اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات38
تعداد شماره‌ها1,244
تعداد مقالات9,010
تعداد مشاهده مقاله7,867,404
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله4,719,111
نوربخش سامانی, سیده پروانه, خانی, ناصر, بهرامی, مژگان, مروتی شریف آبادی, علی. (1401). استفاده از رویکرد تحلیل ذی‌نفعان در شناسایی موانع سازمانی پذیرش زنجیره ی‌ تأمین مدور. پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری, 24(74), 23-34.
سیده پروانه نوربخش سامانی; ناصر خانی; مژگان بهرامی; علی مروتی شریف آبادی. "استفاده از رویکرد تحلیل ذی‌نفعان در شناسایی موانع سازمانی پذیرش زنجیره ی‌ تأمین مدور". پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری, 24, 74, 1401, 23-34.
نوربخش سامانی, سیده پروانه, خانی, ناصر, بهرامی, مژگان, مروتی شریف آبادی, علی. (1401). 'استفاده از رویکرد تحلیل ذی‌نفعان در شناسایی موانع سازمانی پذیرش زنجیره ی‌ تأمین مدور', پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری, 24(74), pp. 23-34.
نوربخش سامانی, سیده پروانه, خانی, ناصر, بهرامی, مژگان, مروتی شریف آبادی, علی. استفاده از رویکرد تحلیل ذی‌نفعان در شناسایی موانع سازمانی پذیرش زنجیره ی‌ تأمین مدور. پدافند الکترونیکی و سایبری, 1401; 24(74): 23-34.

استفاده از رویکرد تحلیل ذی‌نفعان در شناسایی موانع سازمانی پذیرش زنجیره ی‌ تأمین مدور

مدیریت زنجیره تأمین
دوره 24، شماره 74، خرداد 1401، صفحه 23-34    اصل مقاله (390.53 K)
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی
نویسندگان
سیده پروانه نوربخش سامانی1؛ ناصر خانی* 2؛ مژگان بهرامی3؛ علی مروتی شریف آبادی4
1دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت صنعتی، گروه مدیریت، واحد نجف آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجف آباد، ایران
2استادیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد نجف آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجف آباد، ایران
3استادیار، گروه مدیریت، موسسه آموزش عالی هشت بهشت، اصفهان، ایران
4دانشیار، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
تاریخ دریافت: 24 آذر 1400،  تاریخ بازنگری: 27 بهمن 1400،  تاریخ پذیرش: 02 اسفند 1400 
چکیده
با توجه به افزایش جمعیت و افزایش مصرف‌کننده در بازارهای جهانی، رویکرد اقتصاد مدور به‌تنهایی برای پاسخ‌دهی به ذی‌نفعان و فرآیندهای ساخت و تولید کافی نمی‌باشد و لازم است کل زنجیره‌ی تأمین از مدل خطی به مدل مدور تبدیل شود. مدیریت زنجیره‌ی تأمین مدور راه حل خوبی برای کاهش مشکلاتی مانند آلودگی، کمبود منابع و تغییرات اقلیمی فراهم می‌آورد. هدف مدیریت زنجیره‌ی تأمین مدور بهینه‌سازی مصرف منابع در طول چرخه‌ی عمر محصول، با استفاده از بازیافت مجدد است. با وجود مزیت‌های متعدد به‌کارگیری زنجیره‌ی تأمین مدور، پیاده‌سازی آن در برخی کشورها از جمله ایران با موانع بسیاری همراه است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی موانع سازمانی پذیرش زنجیره‌ی تأمین مدور با بهره‌گیری از رویکرد تحلیل ذی‌نفعان در صنعت فولاد طراحی و اجرا شده است. با توجه به هدف پژوهش، از رویکرد تحلیل ذی‌نفعان به منظور استخراج موانع بهره گرفته شد. در مرحله‌ی اول، از روش گروه کانونی برای شناسایی ذی‌نفعان صنعت فولاد و تعیین جایگاه هرکدام استفاده شد. به منظور بررسی روایی و پایایی پژوهش، اعضای گروه کانونی متشکل از ده نفر از کارشناسان بر اساس مدت سابقه‌ی همکاری خود (حداقل پنج سال) با طرح‌های زنجیره‌ی تأمین صنعت فولاد به روش نمونه‌برداری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. از طریق ماتریس علاقه-قدرت، داده‌ها طبقه‌بندی و اولویت‌بندی شدند. موانع پذیرش زنجیره‌ی تأمین مدور از دیدگاه ذی‌نفعان با استفاده از مصاحبه شناسایی و استخراج گردید. سیاست‌گزاران صنعت فولاد با اتخاذ تدابیری در خصوص رفع موانع شناسایی شده در این مطالعه می‌توانند رویکرد اقتصاد مدور را در زنجیره‌های تأمین پیاده‌سازی کنند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
اقتصاد مدور؛ زنجیره‌ی تأمین مدور؛ رویکرد کیفی تحلیل ذی‌نفعان؛ ماتریس علاقه- قدرت
عنوان مقاله [English]
Identifying Organizational Obstacles to the Acceptance of Circular Supply Chain Using the Stakeholder Analysis Approach
نویسندگان [English]
Seyedeh Parvaneh Nourbakhsh-Samani1؛ Naser Khani2؛ Mojhgan Bahrami3؛ Ali Morovati Sharifabadi4
1Doctoral Student. Department of Management, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
2Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
3Assistant Professor. Department of Management, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
4Associate Professor. Department of Industrial Management, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
چکیده [English]
Taking into account the population growth, significant consumption of natural resources, environmental degradation and the resulting public unrest, the governments’ strategy of circular economy is not sufficient to meet the demands and it is required that the entire supply chain be transformed from the linear model to a circular one. Circular supply chain management is a good solution to reduce problems such as pollution, production patterns, consumption, resource scarcity and climate change. The goal of supply chain management is to optimize the resource consumption throughout the product life cycle by recycling. Despite the many advantages of using a circular supply chain, its implementation in some countries, including Iran, is associated with many obstacles. The present study has been designed and implemented with the aim of identifying and extracting these obstacles using the stakeholder analysis approach in the steel industry. In the first stage, the focus group method was used to identify the stakeholders of the steel industry and determine the position of each. In order to evaluate the validity and reliability of the research, the members of the focus group consisting of ten experts were selected based on their experience (at least five years) with the steel industry supply chain projects by purposive sampling. Data were categorized and prioritized through the interest-power matrix. The obstacles to the acceptance of circular supply chain were identified and extracted from the perspective of stakeholders through interviews. The steel industry policymakers can implement the circular economy approach in supply chains by taking measures to modify the factors identified in this study.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Circular Economy, Circular Supply Chain, Qualitative Stakeholder Analysis Approach, Interest-Power Matrix
مراجع
  • Lieder and A. Rashid, “Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry,” J Clean Prod, vol. 115, pp. 36-51, 2016.
  • Geng, J. Sarkis, S. Ulgiati, and P. Zhang, “Measuring China's circular economy,” Science, vol. 339, pp. 1526-1527, 2013.
  • Bastin, “On-line estimation and adaptive control of bioreactors,” Elsevier, 2013.
  • Su, A. Heshmati, Y. Geng, and X. Yu, “A review of the circular economy in China: moving from rhetoric to implementation,” J Clean Prod, vol. 42, pp. 215-227, 2013.
  • ‌ Shi, M.R. He, K. Jin, H. Bei and I. M. Robertson, “Evolution of ion damage at 773K in Ni-containing concentrated solid-solution alloys,” J Nucl Mater, vol. 501, pp. 132-142, 2018.
  • Mahpour, “Prioritizing barriers to adopt circular economy in construction and demolition waste management,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 134, pp. 216-227, 2018.
  • Korhonen, A. Honkasalo, J. Seppälä, “Circular economy: the concept and its limitations,” Ecol Econ, vol. 143, pp. 37-46, 2018.
  • C. Schultz, “Governance as a" game changer" for the circular economy: a commentary on circular supply chain governance,” Acad Strateg Manag J, vol. 20, 1-3, 2021.
  • Williams, “Business as Usual,” Economy and Society, vol. 30, pp. 399–411, 2001.
  • Z. Luo, and B. Z. Lu, “Dynamic analysis of circular economy in China from the perspective of knowledge map,” Statistic Inform Forum, vol. 32, pp. 109–113, 2017.
  • Genovese, A. A. Acquaye, A. Figueroa, and S. L. Koh, “Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications,” Omega, vol. 66, pp. 344-357, 2017.
  • H. A. Nasir, A. Genovese, A.A. Acquaye, S. Koh, and F. Yamoah, “Comparing linear and circular supply chains: A case study from the construction industry,” Int J Prod Econ, vol. 183, pp. 443-457, 2017.
