اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 34 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,289 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,294 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,800,282 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,339,814 |
بازگشت رقابت قدرت‌های بزرگ؛ تقابل فناورانه- تجاری آمریکا و چین | ||
| مطالعات راهبردی آمریکا | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 4، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 15، دی 1403، صفحه 67-94 اصل مقاله (752.68 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.27834743/ASS.2411.1258.3 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مهرشاد غفاری زاده1؛ نوذر شفیعی* 2؛ سعید وثوقی3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین الملل، گروه علوم سیاسی و روابط بین الملل، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه روابط بین الملل، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشیار گروه علوم سیاسی و روابط بین الملل، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 20 آبان 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 30 آذر 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 01 دی 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پس از دو دهه نظم جهانی به رهبری آمریکا، بازگشت رقابت قدرت‌های بزرگ به مهم‌ترین ویژگی تعیین کننده نظام بین‌الملل در قرن بیست و یکم تبدیل شده است. در عصر جدید رقابت قدرت‌های بزرگ، تبیین چند قطبی میان آمریکا، چین و روسیه و دوگانۀ چینی- آمریکایی از اهمیت ویژه‌ای برخوردار است. در حال حاضر که چین دومین اقتصاد و بزرگ‌ترین مصرف کننده انرژی است، در مسیر تبدیل شدن به بزرگ‌ترین اقتصاد جهان تا سال 2030 قرار دارد. ظهور چین به عنوان یک قدرت جهانی، آمریکا را در مؤلفه‌های اقتصادی، نظامی، فناوری و ایدئولوژیک با چالش مواجه کرده است. با توجه به در جریان بودن رقابت میان دو کشور، پرسش اصلی مقاله این است که چین و آمریکا چه روندی را در روابط دوجانبه طی کرده‌اند تا به سطح رقابت و تقابل در بعد فناورانه رسیده‌اند و ابعاد اصلی این رقابت چیست؟ بر اساس یافته‌های پژوهش که مبتنی بر روش روند پژوهشی به دست آمده است، می‌توان گفت که هدف راهبردی آمریکا، ادغام چین در سیستم بین‌المللی تحت هژمونی این کشور بود و ریشه در این باور داشت که حمایت از ظهور چین و ادغام آن در نظم بین‌المللی غرب محور منجر به آزادسازی اقتصادی و تسری آن به سیستم سیاسی چین خواهد شد. هدف پژوهش دستیابی به چشماندازی از تقابل ایالات متحده و چین در حوزه فناورانه- تجاری است. طبق یافته‌های پژوهش رقابت بین آمریکا و چین به احتمال زیاد در یک دهه آینده ادامه خواهد یافت و با توجه به پیچیدگی روابط این دو کشور، ممکن است به همدستی‌های محدود و همکاری در چالش‌هایی مانند تغییرات اقلیمی منجر شود و در نهایت یک نظم جدید بین‌المللی را شکل دهد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| رقابت؛ قدرت‌های بزرگ؛ تقابل فناورانه؛ تقابل تجاری؛ افول آمریکا؛ نظم جدید جهانی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Return of Great Power Competition: The Technological-Commercial Confrontation between the U.S. and China | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mehrshad GHafarizadeh1؛ Nozar Shafiee2؛ saeed vosoughi3 | ||
| 1PhD Student, in International Relations., Faculty of administrative sciences and economy, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| 2International Relation department of tehran university | ||
| 3Department of Political Science, university of Esfahan, Esfahan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| After two decades of a U.S.-led global order, the resurgence of great power competition has emerged as the defining characteristic of the international system in the 21st century. In this new era of great power rivalry, the multipolar dynamics among the U.S., China, and Russia, along with the U.S.-China duality, hold particular significance. China, currently the second-largest economy and the largest energy consumer, is poised to become the world's largest economy by 2030. China's rise as a global power has presented challenges to the U.S. across economic, military, technological, and ideological dimensions. Given the ongoing competition between the two nations, the central question of this article is what trajectory China and the U.S. have followed in their bilateral relations to reach a level of competition and confrontation in the technological sphere, and what are the primary dimensions of this rivalry? Based on the hypothesis and findings of the research, it can be stated that the strategic goal of the U.S. was to integrate China into the international system under its hegemony, grounded in the belief that supporting China's ascent and incorporating it into a Western-centric international order would foster economic liberalization and extend to China's political system. The objective of this research is to provide an overview of the confrontation between the United States and China in the technological-commercial domain. According to the research findings, competition between the U.S. and China is likely to persist over the next decade, and given the complexity of the relations between these two countries, it may lead to limited collusions and cooperation on challenges such as climate change, ultimately shaping a new international order. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| great power competition, strategic confrontation, transformation, United States, China | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
آسیابان، امید. (1401). الگوهای حکمرانی؛ گسل‌‌های ژئوپلیتیک و رقابت آمریکا با چین و روسیه. مطالعات راهبردی آمریکا، 2(7)، 151- 121.
