اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 38 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,244 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,010 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,867,135 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,718,981 |
شناسایی پیشایندهای مدیریت حکمت در سازمانها با بهرهگیری از روش نقشه شناختی فازی | ||
| مدیریت راهبردی دانش سازمانی | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 7، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 26، مهر 1403، صفحه 55-66 اصل مقاله (1.72 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی با اصالت | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.47176/smok.2024.1755 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محسن عارف نژاد* 1؛ سیده مریم موسوی زاده2؛ رضوان منتی3 | ||
| 1دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری گروه مدیریت، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران | ||
| 3دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: جایگاه عقل در مدیریت و بررسی زمینههای بهرهمندی از آن یکی از مسائلی است که امروزه به آن توجه بسیاری شده است. در این راستا، مدیریت حکمت رویکردی است که به بهرهگیری از دانش، تجربیات و درک درست در فرآیند تصمیمگیری و مدیریت تأکید دارد. این مدل مدیریت با ارتقا فهم عمیق و اثربخشی در تصمیمگیریها، بهمنظور دستیابی موفق به اهداف سازمانی موثر میباشد. لذا پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی پیشایندهای مدیریت حکمت در سازمانها انجام پذیرفت. روش پژوهش: این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و از حیث نحوه گردآوری دادهها پیمایشی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر خبرگان متشکل از اساتید مدیریت دانشگاههای استان لرستان میباشند، که از میان آنها 30 نفر به عنوان اعضای نمونه با روش نمونهگیری هدفمند و بر اساس اصل اشباع نظری انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری داده در بخش کیفی پژوهش، مصاحبه و در بخش کمی پرسشنامه است. بهمنظور تحلیل دادهها در بخش کیفی از رویکرد تحلیل محتوا و با بهرهگیری از نرم افزار اتلستی و در بخش کمی از روش نقشه شناختی فازی استفاده شده است. روایی و پایایی مصاحبه پژوهش با استفاده از روش روایی محتوایی و روایی نظری و پایایی درون کدگذار میان کدگذار تایید شد. همچنین روایی و پایایی پرسشنامه پژوهش با روایی محتوایی و بازآزمون سنجیده شد. یافته‌ها: یافتههای پژوهش نشان داد که مهمترین پیشایندهای مدیریت حکمت در سازمانها، داشتن مهارت انسانی-ادراکی با شاخص مرکزی (45/26)، ارتقا براساس شایستگی با شاخص مرکزی (27/26)، توانایی حل مسئله (57/25)، دانش و تجربهی مدیر (56/25)، توانش یادگیری قوی (44/25) و عدم وابستگی به منابع قدرت با شاخص مرکزی (09/25) میباشند. نتیجه‌گیری: پیشایندهای مدیریت حکمت در سازمانها، عبارت‌اند از: توانش یادگیری قوی، ارتقا بر اساس شایستگی، سالم‌بودن، انتقادپذیر بودن، قضاوت‌نکردن بر اساس شنیدههای دیگران، داشتن روحیه مشورت، داشتن مهارت انسانی - ادراکی، توانایی حل مسئله، توانایی تصمیمگیری منطقی بر اساس مستندات، عدم وابستگی به منابع قدرت، فرهنگ‌سازمانی، توانمندی در تجزیه‌وتحلیل وضعیت، دانش و تجربة مدیر، شرایط بازار، کارکرد هوشمندانه، توانایی تعامل اجتماعی، توانایی سازماندهی و مدیریت زمان، مدیریت استرس، داشتن هوش تصمیمی و مسئولیت‌پذیری. یافتههای بخش کمی نیز بیانگر اولویت این پیشایندها است. اصالت/ارزش: سازمانها میبایست در مراحل اولیه گزینش و استخدام، توجه خود را به تواناییها و ویژگیهای شخصیتی افراد معطوف نموده تا بتوانند زمینة پیادهسازی مدیریت حکمت را در سازمان ایجاد کنند و در مراحل بعد به تقویت این مهارتها بپردازند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| مدیریت؛ مدیریت خرد؛ دانش و خرد؛ مدیریت حکمت-محور | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Identifying the antecedents of wisdom management in organizations using the fuzzy cognitive map method | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohsen Arefnezhad1؛ Seyedeh Maryam Mousavi Zadeh2؛ Rezvan Mennati3 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran | ||
| 2Doctoral student of the Department of Management, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran | ||
| 3PhD student in public administration, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Purpose: The position of reason in management and the study of its utilization is one of the issues that has received much attention today. In this regard, wisdom management is an approach that emphasizes the use of knowledge, experiences, and correct understanding in the decision-making and management process. This management model effectively promotes deep learning and decision-making effectiveness to achieve organizational goals successfully. Therefore, the present study was conducted to identify the antecedents of wisdom management in organizations. Methodology: This study is applied in terms of purpose and survey in terms of data collection. The statistical population of the present study consists of management professors from universities in Lorestan province, from whom 30 people were selected as sample members using purposive sampling based on the principle of theoretical saturation. The data collection tool is used in the qualitative part of the research interviews, and