  • Sharma, S. Basu, N. P. Shetti, and T. M. Aminabhavi, “Waste-to-energy nexus for circular economy and environmental protection: recent trends in hydrogen energy,” Sci Total Environ, vol. 713, pp. 136633, 2020.
  • ‌ Batista, M. Bourlakis, Y. Liu, P. Smart, A. Sohal, “Supply chain operations for a circular economy,” Prod Plan Control, vol. 29, pp. 419-424, 2018.
  • Govindan and M. Hasanagic, “A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective,” Int J Prod Res, vol. 56, pp. 278-311, 2018.
  • Howard, P. Hopkinson, and J. Miemczyk, “The regenerative supply chain: a framework for developing circular economy indicators,” Int J Prod Res, vol. 57, pp. 7300-18, 2019.
  • Kazancoglu, Y. Kazancoglu, E. Yarimoglu, and A. Kahraman, “A conceptual framework for barriers of circular supply chains for sustainability in the textile industry,” Sustain Develop, vol. 28, pp. 1477-1492, 2020.
  • Kok, G. Wurpel, and A. Ten Wolde, “Unleashing the power of the circular economy,” 2013.
  • Murray, K. Skene, and K. Haynes, “The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context,” J Bus Ethics, vol. 140, pp. 369-380, 2017.
  • Millar, E. McLaughlin, and T. Börger, “The circular economy: swings and roundabouts?” Ecol Econ, vol. 158, pp. 11-19, 2019.
  • Hobson, , “Closing the loop or squaring the circle? Locating generative spaces for the circular economy,” Prog Hum Geogr, vol. 40, pp. 88-104, 2016.
  • M. Mendoza, M. Sharmina, A. Gallego-Schmid, G. Heyes, A. Azapagic, “Integrating backcasting and eco-design for the circular economy: The BECE framework,” J Industr Ecol, vol. 21, pp. 526-544, 2017.
  • Masi, S. Day, J. Godsell, “Supply chain configurations in the circular economy: A systematic literature review,” Sustainability, vol. 9, pp. 1602, 2017.
  • Komasi, and S. M. J. Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, “Sustainable supply chain network design using lean principles,” Iran J Supply Chain Manag, vol. 22, pp. 101-116, 2021.
  • Amini, and A. Alinezhad, “Developing network DEA model with undesirable outputs for evaluation of green supply chain management,” Iran J Supply Chain Manag, vol. 21, pp. 51-63, 2019.
  • Seuring and M. Müller, “From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management,” J. Clean Prod. Vol. 16, pp. 1699-710, 2008.
  • L. French, and R. L. LaForge, “Closed-loop supply chains in process industries: An empirical study of producer re-use issues,” J Oper Manag, vol. 24, pp. 271-286, 2006.
  • Levering and B. Vos, “Organizational Drivers and Barriers to Circular Supply Chain Operations. In: Operations Management and Sustainability,” Springer; pp. 43-66, 2019.
  • Sehnem, C. J. Jabbour, S. C. Pereira, A. B. de Sousa Jabbour, “Improving sustainable supply chains performance through operational excellence: circular economy approach,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 149, pp. 236-248, 2019.
  • Zhang, V. G.Venkatesh, Y. Liu, M. Wan, T. Qu, and D. Huisingh, “Barriers to smart waste management for a circular economy in China,” J Clean Prod, vol. 240, pp. 118198, 2019.‌
  • K. Mangla, S. Luthra, N. Mishra, A. Singh, N. P. Rana, M. Dora, and Y. Dwivedi, “Barriers to effective circular supply chain management in a developing country context,” Prod Plan Control, vol. 29, pp. 551-569, 2018.
  • Farooque, A. Zhang, Y. Liu, “Barriers to circular food supply chains in China,” Supply Chain Manag, 2019.
  • Khandelwal, and M. K. Barua, “Prioritizing circular supply chain management barriers using fuzzy AHP: Case of the Indian plastic industry,” Glob Bus Rev, pp. 0972150920948818, 2020.‌
  • Kumar, and P. Verma, “Biomass-based biorefineries: an important architype towards a circular economy,” Fuel 288: 119622, 2021.
  • Lahane, R. Kant, and R. Shankar, “Circular supply chain management: A state-of-art review and future opportunities,” J Clean Prod, vol. 258, pp. 120859, 2020.
