تعداد نشریات | 38 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,240 |
تعداد مقالات | 8,994 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,847,652 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,707,939 |
تاثیر مهارتهای مدیریت کوانتومی ادراک شده بر کاهش اینرسی سازمانی: نقش میانجی سرمایه فکری و یادگیری سازمانی | ||
مدیریت راهبردی دانش سازمانی | ||
مقاله 4، دوره 6، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 22، مهر 1402، صفحه 123-148 اصل مقاله (796.34 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی با اصالت | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.47176/smok.2023.1625 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
زهرا اسماعیل زاده قمصری1؛ حمید رحیمی* 2 | ||
1کارشناسی ارشد، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه کاشان، کاشان، ایران. | ||
2نویسنده مسئول: دانشیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه کاشان، کاشان، ایران. | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 20 خرداد 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 11 تیر 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 19 تیر 1402 | ||
چکیده | ||
تحقق رشد و توسعه پایدار دانشگاه ها و موسسات آموزش عالی میتواند به کمک مهارت های مدیریت کوانتومی، یادگیری سازمانی و سرمایه فکری در دانشگاه ها ایجاد گردد. زیرا دانشگاهها، مکان هایی برای تولید، سازماندهی و انتقال دانشاند که در این فرایند نقش کارکنان به عنوان سرمایههای فکری و انسانی، مشهود و حیاتی است. بر همین اساس، هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی تاثیر مهارتهای مدیریت کوانتومی ادراک شده بر کاهش اینرسی سازمانی با نقش میانجی سرمایه فکری و یادگیری سازمانی بود. نوع پژوهش، توصیفی- همبستگی و جامعه آماری شامل کارکنان دانشگاه کاشان بود که از میان آنها و از طریق جدول مورگان 150 نفر به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش، چهار پرسشنامه مهارتهای مدیریت کوانتومی، اینرسی سازمانی، سرمایه فکری و یادگیری سازمانی بود. پایایی پرسشنامهها از طریق ضریب آلفای کرونباخ برای مهارت کوانتومی 70/0، اینرسی سازمانی 75/0، سرمایه فکری 87/0 و یادگیری سازمانی 90/0 برآورد شد. تحلیل دادهها در سطح توصیفی و استنباطی با استفاده از نرم افزارهای آماری SPSS و اسمارت پی ال اس انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد میانگین متغیرهای مهارت های کوانتومی، سرمایه فکری و یادگیری سازمانی، بالاتر از نمره ملاک و میانگین اینرسی سازمانی، پایین تر از نمره ملاک بود. ضرایب مسیر نشان داد سرمایه فکری با (51/0-=Beta)، مهارت کوانتومی با (26/0-=Beta) و یادگیری سازمانی با (50/0-=Beta) روی اینرسی سازمانی، تاثیر منفی و معنادار دارد. مهارت کوانتومی با (42/0=Beta) روی سرمایه فکری و با (45/0=Beta) روی یادگیری سازمانی تاثیر مثبت و معنادار دارد. به علاوه نقش میانجی یادگیری سازمانی و سرمایه فکری در تاثیر مهارت های کوانتومی در کاهش اینرسی سازمانی، تایید شد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
مهارتهای مدیریت کوانتومی؛ اینرسی سازمانی؛ سرمایه فکری؛ یادگیری سازمانی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
The effect of perceive quantum management skills on reducing organizational inertia: the mediating role of intellectual capital and organizational learning | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Zahra Esmailzadehqamsari1؛ Hamid Rahimi2 | ||
1Master's degree, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Kashan University, Kashan, Iran. | ||
2Corresponding author: Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Kashan University, Kashan, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The realization of sustainable growth and development of universities and higher education institutions can be created with the help of quantum management skills, organizational learning and intellectual capital in universities. Because universities are places for producing, organizing and transferring knowledge, that in this process the role of employees as intellectual and human capital is evident and vital. Based on this, the aim of this research was to investigate the effect of perceived quantum management skills on reducing organizational inertia with the mediating role of intellectual capital and organizational learning. The type of research was descriptive-correlation and the statistical population included employees at University of Kashan that by using Morgan's table 150 people were selected as a sample. The research tools were four questionnaires of quantum management skills, organizational inertia, intellectual capital & organizational learning. The reliability of questionnaires was estimated through Cronbach's alpha coefficient for quantum skill 0.70, organizational inertia 0.75, intellectual capital 0.87 and organizational learning 0.90. Data analysis was done at the descriptive and inferential level by using SPSS and Smart PLS