ترکی، هادی. (1403). رهیافت جدید قدرت مبتنی بر هوش مصنوعی (مطالعه موردی رقابت آمریکا و چین از ۲۰۱۰ تا ۲۰۲۳). فصلنامه مطالعات راهبردی، 4 (14)، 92-69.
Abbas, H., Qazi, B.H., Ali, J. (2022). Asia Pacific Geopolitics: US strategies and its implications for China. Asia-Pacific-Annual Research Journal of Far East & South East Asia, 40, 1-20.
Abodunde, T. (2023). Re-examining the trade competitiveness between USA and China: Empirical evidence from prominent international trade measures.
Ashford, E. (2021). Great-power competition is a recipe for disaster. Foreign Policy, 1.
Bettine, M., Picoli, L., Bin, A. (2022). Gaining soft power by fostering science, technology, and innovation: dilemmas in international relations. Sociology International Journal, 6(2), 67.
Blankenship, B.D., Denison, B. (2019). Is America prepared for great-power competition?. Survival, 61(5), 43-64.
Bush, R.C. (2011). The United States and China: A G-2 in the making?. The Brookings Institute, October, 11(201), 1.
Charlier, C., Guillou, S. (2014). Distortion effects of export quota policy: an analysis of the China-Raw Materials dispute. China Economic Review, 31, 320-338.
Gawi, Y. A., Abdullahi, A. (2024). The Competition between the United sSates and China in the Emerging Technologies and its Implications on the Associated National Security. Journal of Global Social Sciences, June, 5(18), 39-54.
Gomes, N.P., de Mendonça Cohen, S.A., Flores, A.M.M. (2018). Estudos de Tendências: Contributo para uma abordagem de análise e gestão da cultura. ModaPalavra e-periódico, 11(22), 49-81.
Grano, S.A. (2023). China-US Strategic Competition: Impact on small and middle powers in Europe and Asia. In China-US Competition: Impact on Small and Middle Powers' Strategic Choices (pp. 3-25). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Hamdani, M., Belfencha, I. (2024). Strategic implications of the US-China semiconductor rivalry. Discover Global Society, 2(1), 67.
HOEHN, J., SAYER, K. (2020). Renewed great power competition: implications for defense-issues for congress. Washington U-nited State: Congressional Research Service.
House, W. (2022). National Security Strategy of the United States, October 2022. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf
Hoyt, T.D. (2021). Re-thinking coalitions: the United States in a world of great power competition. East-West Center. Asia-Pacific Bulletin, (565).
Ichigaya, H., Shinjuku-ku. (2022). The New Normal of Great Power Competition: The U.S.-China-Russia Relationship and the Indo-Pacific Region.The National Institute for Defense Studies. https://www.nids.mod.go.jp/event/proceedings/symposium/pdf/2022/e_all.pdf
Jinping, X. delivered at the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/19thcpcnationalcongress/2017-11/04/content_34115212.htm
Kitfield, J. (2012). Is Obama’s ‘Pivot to Asia’Really a Hedge Against China?. The Atlantic, 8.
