آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 36 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,192 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,579 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 6,988,716 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,032,570 |
بررسی عوامل فرهنگی و روانی-اجتماعی مرتبط با تحکیم بنیان خانواده از منظر کارشناسان دادگستری و انتظامی | ||
| روانشناسی نظامی | ||
| دوره 15، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 57، اردیبهشت 1403، صفحه 165-187 اصل مقاله (931.1 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| رقیه عباسی1؛ ربابه پورجبلی* 2؛ خدیجه ذوالقدر2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری جامعه شناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران، ایران، | ||
| 2استادیار گروه علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد زنجان، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 02 بهمن 1401، تاریخ بازنگری: 19 بهمن 1401، تاریخ پذیرش: 09 اردیبهشت 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| از منظر جامعه‌شناسی، خانواده اساسی‌ترین نهاد اجتماعی است که در شکل‌گیری ساختار کلان جامعه و افزایش بهره-وری آن نقش بسزا دارد. میان خانواده و جامعه یک رابطه دو سویه برقرار است و هر کدام بر دیگری تأثیر می‌گذارد. جامعه‌شناسان شکل‌گیری و ساخت شخصیت فرد در خانواده را متأثر از فرهنگ‌پذیری و جامعه‌پذیری می‌دانند و بیان می‌کنند که «از مهم‌ترین نتایج جامعه‌پذیری، ایجاد شخصیّت فردی و الگوهای نسبتاً ثابت فکر، احساس و عمل است که همگی ویژگی‌های یک فرد محسوب می‌شوند» (یان. رابرتسون، 1374: 112). از این‌رو اهمیّت پرداختن به موضوع «تحکیم خانواده» ریشه در اهمیّت نهاد خانواده دارد. نهاد مقدس خانواده، رکن بنیادین اجتماع بشری و محمل فرهنگ‌های گوناگون است تا آنجا که سعادت و شقاوت امّت‌ها، مرهون رشادت و ضلالت خانواده می‌باشد. اولین شرط داشتن جامعه‌ای سالم و پویا، سلامت و پایداری خانواده است. همه دستاوردهای علمی و هنری بشر در سایه خانواده‌های سالم و امن پدید آمده است. از این‌رو اندیشمندان علوم انسانی در رشته‌های تخصصی خود، با رویکردهای گوناگون، به مسائل خانواده پرداخته‌اند و عوامل ایجادکننده را از منظر تحلیلی خاص، تبیین نمودند. هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی عوامل فرهنگی و روانی-اجتماعی مرتبط با تحکیم بنیان خانواده از منظر کارشناسان دادگاه خانواده و مشاوران نیروی انتظامی شهرستان زنجان بود که از طریق پرسشنامه با تکنیک دلفی و مصاحبه عمیق با نمونه‌گیری نیمه ساختاریافته، و نیز با جمع‌آوری اطلاعات کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی انجام گرفت. نتایج یافته‌ها حاکی از آن است که: از نظر کارشناسان عوامل‌فرهنگی اولویت اول را نسبت به عوامل‌اجتماعی در تحکیم بنیان خانواده داراست. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تحکیم بنیان خانواده؛ عوامل‌فرهنگی؛ عوامل روانی-اجتماعی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Cultural and psycho-social factors related to the consolidation of the family foundation | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| roghaieh Abbasi1؛ rbabeh pourjabali2؛ Khadijeh zolghadr2 | ||
| 1Doctoral student of Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Department, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan Branch, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| From a sociological point of view, the family is the most basic social institution that plays a significant role in shaping the macro structure of society and increasing its productivity. They know adaptability and state that "one of the most important results of socialization is the creation of individual personality and relatively fixed patterns of thought, feeling and action, which are all the characteristics of a person". Therefore, the importance of addressing the issue of "family consolidation" is rooted in the importance of the family institution. The sacred institution of the family is the fundamental pillar of human society and the bearer of various cultures, to the extent that the prosperity and misfortune of nations depends on the wisdom and error of the family. Therefore, thinkers of human sciences have addressed family issues in their specialized fields with different approaches and explained the factors that create them from a specific analytical perspective. The aim of the present study was to investigate the cultural and psycho-social factors related to the consolidation of the family foundation from the perspective of family court experts and police force advisors of Zanjan city, through a questionnaire with the Delphi technique and in-depth interviews with semi-structured sampling, as well as with Collection of library and field information was done. The results of the findings indicate that: according to experts, cultural factors have the first priority over social factors in strengthening the family foundation. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| family foundation consolidation, cultural factors, psycho-social factors | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Azad Aramaki T. (1386-89). Sociology of Iranian family. Tehran: Organization for Studying and Compiling Humanities Books of Universities (Samt).
Azazi SH. (1376). Family sociology. Emphasizing the role. The structure and function of the family in the contemporary era. Tehran. Enlightenment Publications and Women's Studies. Print 6.