a questionnaire is used in the quantitative part. The content analysis approach was used to analyze the data in the qualitative part using Atlas software. In the quantitative part, the fuzzy cognitive mapping method was used. The validity and reliability of the research interview were confirmed using the content validity method, theoretical validity, and intra-coder and inter-coder reliability. The validity and reliability of the research questionnaire were also measured using content validity and test-retests. Findings: The research findings showed that the most important antecedents of wisdom management in organizations are having human-cognitive skills with a central index (26.45), promotion based on competence with a central index (26.27), problem-solving ability (25.57), knowledge and experience of the manager (25.56), strong learning ability (25.44), and independence from sources of power with a central index (25.09). Research limitations: Regarding the limitations of the present study, it should be noted that the most critical limitations of this study include the novelty of its subject and the lack of relevant study resources in this field both inside and outside the country. The lack of resources to compare the results makes the generalizability of the results difficult. Also, the lack of other tools to collect data due to the lack of relevant study resources, a management background, and being thoroughly familiar with different management forms can be considered a limitation. To ensure greater accuracy and precision in the results, experts with a management background and who are thoroughly familiar with different management forms should also be used as sample members, which resulted in a limitation in the number of samples. Originality/value: According to the research results, organizations should focus on individuals' abilities and personality traits in the early stages of selection and recruitment to create the basis for implementing wisdom management in the organization and strengthen these skills in later stages. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Management, wisdom management, knowledge and wisdom, wisdom-oriented management | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abaspoor, E., Albonaimi, I., & mohammad, H. (2024). Designing a marketing knowledge policy package in free trade zones based on the tacit knowledge of experts using (research example: Arvand Free Trade Zone). Scientific Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 7(1), 153-186. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2024.1643 (In Persian) Barman, A., & Choudhury, S. R. (2015). Economic and Organisational Wisdom for Asian Century. Postmodern Openings, (1): pp. 11-34. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/2015.0601.01 Bratianu, C., & Bejinaru, R. (2023). Wisdom Management: A Semantic Analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 17(1), 1167-1178. http://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2023-0105 Danai Fard, H., Rajabzadeh, A., & Salari, A.M. (2009). Beyond managerial knowledge and experience: an analysis of the formative elements of managerial wisdom from the point of view of Naja managers. Police management research. 5(3), 396-417. (In Persian) Davali, M. M., & Karimifard, A. (2023). Identifying and prioritizing the antecedents of lack of knowledge sharing among the employees of Rafsanjan Industrial Complex. Scientific Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 6(2), 141-182. (In Persian) Hammond, M., Clapp-Smith, R., & Palanski, M. (2017). Beyond (just) the workplace: A theory of leader development across multiple domains. Academy of Management Review, 42(3), 481-498. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2023.1581 Hasani Moghadam, S., Sasan, Z., Soltani, M., & Nowrozi, R. (2021). The design of wisdom-oriented command and management model in the school of Haj Qasim, based on the analysis of Imam Khamenei's speech. Series of international conferences on the second step of the Islamic revolution, 2 (selected articles of the second international conference on the second step of the revolution), 1-29. (In Persian) Jakubik, M. (2023). Evolution of knowledge management towards wisdom management. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 22(06), 2350051. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021964922350051X Jakubik, M., & Müürsepp, P. (2022). From knowledge to wisdom: will wisdom management replace knowledge management?. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 31(3), 367-389. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2021-0219 Jennex, M. (2018). Re-Examining the Jennex Olfman Knowledge Management Success Model. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Karami, S., Ghahremani, M., Parra-Martinez, F.A. and Gentry, M. (2020), “A polyhedron model of wisdom: a systematic review of the wisdom studies in psychology, management and leadership, and education”, Roeper Review, 42(4), 241-257. Kikha, A. (2021). The role of wisdom-oriented leadership on the public service motivation of employees with the mediation of leader-follower exchange variables and organization identification. Public Management Research, 14(51), 225-252. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2021.37805.5414 (In Persian) Lapuente, P. (2023). Do not do in order to be able to do: Wisdom in policy, management and practice. Atencion Primaria, 55(7), 102646-102646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2023.102646 Mitroff, I. I. (2016). Wisdom: How the Leaders of Purpose-Driven Organizations Manage from Their Values. In Combatting Disruptive Change. Palgrave Macmillan US. 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60044-8_5 Moradi, M. (2014). Presenting a wisdom-based organization model in government departments. Public Administration, 7(1), 185-209. (In Persian) Moradi, M., & Zandipak, R. (2019). Wisdom-oriented management style and the structures and paths to achieve it and its relationship with transformational leadership (case study: five-star hotels in Tehran). Tourism Social Studies, 8(16), 27-58. (In Persian) Murtaza, G., Abbas, M., Raja, U., Roques, O., Khalid, A., & Mushtaq, R. (2016). Impact of Islamic work ethics on organizational citizenship behaviors and knowledge-sharing behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(2): pp. 325-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.013 Nonaka, I., Chia, R., Holt, R., & Peltokorpi, V. (2014). Wisdom, management and organization. Management Learning, 45(4), 365-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507614542901 Naowakhoaksorn, P., & Suwannarat, Peker, S., İnandı, Y., & Gılıç, F. (2018). The relationship between leadership styles (autocratic and democratic) of school administrators and the mobbing teachers suffer. European Journal of Contemporary Education. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2018.1.150 Pinheiro, P., & Rocha, R. (2020, December). Knowledge sharing: a link between organizational wisdom and organizational spirituality. In European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 639-XXII). Academic Conferences International Limited. https://doi.org/10.34190/EKM.20.131 Ranjbarian, B,. Alame, M,. Rashid, K., & Gholami Karin, M. (2010). Analysis of the components of wisdom in Nahj al-Balagha using content analysis. Journal of Public Administration Perspectives. 2(1), 33-48. (In Persian) Rezaian, A. (1996). Management based on Islamic values. Knowledge Management Quarterly (not published), 33 and 34(0). Rooney, D., McKenna, B. and Liesch, P. (2010), Wisdom and Management in the Knowledge Economy, Routledge, New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852798 Rowley, J. (2006). What do we need to know about wisdom?. Management decision, 44(9), 1246-1257. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740610707712 Rowley, J., & Slack, F. (2009). “Conceptions of wisdom”, Journal of information science, 35(1), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551508092269 Sabharwal, A. (2018). The Transformative Role of Institutional Repositories in Academic Knowledge Management. In Managing Knowledge and Scholarly Assets in Academic Libraries. 127-155. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6921-3.ch003 Salehnezhad, A., & Shadmanfar, M. H. (2024). Designing experience management model based on the statements of Imam Khamenei. Scientific Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 7(1), 19-52. https://doi.org/10.47176/smok.2024.1670 (In Persian) Selgi ,G,. & Soltani, A. (2017). The wise leadership model of Supreme Leader Imam Khamenei (Madazla-Al-Aali), the focal point of the soft power of the Islamic Revolution (based on the induction of the speech act extracted from the statements of the Supreme Leader), Islamic Revolution Cultural Guard Journal, No. 18, 1-32. (In Persian) SeyyedTabatabaei, S. M., Ahmadi, M., Hajizadeh, A., & Miyanbandi, A. (2022). Scoping Review of Research of Islamic Management in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Meta-study of Articles Published up to 1400 AH. Scientific Journal of Islamic Management, 29(4), 189-219. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22516980.1400.29.4.6.4 (In Persian) Schermerhorn Jr, J. R., & Bachrach, D. G. (2023). Management. John Wiley & Sons. Small, M. W. (2011). Developing wisdom and moral duty in management. Journal of Management Development, 30(9), 836-846. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711111164321 Staudinger, U.M., & Law. A. (2018). Wisdom. Encyclopedia of Mental Health, 4, 375-381. Yang, S. Y. (2008). A process view of wisdom. Journal of Adult Development, 15, 62-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-008-9037-8 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 150 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 30 |
||