Koepp, R. (2020). Locating the Digital Silk Road in the Belt and Road Initiative. Adelphi Series, 60(487-489), 37-50.
Larson, D. W. (2021). Policy or pique? Trump and the turn to great power competition <https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.13134>. Political Science Quarterly, 136(1), 47–79.
Li, X., Wang, W. (2023, October). A Trend Analysis Method Design of Measurement Data Based on Time Series. In 2023 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Information Processing (AIIIP) (pp. 241-245). IEEE.
Lippert, B., Perthes, V., und Politik-SWP-Deutsches, S.W. (2020). Strategic rivalry between United States and China: Causes, tragectories, and implications for Europe.
Lynch, T.F. (Ed.). (2020). Strategic assessment 2020: Into a new era of great power competition. Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University.
Mattis, J .(2018). Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America’, US Department of Defense. https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/ Documents/pubs/2018-NationalDefense-Strategy-Summary.pdf. Emphasis in original.
Nguyen, T.T. (2022). The United States-China Trade War—The Inevitable Strategic Competition. In Conference on Contemporary Economic Issues in Asian Countries (pp. 1-8). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
O’Rourke, R. (2024). Great power competition: implications for defense—Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service.
Office of the Secretary of Defense, U.D.O.D. (2020). Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China, 2020. In Annual Report to Congress. Washington DC: US Department of Defense.
Rehman, I. (2018). Policy Roundtable: Are the United States and China in a New Cold War?. Texas National Security Review, 15.
Rudolf, P. (2020). The Sino-American World Conflict (No. 3/2020). SWP Research Paper.
Siby, K.M. (2018). The US-China trade competition: an Overview. SRIWIJAYA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 213-224.
Siripurapu, A., Berman, N. (2024). The contentious us-china trade relationship. Trade between the world’s two biggest economies has ballooned in recent decades, bringing significant benefits but also perils that have led to calls to rethink the relationship. Council on Foreign Relations. Available at: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/contentious-us-china-trade-relationship.
Sweidan, O.D. (2024). The geopolitics of technology: Evidence from the interaction between the United States and China. Russian Journal of Economics, 10(2), 130-150.
Tellis, A.J. (2019). us-china competition for global influence. Tellis, AJ, Szalwunki, A., Wills, M.
Trump. (2017). National security strategy of the United States of America. US Government Printing Office. https://www.whitehouse.gov/ wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSSFinal-12-18-2017-0905-2.pdf.
Varg, P.A. (1980). Sino-American Relations Past and Present. Diplomatic History, 4(2), 101-111.
Vasudewa, A. (2020). US–China Strategic Competition and Washington’s Conception of Quad Plus. Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs, 3(5), 28-43.
Vasylytsya, O., Chekh, M. (2021). Trade war between the US and China: The scale of influence. INFRASTRUCTURE, 56(1).
Wang, C. (2023). 6. The Technological Confrontation between China and the United States: the Front and Core of the Sino-US Strategic Game. Mirovaâ politika.
Wang, H. (1999). Theme Overview: China as the Leading US Agricultural Export Market.
Westad, O.A. (2019). The sources of Chinese conduct. Foreign Affairs, 98(5), 86-95.
Winkler, S.C. (2023). Strategic competition and US–China relations: A conceptual analysis. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 16(3), 333-356.
Wu, C.X. (2024). A Bargaining Theory of US–China Economic Rivalry: Differentiating the Trade and Technology Wars. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 17(4), 323-345.
Yan, M. (2023). How Techno-Nationalism Affects Technological Decoupling Between China and the US-A Case Study of the Semiconductor Supply Chain. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 10(3), 10-13.
Zhang, X., Luo, W., Xiang, D. (2023). Political turnover and innovation: evidence from China. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 28(3), 401-425. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 534 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 261 |
||