Bastaits K, Pasteels I, Mortelmans D. (2018).How do post-divorce paternal and maternal family trajectories relate to adolescents' subjective well-being Journal of Adolescence, 64, 98-108.
Bernards. J. (1384). An introduction to family studies. Translation: Hossein Qazian. Tehran. Ney published.
Buick Mohammadi Z. (1375). Semantic ethnography of a key word of healthy society. Number 29
Dehkhoda A.A. (1377-80). dictionary Tehran. University of Tehran Publishing and Printing Institute. Edition 2 and 18.
Durkheim A. (1381). About the division of social work. Translation: Bagher Parham. Tehran. Publications Center.
Epstein, N. B. & D.s. Bishop. (1981). “Problem- centred systems therapy of the family”, in Gurman and Kniskern (eds).
Fasihi, A. (1389). Examining the effectiveness of functionalism theory. Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. Year 1. Number 2. pp. 109-131.
Fukuyam, F. (1999). “The Great Disruption: Human nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order, New York: Free Press.
Gairdner, W. (1992). “the War against the Family”. by Paul Crouser. Reviewed. By D. Stoddart Publishing Company Ltd.
Goode, William J. (1989). “The family, Prentice-Hall of India”.
Gottman, J. M. (1993). “The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology”, 61 (1), 6–15.
Gottman, J. M. (1994). “What predicts divorce: The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes”. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hajian Moghadam F, & at el. (1395-96). Designing a strong family model. The subject of the vision document of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the horizon of 1404 AH. Woman and family. pp. 879-902.
Hajian Moghadam F. (2013). Meta-analysis of family studies in the field of the factors that make up and the erosive factors of the Iranian family. Research journal of women. 5(1): 1-39
Hetherington, E. M, Cox, M. & Cox, R. (1997). “The Development of Children in Mother Headed Families”. In H. Hoffman & D. Reiss (Eds). The American Family: Dying and Developing New York: Plenum.
Jensen, A. M. (1994). “The Feminization of Childhood”, in J. Keller & et al (1994). Sociology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Khanifar H. (1387). Family pathology. Tehran. University of Applied Sciences Publications.
Khatibi, A. (2014). Comparison of gender attitudes towards the factors affecting the consolidation of the family foundation. Women and Family Educational Cultural Quarterly, 10(33): 114-89.
Khatibi, A. (2017). Measuring the impact of compatibility components on family consolidation. Educational culture of women and family, 12(42), 7-31.
Khodadust, S., & Ebrahimi Moghadam, H. (2020). Effectiveness of Olson circumplex model training on attachment styles and marital conflicts in couples exposed emotional divorce. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy, 9(2), 53-72.
Khodadust, S., & Ebrahimi Moghadam, H. (2020). Effectiveness of Olson circumplex model training on attachment styles and marital conflicts in couples exposed emotional divorce. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy, 9(2), 53-72.
Parson T. B. (1995). “Socialization&intraction process”, the free press.
Ritzer ,George. (1988). “Sociological Theory”, singapor
Ritzer. J. (1380). Sociological theories in the contemporary era. Translation: Mohsen Talasi, Tehran. Scientific publications.
Robertson. Y. (1374). An introduction to sociology. Hossein Behrvan Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi Publishing House.
Rosenbaum. H. (1367). Family as a structure against society. Tehran. Translation: Mohammad Sadeq Mahdavi. University Publication Center. First Edition
Sarukhani, B. (1376-70). An introduction to family sociology. Tehran. Soroush Publications.
Sarukhani, B. (1381). Female. Power and family. Quarterly Journal of Women in Development and Politics. (Vol. 12): 29-50
Segalen. Martin. (88 and 1370-75). Historical sociology of the family. Translation: Hamid Eliasi. Tehran. Center publication.
Statistical Yearbook of Zanjan Province . (2015). Management and planning organization of Zanjan province. Deputy of statistics and information.
Taghavi N. (1374). Sociology of family. Tehran. Payam Noor Publications. 1376 Sh
Tanhaei H, Shukarbeigi. A. (1387). Globalization. Modernism and family in Iran (transition or collapse). Sociology Quarterly. (Vol. 10): 33-56.
Tanhaei H. (1383). An introduction to sociological schools and theories. Marandiz publication. Mashhad.
Tavasoli GH. (1376). Sociological theories. Tehran. Side Publications. Eighth edition.
Turner, Jonathan H. (1988). “The Structure of Sociological Theory”. Wads Worth Publishing Co. New York.
Wallace, Ruth A. & Wolf, A. (1991). “Contemporary Sociology Theory”. Prentice-Hall, New York.
Winter, I. (ed) (2000). Social Capital and Public Policy in Australia, Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Zaran, M. CHaboki, O. (1393). Family health from a sociological point of view. Quarterly Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy Culture. 5(20): 141-163 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 95 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 88 |
||