  • Saroha, D. Garg, and S. Luthra, “Pressures in implementation of circular supply chain management for sustainability,” Manag Environ Qual, vol. 31, pp. 1091-1110, 2020.
  • D. Ozkan-Ozen, Y. Kazancoglu, S. K. Mangla, “Synchronized barriers for circular supply chains in industry 3.5/industry 4.0 transition for sustainable resource management. Resources,” Conserv Recycl, vol. 161, pp. 104986, 2020.
  • Kazancoglu, Y. Kazancoglu, A. Kahraman, E. Yarimoglu, and G. Soni, “Investigating barriers to circular supply chain in the textile industry from Stakeholders’ perspective,” Int J Logist Res Appl, pp. 1-28, 2020.
  • K. Jain, A. Panda, P. Choudhary, “Institutional pressures and circular economy performance: The role of environmental management system and organizational flexibility in oil and gas sector,” Bus Strateg Environt, vol. 29(8), pp. 3509-3525, 2020.
  • Zhu, Y. Geng, and K. H. Lai, “Environmental supply chain cooperation and its effect on the circular economy practice-performance relationship among Chinese manufacturers,” J Ind Ecol, vol. 15, pp. 405–419, 2011.
  • Greger, D. Balta, P. Wolf, and H. Krcmar, “Analyzing stakeholders in complex e-government projects: Towards a stakeholder interaction model,” International Conference on Electronic Government, Electron Gov, pp. 194-205, 2014.
  • Project Management Institute, “A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide),” 5th Newtown Square, PA: USA: Project Management Institute, pp. 589, 2013.
  • A. Camilleri, “European environment policy for the circular economy: Implications for business and industry stakeholders,” Sustain Dev, vol. 28, pp. 1804-1812, 2020.
  • Gupta, H. Chen, B.T. Hazen, S. Kaur, and E.D. Gonzalez, “Circular economy and big data analytics: A stakeholder perspective,” Technol Forecast Soc Chang, vol. 144, pp. 466-474, 2019.
  • Kunz, K. Mayers, and L.N. Van Wassenhove, "Stakeholder views on extended producer responsibility and the circular economy,” Calif Manag Rev, vol. 60, pp. 45-70, 2018.
  • Schaubroeck, C. Petucco, and E. Benetto, “Evaluate impact also per stakeholder in sustainability assessment, especially for financial analysis of circular economy initiatives,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 150, pp. 104411, 2019.
  • Grimble, and K. Wellard, “Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities,” Agric Syst, vol. 55, pp. 173–193, 1997.
  • S. Reed, A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K. Hubacek, J. Morris, et. al., “Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management,” J Environ Manag, vol. 90, pp. 1933–1949, 2009.
  • M. Bryson, “Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations,” John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
  • Bryson, and M. Patton, “Analyzing and engaging stakeholders. In H. Hatry, J. Wholey, and K. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation,” San Francisco, CA:
    Jossey-Bass. 3rd Ed., pp. 30–54, 2010.
  • Aly, M. Moner-Girona, S. Szabó, A.B. Pedersen, S.S. Jensen, “Barriers to large-scale solar power in Tanzania,” Energy Sustain Dev, vol. 48, pp. 43–58, 2019.
  • Guðlaugsson, R. Fazeli, I. Gunnarsdóttir, B. Davidsdottir, G. Stefansson, “Classification of stakeholders of sustainable energy development in Iceland: Utilizing a power-interest matrix and fuzzy logic theory,” Energy Sustain Dev, vol. 57, pp. 168-188, 2020.
  • Newig, and T. M. Koontz, “Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: the EU's mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy,” J Eur Public Policy, vol. 21, pp. 248-267, 2014.
  • A. Krishnan, P. K. Lindenauer, D.H. Au, S.S. Carson, T.A. Lee, M.A. McBurnie, et al. “Stakeholder priorities for comparative effectiveness research in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a workshop report,” Am J Respir Crit Care Med, vol. 187, pp. 320–6, 2013.
  • Senaratne, K. Abhishek, S. Perera and L. Almeida, “Promoting stakeholder collaboration in adopting circular economy principles for sustainable construction,” 2021.
  • Varvasovszky, and R. Brugha, “A stakeholder analysis,” Health Policy Plan, vol. 15, pp. 338-345, 2000.
  • Ackermann, and C. Eden, “Stakeholders Matter: Techniques for their identification and management,” Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, 2001.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 487
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 254