statistical software. The results showed that the mean of the variables of quantum skills, intellectual capital and organizational learning was higher than the criterion score and the mean of organizational inertia was lower than the criterion score. Path coefficients showed that intellectual capital with (Beta=-0.51), quantum skills with (Beta=-0.26) and organizational learning with (Beta=-0.50) on organizational inertia has a negative & significant effect. Quantum skill with (Beta=0.42) on intellectual capital and with (Beta=0.45) on organizational learning has a positive & significant effect. In addition, the mediating role of organizational learning and intellectual capital in the effect of quantum skills in reducing organizational inertia was confirmed. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Quantum Management Skills, Organizational Inertia, Intellectual Capital, Organizational Learning | ||
مراجع | ||
AlKayid, K., Selem, K. M., Shehata, A. E., & Tan, C. C. (2022). Leader vision, organizational inertia and service hotel employee creativity: role of knowledge-donating. Curr. Psychol. 1–13. Alvino, F., Di Vaio, A., Hassan, R. & Palladino, R. (2021). Intellectual capital and sustainable development: a systematic literature review, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22, 1; 76-94. Azimi Sanavi, B. & Razavi, M. H. (2015). The relationship between understanding and application of management quantum skills in Sports Organizations. Sport Management Journal, 6(4): 613-625. (In Persian). Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital; an exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36; 63-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251749810204142 Bontis, N. & Girardi, J. (2000). Teaching knowledge management and intellectual capital lessons: an empirical examination of the Tango simulation, International Journal of Technology Management, 27, 5; 545-55. Cai, W., Vossogh, M., Reinders, B., Toshin, D. S. & Ebadi, A. G. (2019). Application of quantum artificial bee colony for energy management by considering the heat and cooling storages. Applied Thermal Engineering, 157; 1137-1342. Cui, F.; Lim, H.; Song, J. (2022). The influence of leadership dtyle in China SMEs on enterprise innovation performance: The mediating roles of organizational learning. Sustainability, 14; 3249. Dargahi, H., Partovi Shayan, Z., Razghandi, A. & Morravegi, M. (2017). Quantum management and toxic management; a systematic review in clinical laboratory system. Journal of Laboratory and Diagnosis, 8(31): 29-45. (In Persian). Derrick, J. (2019). Learning, innovation and ‘tacit pedagogy ‘in workplace practice: a comparison of two high-performing organizations in different sectors, Doctoral Dissertation, UCL (University College London). DiBella, A. J., Nevis, E. C. & Gould, J. M. (1996). Understanding organizational learning capability. Journal of Management Studies, 33(3); 361-379. Ebrahimi, S. A. (2016). An introduction to organizational inertia and effective factors on it in organizations of public sector of Iran. Public Organizations Management, 4(1): 91-108. (In Persian). Edgley-Pyshorn, C., & Huisman, J. (2011). The role of the HR department in organizational change in a British university. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(5); 610-625. Elliott, I. C. (2020). Organizational learning and change in a public sector context. Teaching Public Administration, 38(3); 270–283. Fris, J. & Lazaridou, A. (2006). An additional way of thinking about organizational life and leadership: the quantum perspective. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 48(5): 29-34. Ghaffari, H., Shaili, M., Ahang, F., Raisi, A. & Shahikitash, M. (2019). The effect of quantum leadership on organizational learning with the mediating role of knowledge sharing (research sample, Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 2(5): 119-146. (In Persian). Ghanbari, S. & Moradi, A. (2017). The relationship between quantum management skills in managers and employees ready for organizational change, Educational Leadership & Administration, 11(3): 87-109. (In Persian). Godkin, L., & Allcorn, S. (2008). Overcoming organizational inertia: a tripartite model for achieving strategic organizational change. J. Appl. Bus. Econ. 8; 82–94. Gomez, J. P., Cespedes, L., Valle, J., & Carberea, R. (2005). Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement. Journal of Bushiness Research, 58; 715-725. Haag, S. (2014). Organizational inertia as barrier to firms’ IT adoption–multidimensional scale development and validation. Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah. Hajizade, P., & Sardari, A. (2018). The impact of knowledge management on organizational innovative performance with emphasis on mediating role of organizational learning case study: Qaed Basir Petrochemical Products Manufacture Holding. Scientific Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 1(2); 63-93. (In Persian). Hedberg, B. & Wolff, R. (2003). Organizing, learning, and strategizing: From construction to discovery. In Meinolf Dierkes, Ariane Berthoin Antal, John Child, & Ikujiro Nonaka. (Eds.). Handbook of organizational Learning & Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, (535-556). Hong, K. S., Songan, P., Usop, H. H., Gan, S. L., Shim, G. T. G., Mustafa, R.,… & Law, L. (2013). Leadership behaviors, university culture and leadership effectiveness for academic work in Malaysian public universities. Educational Leadership and Leadership Education in Asia, 2(1); 281-289. Jamalirovesht, S. & Radmard, S. (2020). Monitoring the role of cybernetic management functions in preventing organizational inertia, with emphasis on the role of mediating knowledge sharing among employees of Tax Affairs Organization of East Azerbaijan Province. Public Organizations Management, 8(4): 25-42. (In Persian). Jui-Chan, H., Lu, C., Hao-Ming, W., Ching-Tang, H., & Hui-Wen, W. (2020). The study of organizational inertia, business model innovation and organizational performance in Taiwan Financial Institutions: Organizational Learning Perspective. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 29(5); 104. Jansen, J. (2015). Leading for change: Race, intimacy and leadership on divided university campuses. New York, NY: Routledge. Javadi, S. M., Alvedari, H., Amirkhani, A. H. & Jamshidi, A. (2017). Presenting the model of organizational inertia in University. Public Organizations Management, 5((20)4): 39-48. (In Persian). Joshi, M., Cahill, D., Sidhu, J. & Kansal, M. (2013). Intellectual capital and financial performance: an evaluation of the Australian financial sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14, 2; 264-285. Jung, K. B., Kang, S.-W., & Choi, S. B. (2020). Empowering leadership, risk-taking behavior, and employees’ commitment to organizational change: the mediated moderating role of task complexity. Sustainability, 12: 2340. Jung, K.B.; Ullah, S.M.E.; Choi, S.B. (2021). The mediated moderating role of organizational learning culture in the relationships among authentic leadership, leader-member exchange, and employees’ innovative behavior. Sustainability, 13; 10802. Kim, M. S., & Koo, D.W. (2017). Linking LMX, engagement, innovative behavior, and job performance in hotel employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(12); 3044–3062. Kundu, S. C., Kumar, S., & Gahlawat, N. (2019). Empowering leadership and job performance: mediating role of psychological empowerment. Manag. Res. Rev. 42, 605–624. doi: 10.1108/mrr-04-2018-0183 Laszlo C. (2020). Quantum management: the practices and science of flourishing enterprise. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion. 17(4): 15-301. Li, Y. Song., Y. Wang, J., & Li, C. (2019). Intellectual capital, knowledge sharing, and innovation performance: Evidence from the Chinese Construction Industry. Sustainability, 11(9); 2713. Liao, S-H., Fei, W-C., & Liu, C-T. (2008). Relationships between knowledge inertia, organizational learning and organization innovation. Technovation, 28 (4); 183-195. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.11.005 Liu, C.H., Gan, B., Luo, B.N. & Zhang, Y. (2017). Clarifying the effect of organization learning on service innovation: the mediating role of intellectual capital. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-28. Lorinkova, N. M., & Perry, S. J. (2017). When is empowerment effective? The role of leader-leader exchange in empowering leadership, cynicism, and time theft. J. Manag. 43; 1631–1654. Luu, T. T. (2021). Knowledge sharing in the hospitality context: The roles of leader humility, job crafting, and promotion focus. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102848. Mikalef, P., Van de Wetering, R. & Krogstie, J. (2019). Big data enabled organizational transformation: the effect of inertia in adoption and diffusion. Conference: 21st International Conference on Business Information Systems At: Berlin, Germany. Mirkamali, M. & Hajkhozeymh, M. (2020). Investigate the relationship between managers' quantum management skills and staff readiness for organizational change. Journal of Research on Management of Teaching in Marine Sciences, 6(4); 19-34. (In Persian). Mokhtari, A. H., Akbari Mahallekolaee, M., & Bagheri, R. (2018). Change readiness and organizational learning (case of study: Tehran Municipality). Scientific Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 1(1): 169-187. (In Persian). Murray, P. & Donegan, K. (2003). Empirical linkages between firm competencies and organizational learning. The Learning Organization, 10(1); 51–62. Najafi, A., Rahimian, H., & Bashkouh, A. (2016). Survey of relationships between learning culture and motivation with readiness for organizational change in Iran National Petrochemical Industry Companies. Transformation Management Journal, 8(16); 114-139. (In Persian). O'Connor, A., Roos, G. & Vickers-Willis, T. (2007). Evaluating an Australian public policy organization's innovation capacity”. European Journal of Innovation Management. 10(4): 58-532. Park, S., & Kim, E.-J. (2018). Fostering organizational learning through leadership and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(6); 1408–1423. Rafsanjani, A., Ghorbani, M., & Fariborzi, E. (2023). Investigating the impact of intellectual capital on innovation in education organization. Transformation Management Journal, 14(28), 205-228. (In Persian). Rahimi, H., Athari, Z., & Aflakian, N. (2015). Intellectual capital and knowledge management process in quantum organization: University of Kashan case. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 21(4): 99-119. (In Persian). Ramirez, Y. (2014). The relevance of intellectual capital: An analysis of Spanish Universities. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 8, 5; 53-65. Salimi, M. H., Rajaeepour, S., Siyadat, S. A. & Bidram, H. (2018). The relation between quantum management skills and organizational agility capabilities with the mediating role of organizational intelligence in the selected State-universities of Isfahan. Public Management Researches, 9(33): 113-138. (In Persian). Sillic, M. (2019). Critical impact of organizational and individual inertia in explaining non-compliant security behavior in the shadow IT context. Comput. Secur. 80, 108–119. Shahabi, M. & Jalilian, H. (2011). Investigating the relationship between knowledge inertia, organizational learning and organizational innovation, Management and Human Resources Research Quarterly in the Oil Industry, 4 (15): 137-158. (In Persian). Shehabat, İ., Mahdı, S. A. & Khoualdı, K. (2008). E-learning as a knowledge management approach Shelton, C. K. & Darling, J. R. (2001). The quantum skills model in management: A new paradigm to enhance effective leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22(6); 264-273. Sobhaninejad, M. (2006). The learning organization (First Edition). Tehran: Yastron Publications. (In Persian). Steven, Tam., David, E Gray. (2016). Organizational learning and the organizational life cycle: The differential aspects of an integrated relationship in SMEs, European Journal of Training and Development, 40, 1: 2-20. Stewart, T. A. (2001). The wealth of knowledge: Intellectual capital and the twenty-first century organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency. Stieglitz, N., Knudsen, T., & Becker, M. C. (2016). Adaptation and inertia in dynamic environments, Strategic Management Journal, 37(9); 1854-1864. Suddaby, R., & Foster, W. M. (2017). History and organizational change. Journal of Management, 43(1); 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675031 Thuan, L. C., & Thanh, B. T. (2020). Leader knowledge sharing behavior and follower creativity: The role of follower acquired knowledge and prosocial motivation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 32(6), 457–471. Tulubas, T. & Celep, C. (2007). Effect of perceived procedural justice on faculty members silence the mediating role of trust in supervisor, Procedia -Social Behavioral Science, 34 (12); 1221-1231. Vaezi, R., Adnan Raad, A. & Shahmohammadi, M. (2015). An attitude towards change from the perspective of Islamic teachings and its relationship with employees' readiness for change. Organizational Behaviour Studies Quarterly, 3(8): 1-30. (In Persian). Xu, J. & Wang, B. (2018). Intellectual capital, financial performance and companies' sustainable growth: evidence from the Korean manufacturing industry, Sustainability, 10; 12; 46-51. Zhang P, He-ming F, Shu-yin L. (2017). Research on the relationship between organizational inertia and ambidextrous technological innovation: the influence of network position. China: International Conference on Education Innovation and Economic Management. Pp. 178-190. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 357 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 269 |