bissadu, K., Reddy, Y. V., & Rao, M. B. (2024). Society 5.0 enabled agriculture: Drivers, enabling technologies, architectures, opportunities, and challenges. Information Processing in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2024.04.003 Bocklisch, F., & Huchler, N. (2023). Humans and cyber-physical systems as teammates? Characteristics and applicability of the human-machine-teaming concept in intelligent manufacturing. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1247755 Borchardt, M., Pereira, G. M., Milan, G. S., Scavarda, A. R., Nogueira, E. O., & Poltosi, L. C. (2022). Industry 5.0 beyond technology: an analysis through the lens of business and operations management literature. Organizacija, 55(4), 305-321. https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2022-0020 Botti, A., & Baldi, G. (2024). Business model innovation and Industry 5.0: a possible integration in GLAM institutions. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/ 10.1108 /EJIM-09-2023-0825 Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Terry, G. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications Ltd. Brunzini, A., Papetti, A., Prist, M., Germani, M., & Bevilacqua, M. (2023). Human-centred data-driven redesign of simulation-based training: a qualitative study applied on two use cases of the healthcare and industrial domains. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2023.100505 Bryndin, E. (2020). Formation and management of Industry 5.0 by systems with artificial intelligence and technological singularity. American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 5(2), 24-30. . https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmie.20200502.12 Calp, M. H., & Bütüner, R. (2022). Society 5.0: Effective technology for a smart society. In: Artificial Intelligence and Industry 4.0. Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88468-6.00006-1 Carayannis, E. G., Christodoulou, K., & Christodoulou, A. (2022). Known Unknowns in an Era of Technological and Viral Disruptions—Implications for Theory, Policy, and Practice. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00719-0 Carayannis, E. G., Morawska-Jancelewicz, J., & Grigoroudis, E. (2022). Smart Environments and Techno‑centric and Human‑Centric Innovations for Industry and Society 5.0: A Quintuple Helix Innovation System View Towards Smart, Sustainable, and Inclusive Solutions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00763-4 Carayannis, E. G., & Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2022). The Futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as Driving Forces of Future Universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00854-2 Carayannis, E. G., Draper, J., & Iftimie, I. A. (2021). Towards Fusion Energy in the Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0 Context: Call for a Global Commission for Urgent Action on Fusion Energy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00695-5 Carayannis, E. G., & Morawska, L. (2023). University and education 5.0 for emerging trends, policies and practices in the concept of industry 5.0 and society 5.0. In: Industry 5.0: Creative and Innovative Organizations. Cham: Springer International Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26232-6_1 Carayannis, E. G., Morawska-Jancelewicz, J., & Christodoulou, A. (2023). From the dark side of industry 4.0 to society 5.0: Looking "beyond the box" to developing human-centric innovation ecosystems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2023.3239552 Chen, Y., Zhang, G., Chen, T., & Wang, Y. (2021). A Human-Cyber-Physical System toward Intelligent Wind Turbine Operation and Maintenance. Sustainability, 13(2), 561. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020561 Choi, T. M., Guo, S., & Luo, S. (2022). Disruptive Technologies and Operations Management in the Industry 4.0 Era and Beyond. Production and Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13622 Ciccarelli, C., Lambiase, A., & Maffei, A. (2023). Exploring how new industrial paradigms affect the workforce: A literature review of Operator 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.08.016 Cillo, V., Cerchione, R., Spremic, M., & Garcia-Perez, A. (2022). Rethinking companies' culture through knowledge management lens during Industry 5.0 transition. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2021-0718 Coelho, F., Ferro, R., Costa, N., & Silva, F. J. G. (2023). Industry 5.0: The Arising of a Concept. Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.312 Cunha, L., Andrade, J. M., & Zizic, D. (2022). Exploring the status of the human operator in Industry 4.0: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2022.889129 ElFar, O. A., Hamdy, A., Soliman, N. K., & Hussein, H. S. (2021). Prospects of Industry 5.0 in algae: Customization of production and new advance technology for clean bioenergy generation. Energy Conversion and Management: X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2020.100048 Ellitan, L. (2020). Competing in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Society 5.0. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, dan Entrepreneurship. http://dx.doi.org/10.30588/jmp.v10i1.657 Esmailzadehqamsari, Z., & Rahimi, H. (2023). The effect of perceive quantum management skills on reducing organizational inertia: the mediating role of intellectual capital and organizational learning. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 6(3), 123-148. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2023.1625 [In Persian] Espina-Romero, A., Ruiz-Alba, J. L., Martín-Rojas, R., & Vallejo-Martos, M. C. (2023). Industry 5.0: Tracking Scientific Activity on the Most Influential Industries, Associated Topics, and Future Research Agenda. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065554 Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., & Ratten, V. (2020). Technology transfer, climate change mitigation, and environmental patent impact on sustainability and economic growth: A comparison of European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119770 Foresti, R., Rossi, S., Magnani, M., Lo Bianco, C. G., & Delmonte, N. (2020). Smart Society and Artificial Intelligence: Big Data Scheduling and the Global Standard Method Applied to Smart Maintenance. Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.11.014 Fraga-Lamas, P., Lopes, S. I., & Fernández-Caramés, T. M. (2021). Green IoT and edge AI as key technological enablers for a sustainable digital transition towards a smart circular economy: An industry 5.0 use case. Sensors, 21(17), 5745. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21175745 Fukuda, K. (2020). Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0. International Journal of Production Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.033 Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Mubarak, M. F., Mubarik, M., Rejeb, A., & Nilashi, M. (2022). Identifying industry 5.0 contributions to sustainable development: A strategy roadmap for delivering sustainability values. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33, 716-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.003 Giugliano, D., Laudante, E., & Caputo, F. (2023). Approaches and Technologies for the Human-Centered Industry 5.0. Proyecta, an Industrial Design Journal. https://doi.org/10.25267/P56-IDJ.2023.i3.05 Hao, L. N., Umar, M., Khan, Z., & Ali, W. (2021). How does international technology spillover affect China's carbon emissions? A new perspective through intellectual property protection. Sustainable Production and Consumption. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.008 Hein-Pensel, F., Eichelberger, M., & Fottner, J. (2023). Maturity assessment for Industry 5.0: A review of existing maturity models. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.12.009 Hosseinibamakan, S. M., Soleymanizadeh, H., & Ziaeian, M. (2024). Analyzing the function of metaverse technology in the retention and absorption of knowledge using the integrated approach of interpretive structural modeling and structural equations. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 7(2), 133-164. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2024.1723 [In Persian] Huang, S., Kjellberg, T., & Wang, L. (2022). Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, complementation and co-evolution. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.07.010 Humpert, F., Wiens, M., & Schultmann, F. (2023). Investigating the potential of artificial intelligence for the employee from the perspective of AI-experts. Technology Management, Operations and Decisions. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44282-024-00051-x Iyengar, K. P., Vaishya, R., Jain, V. K., & Ish, P. (2022). Industry 5.0 technology capabilities in Trauma and Orthopaedics. Journal of Orthopaedics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2022.06.001 Jefroy, M., El Mawla, N. K. A., & Trentesaux, D. (2022). Moving from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: What Are the Implications for Smart Logistics? Logistics. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6020026 Kalygina, V. V. (2022). International technology transfer as an effective tool of export-oriented import substitution in Russia. RUDN Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2022-30-2-231-241 Khamseh, A., Farahanifar, F., & Forouzanmehr, M. (2020). Management of Technology Transfer Process. Sarafraz Publications, Karaj. [In Persian] Khan, M., Haleem, A. & Javaid, M. (2023). Changes and improvements in Industry 5.0: A strategic approach to overcome the challenges of Industry 4.0. Green Technologies and Sustainability, 1(2), 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.grets .2023.100020 Khan, S., Huang, M., Hua, Q.-S., Masud, M., & Rahman, A. U. (2023). Secure IoMT for Disease Prediction Empowered With Transfer Learning in Healthcare 5.0, the Concept and Case Study. IEEE Xplore. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3266156 Kiruthiga Devi, M., & Padma Priya, M. (2025). Evolution of next generation networks and its contribution towards industry 5.0. Resource Management in Advanced Wireless Networks, 45-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119827603.ch3 Kolade, O., & Owoseni, A. (2022). Employment 5.0: The work of the future and the future of work. Technology in Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102086 Konno, N., & Schillaci, C. E. (2021). Intellectual capital in Society 5.0 by the lens of the knowledge creation theory. Journal of Intellectual Capital. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-02-2020-0060 Kovaleski, F., Picinin, C. T., & Kovaleski, J. L. (2022). The challenges of technology transfer in the Industry 4.0 era regarding anthropotechnological aspects: A systematic review. SAGE Open, 12(3), 21582440221111104. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221111104 Kovari, A. (2025). A Framework for Integrating Vision Transformers with Digital Twins in Industry 5.0 Context. Machines, 13(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13010036 Kumari, A., Kumar, A., & Tayal, S. (2024). Infrastructure Potential and Human-Centric Strategies in the Context of Industry 5.0. Infrastructure Possibilities and Human-Centered Approaches With Industry 5.0. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2699 Leng, J., Wang, D., Shen, W., Li, X., Liu, Q., & Chen, X. (2022). Industry 5.0: Prospect and retrospect. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.09.017 Leng, J., Liu, Q., Ye, S., Jing, J., Wang, Y., & Zhang, C. (2024). Unlocking the power of industrial artificial intelligence towards Industry 5.0: Insights, pathways, and challenges. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.02.010 Lu, Y., Zhao, C., Xu, X., & Xu, L. (2022). Outlook on human-centric manufacturing towards Industry 5.0. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.02.001 Madhavan, K., Venkatesh, V. G., Mani, V., & Dandage, R. (2022). The Precipitative Effects of Pandemic on Open Innovation of SMEs: A Scientometrics and Systematic Review of Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030152 Mancini, C., & Calvo González, G. (2021). Role of Technology Transfer, Innovation Strategy and Network: A Conceptual Model of Innovation Network to Facilitate the Internationalization Process of SMEs. Technology and Investment. https://doi.org/10.4236/ti.2021.122006 Manteghi, M., Ahmadi, M., & Boushehri, A. R. (2024). Presenting a conceptual model of knowledge sharing and networking of knowledge-based companies in the lithium battery value chain. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 7(3), 87-109. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2024.1769 [In Persian] Martynov, V. V., Shavaleeva, D. N., & Zaytseva, A. A. (2019). Information Technology as the Basis for Transformation into a Digital Society and Industry 5.0. Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITQMIS.2019.8928305 Mauricio, D., & Lopez, X. (2018). A systematic literature review on technology transfer from university to industry. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 12(2), 197-225. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBSR.2018.10010090 Mourtzis, D., Samothrakis, V., Zogopoulos, V., & Palaios, E. (2022). A Literature Review of the Challenges and Opportunities of the Transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176276 Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0—A Human-Centric Solution. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164371 Narvaez Rojas, C., Alomia Peñafiel, G. A., Loaiza Buitrago, D. F., & Tavera Romero, C. A. (2021). Society 5.0: A Japanese Concept for a Superintelligent Society. Sustainability, 13(12), 6567. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126567 Navarro Zapata, J. D., Camacho-Ballesta, J. A., & Nieto-Aleman, P. A. (2024). Determinants of High‑tech Exports: New Evidence from OECD Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01116-z Navarro Zapata, A., Arrazola, M. & de Hevia, J. (2023). Determinants of High-tech Exports: New Evidence from OECD Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01116-z Olsson, A. K., Eriksson, K. M., & Carlsson, L. (2024). Management toward Industry 5.0: a co-workership approach on digital transformation for future innovative manufacturing. European Journal of Innovation Management. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2023-0833 Pang, J., Zheng, P., Fan, J., & Liu, T. (2025). Towards cognition-augmented human-centric assembly: A visual computation perspective. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 91, 102852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102852 Paschek, D., Mocan, A., & Draghici, A. (2019). Industry 5.0 – The Expected Impact of Next Industrial Revolution. Management, Knowledge and Learning. Pereira, A. G., Lima, T. M., & Charrua-Santos, F. (2020). Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0: Opportunities and Threats. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.D8764.018520 Piccarozzi, M., Silvestri, L., Silvestri, C., & Ruggieri, A. (2024). Roadmap to Industry 5.0: Enabling technologies, challenges, and opportunities towards a holistic definition in management studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 205, 123467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123467 Rajesh, R. (2023). Industry 5.0: analyzing the challenges in implementation using grey influence analysis. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2023-0121 Ramírez, T., Mora, H., Pujol, F. A., Maciá-Lillo, A., & Jimeno-Morenilla, A. (2025). Management of heterogeneous AI-based industrial environments by means of federated adaptive-robot learning. European Journal of Innovation Management, 28(1), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2023-0831 Reddy Maddikunta, P. K., Pham, Q. V., Prabadevi, B., Deepa, N., Dev, K., Gadekallu, T. R., Ruby, R., & Liyanage, M. (2022). Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257 Ren, S., Chan, H. K., Zhou, H., & Wang, Z. (2023). Technology transfer adoption to achieve a circular economy model under resource-based view: A high-tech firm. International Journal of Production Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108983 Roblek, V., Meško, M., Bach, M. P., Thorpe, O., & Šprajc, P. (2020). The Interaction between Internet, Sustainable Development, and Emergence of Society 5.0. Data, 5(3), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5030080 Rožanec, J. M., Trajkova, E., Kenda, K., Škrjanc, M., Jordan, M., & Mladenić, D. (2023). Human-centric artificial intelligence architecture for industry 5.0 applications. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2138611 Samadiansari, H., Razavi, M., & Jafari, P. (2024). Developing A Model For Improving The Business Performance Of Nanotechnology Knowledge-Based Companies Based On Technological Learning Modes. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 7(1), 191-226. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2024.1678. [In Persian] Saniuk, S., Grabowska, S., & Gajdzik, B. (2022). Identification of Social and Economic Expectations: Contextual Reasons for the Transformation Process of Industry 4.0 into the Industry 5.0 Concept. Sustainability. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14031391 Santhi, K. R., & Muthuswamy, P. (2023). Industry 5.0 or industry 4.0S? Introduction to industry 4.0 and a peek into the prospective industry 5.0 technologies. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01217-8 Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2019) Research Methods for Business Students. 8th Edition, Pearson, New York. Seyednaghavi, M., Abdollahpour, S., & Ghoreishi, S. M. (2022). Human Resource Management Intelligence Pattern Based on Data Science and Machine Learning. Journal of Business Intelligence Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.22054/IMS.2022.66412.2169 Shahzad, U., Fareed, Z., Shahzad, F., & Shahzad, K. (2022). Investigating the spill overs and connectedness between financial globalization, high-tech industries and environmental footprints: Fresh evidence in context of China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121205 Sigov, A., Andrianova, E., Zhukov, D., & Zykov, S. (2022). Emerging Enabling Technologies for Industry 4.0 and Beyond. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10213-w Simms, C., & Frishammar, J. (2024). Technology transfer challenges in asymmetric alliances between high-technology and low-technology firms. Research Policy, 53(3), and 104937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104937 Skare, M., & Soriano, D. R. (2021). How globalization is changing digital technology adoption: An international perspective. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2021.04.001 Sojoodi, S., & Baghbanpour, F. (2024). The relationship between high-tech industries exports and GDP growth in the selected developing and developed countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01174-3 Tahanpour, S., Araei, V., Azimzadeh Irani, M., & Pourezat, A. (2024). The use of artificial intelligence and knowledge management in improving corporate governance a case study of mapna company. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 7(4), 154-175. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2024.1813. [In Persian] Veeramachaneni, V. (2025). Edge Computing: Architecture, Applications, and Future Challenges in a Decentralized Era. Recent Trends in Computer Graphics and Multimedia Technology, 7(1), 8-23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14166793 Veshkaei-Nejad, S. S., Doustar, M., Malekakhlagh, E., & Yakideh, K. (2024). Design a knowledge-based governance model in executive organizations. Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 7(2), 11-42. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2024.1709 [In Persian] Wang, M., Wang, C. C., Sepasgozar, S., & Zlatanova, S. (2021). BIM Information Integration Based VR Modeling in Digital Twins in Industry 5.0. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2022.100351 Yao, X., Zhou, J., Zhang, C., & Liu, M. (2022). Enhancing wisdom manufacturing as industrial metaverse for industry and society 5.0. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-02027-7 Zamany, P., & Khamseh, A. (2022). Identification of Influential Dimensions and Components of Technology Transfer with a focus on digital transformation. Journal of Technology Development Management. https://doi.org/10.22104/JTDM.2023.5698.3032 [In Persian] Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., & Zhang, G. (2023). Towards new-generation human-centric smart manufacturing in Industry 5.0: A systematic review. Advanced Engineering Informatics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.102121 Zizic, A., Gajic, V., Jeli, Z., & Pjerotic, L. (2022). From Industry 4.0 towards Industry 5.0: A Review and Analysis of Paradigm Shift for the People, Organization and Technology. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15145221
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 92 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 71

اخبار و اعلانات

آمار

طراحی چارچوب مفهومی انتقال فناوری‌های پیشرفته در انقلاب صنعتی پنجم: رویکرد تحلیل مضمون